In situ antibiofilm effect of glass-ionomer cement containing dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 992-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Feng ◽  
Lei Cheng ◽  
Xuedong Zhou ◽  
Hockin H.K. Xu ◽  
Michael D. Weir ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mônica Tostes Amaral ◽  
Antônio Carlos Guedes-Pinto ◽  
Orlando Chevitarese

This work evaluated the remineralization of demineralized enamel of pits and fissures of human third molars sealed with a glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX, GC Corporation - Japan) or with a Bis-GMA sealant (Delton - Dentsply). Ten volunteers participated in this in situ study that consisted of two thirty-day periods using intra-oral devices, with a week’s interval in between. Four experimental treatment procedures and one control were randomly assigned to the volunteers’ specimens: Group I, no treatment, control; Group II, artificial caries process; Group III, same treatment as Group II, but sealed with Delton (Dentsply); Group IV, same treatment as Group II, but sealed with Fuji IX (GC Corporation - Japan); Group V, same treatment as Group II and no sealing. Groups I and II were not submitted to the oral environment and served as controls. After a period of 30 days in the oral environment, the specimens were removed from the devices, embedded in acrylic resin, ground flat and polished. Then, Knoop hardness tests were performed, with a 25 g static load applied for 15 seconds. The measurements were made from the base of the fissure up to an opening of 600 µm, pre-established between the inclines of the cusps. Three indentations were then made, located at 25, 75, and 125 µm in depth from the outer enamel margin and 100 µm apart from each other (Micromet 2003). The Brieger F and Bonferroni’s tests were applied to the measurements. It was concluded that sealing with the glass ionomer cement Fuji IX was capable of making the enamel of pits and fissures more resistant by increasing the value of Knoop hardness.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Trairatvorakul ◽  
P Techalertpaisarn ◽  
S Siwawut ◽  
A Ingprapankorn

Objective: To compare the effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and fluoride varnish (F-varnish) on artificial proximal caries in situ. Study design: Two 1×3 mm2 enamel slabs, divided into three 1×1 mm2 windows,were prepared from each proximal surface of 18 premolars. Each slab was distributed into a control area,an intact enamel area and a test area. Artificial lesions were created on the control and test areas by immersing in demineralizing solution for 24 hours. The test windows were either applied with GIC or F-varnish and the full slabs inserted into orthodontic brackets as carriers, which were then bonded to the buccal surfaces of the 6 upper posterior teeth of 6 volunteers using non-fluoride dentifrice for 30 days. There was a 1-week washout period in this crossover study. The middle specimens of the three windows were cross-sectioned to analyze the carious lesion area by a polarized light microscope and calculated with Image-Pro plus® software.Results: The average carious lesion area under GIC was significantly less than that under F-varnish(p<0.05). Conclusion: GIC promotes more remineralization of artificial carious lesions on proximal surfaces than F-varnish.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Ten Cate ◽  
M.J. Buus ◽  
J.J.M. Damen

Glass-ionomer cement (GIC) restorations release fluoride after placement in the oral environment. This is assumed to be one of the reasons for the decreased prevalence of secondary caries. In the current studies, the effects of GIC restorations on demineralization and remineralization of enamel and dentin lesions were studied, in an in vitro and an intra-oral model, respectively. The in vitro pH-cycling study revealed that the excessive fluoride release of the freshly placed restorations upset the (commonly observed) mineral balance between the specimens and the de/remineralizing solutions. Anomalous patterns of calcium uptake by the specimens (with GIC) during the demineralization phase and calcium loss during the remineralization phase were observed. This was hypothetically explained from the behavior of a surface coating on the GIC restorations, which was observed with SEM. The intra-oral studies showed, after three months in situ, hypermineralization of dentin close to or in contact with the restoration. It is concluded that the fluoride released from GIC or the decreased permeability as a result of hypermineralization causes lower susceptibility of the dentin of the cavity walls.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 559-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Albuquerque Guedes ◽  
Bruna Oliveira-Reis ◽  
Anderson Catelan ◽  
ThaÍs Yumi Umeda Suzuki ◽  
André LuÍz Fraga Briso ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of acidic solutions (AS) on surface roughness (Ra) and microhardness of restorative materials (RM). Materials and Methods: Eight volunteers wore intraoral palatal devices (IPD) containing samples of RM: Ketac Nano (KN); Ketac Nano + Biscover LV (KN-B); Esthet-X (EX); Esthet-X + Biscover LV (EX-B); Supreme XT (SXT); Supreme XT + Biscover LV (SXT-B); and bovine enamel. The samples were submitted to three phases: (1) immersion in 0.01M hydrochloric acid (HCl) – 10 min, three times/day (14 days); (2) immersion in soft drink (Sprite®) – 10 min, three times/day (14 days); and (3) keeping in saliva (14 days). Changes in Ra/microhardness were measured before/after the three phases. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Fisher's test. Results: Materials sealed with Biscover LV (B) presented lowest values in all periods. KN glass ionomer cement showed highest Ra values after exposure in AS. Application of B did not reduce the Ra for the composites studied, except for EX after immersion in HCl. AS promoted changes in Ra/microhardness of RM, except for sealed materials. Conclusions: The acids used were able to change the Ra and microhardness of RM, except of the sealed materials. The resin-modified GIC showed the most significant changes after immersion in AS; and the composites sealed with B, even after immersion in acidic solutions (AS), showed the lowest Ra values and the least degradation in microhardness, especially when subjected to low pH solutions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Yamamoto ◽  
Koji Arai ◽  
Kaori Fukazawa ◽  
Keiko Fukui ◽  
Kumiko Nagamatsu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.


Author(s):  
Nagalakshmi Chowdhary ◽  
N. K. Kiran ◽  
A. Lakshmi Priya ◽  
Rajashekar Reddy ◽  
Arvind Sridhara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document