Evaluation of the prognostic impact of pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy using Mandard’s Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) in gastric adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Derieux ◽  
Magali Svrcek ◽  
Sarah Manela ◽  
Christine Lagorce-Pages ◽  
Anne Berger ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 609-609
Author(s):  
Ryo Inada ◽  
Shigeyoshi Iwamoto ◽  
Masaki Kaibori ◽  
Morihiko Ishizaki ◽  
Hiroya Iida ◽  
...  

609 Background: The purpose of this study was to characterize histological tumor regression grade (TRG) to colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by liver surgery, and to evaluate whether TRG correlates with radiological response and prognosis. Methods: This study included 30 patients with CLM treated by surgical resection after preoperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin- or irrinotecan-based regimens with or without molecular target agents. TRG was determined by the amount of fibrosis and necrosis replaced from tumor cells, ranging TRG 0 (0%), 1 (1-24%), 2 (25-50%), 3 (51-99%), and 4 (100%). Results: TRG 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 0%, 6.7%, 10.0%, 66.7%, and 16.6% of the patients, respectively. There were no relations between TRG and regimen, including molecular target agents. As shown in the table, radiological response was not significantly correlated with TRG. Patients with histological major response (TRG 3+4) had better prognosis (MST; TRG 1+2 vs. 3+4: 20.0 vs. 50 months, P= 0.007), and a multivariate analysis identified histological major response as an independent good prognostic factor. Conclusions: In this analysis, histological TRG predicted survival after preoperative chemotherapy and resection for CLM. Preoperative radiological response could not evaluate TRG. [Table: see text]


Esophagus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mashiro Okunaka ◽  
Daisuke Kotani ◽  
Ken Demachi ◽  
Hisashi Fujiwara ◽  
Shingo Sakashita ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In Japan, standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) includes preoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus cisplatin followed by esophagectomy. However, its efficacy is unclear in patients with recurrent disease with < 6 months of chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) after preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy and in those with ≥ 6 months of CFI and poor pathological response to prior preoperative chemotherapy. Method We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of fluorouracil plus platinum in patients with recurrent ESCC who received preoperative chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy. Results Among 105 patients with recurrent ESCC after preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy, a total of 55 patients received fluorouracil plus platinum for recurrent disease. Patients with a CFI < 6 months (n = 20) had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (median, 7.1 vs 14.5 months, P = 0.008) compared with those with a CFI ≥ 6 months (n = 35). Multivariate analysis showed that OS was worse in patients with a CFI < 6 months or a tumor regression grade (TRG) ≤ 1a. Furthermore, in patients with a CFI ≥ 6 months, TRG ≤ 1a was associated with significantly shorter OS (11.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.001). Conclusion Fluorouracil plus platinum was ineffective for recurrent ESCC in patients with a CFI < 6 months and in those with a CFI ≥ 6 months and a TRG ≤ 1a. Alternate regimens including nivolumab or pembrolizumab might be considered for the treatment for recurrence in these patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4676
Author(s):  
Eva Lieto ◽  
Annamaria Auricchio ◽  
Giuseppe Tirino ◽  
Luca Pompella ◽  
Iacopo Panarese ◽  
...  

Despite recent progresses, locally advanced gastric cancer remains a daunting challenge to embrace. Perioperative chemotherapy and D2-gastrectomy depict multimodal treatment of gastric cancer in Europe, shows better results than curative surgery alone in terms of downstaging, micrometastases elimination, and improved long-term survival. Unfortunately, preoperative chemotherapy is useless in about 50% of cases of non-responder patients, in which no effect is registered. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is directly related to chemotherapy effectiveness, but its understanding is achieved only after surgical operation; accordingly, preoperative chemotherapy is given indiscriminately. Conversely, Naples Prognostic Score (NPS), related to patient immune-nutritional status and easily obtained before taking any therapeutic decision, appeared an independent prognostic variable of TRG. NPS was calculated in 59 consecutive surgically treated gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant FLOT4-based chemotherapy. 42.2% of positive responses were observed: all normal NPS and half mild/moderate NPS showed significant responses to chemotherapy with TRG 1–3; while only 20% of the worst NPS showed some related benefits. Evaluation of NPS in gastric cancer patients undergoing multimodal treatment may be useful both in selecting patients who will benefit from preoperative chemotherapy and for changing immune-nutritional conditions in order to improve patient’s reaction against the tumor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yilin Tong ◽  
Yanmei Zhu ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Zexing Shan ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
...  

Background. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is widely used in gastrointestinal carcinoma to evaluate pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), but whether it is an independent prognostic factor is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of TRG in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NCT and curative resection. Methods. Pathological regression was reevaluated according to the Mandard TRG. Survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses for survival were based on the Cox proportional hazards method. Results. In total, 290 patients were identified in our electronic database. In univariable analysis, TRG was associated with OS (HR=3.822, P≤0.001) and DFS (HR=3.374, P≤0.001). However, in multivariable analysis, TRG was not an independent factor for OS (P=0.231) or DFS (P=0.191). In the stratified analysis, TRG retrieved prognostic significance in patients with the metastasis of lymph node (HR=2.034, P=0.035 for OS; HR=2.220, P=0.016 for DFS), while not in patients with negative lymph node (P=0.296 for OS; P=0.172 for DFS). Conclusions. TRG was not an independent predictor for survival, but the system regained its predicting significance in patients with lymph node metastasis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  

Introduction: The article contains a summary of the issues of staging and therapy with an emphasis on the neoadjuvant treatment and associated tumor regression grade with the analysis of our own group of patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who underwent a surgery at the 1st Department of Surgery – Thoratic, Abdominal and Injury Surgery; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic, focusing on those who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and their pathologists evaluated tumor regression grade after the resection. Results: The group consists of 161 patients operated on between 2012 and 2016. 47 patients underwent neoadjuvant oncological treatment with further evaluation of the tumor regression grade by a pathologist, a scoring system according to Ryan was used. A complete pathological response was elicited in 10.4% of patients, no response in 35.4% of patients, and partial tumor regression in 54.2%. Conclusion: Although there is a difference in our results compared to foreign publications, the proportion of patients remains comparable. Studies evaluating the advantages versus disadvantages of neoadjuvant therapy will certainly follow, and the question of the suitability of surgical treatment as the only curative solution is partially raised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document