scholarly journals A Phase III Diagnostic Accuracy Study of a Rapid Diagnostic Test for Diagnosis of Second-Stage Human African Trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

EBioMedicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen Boelaert ◽  
Deby Mukendi ◽  
Emmanuel Bottieau ◽  
Jean Roger Kalo Lilo ◽  
Kristien Verdonck ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e0204335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Bessell ◽  
Crispin Lumbala ◽  
Pascal Lutumba ◽  
Sylvain Baloji ◽  
Sylvain Biéler ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0201306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelie Jeandron ◽  
Oliver Cumming ◽  
Baron Bashige Rumedeka ◽  
Jaime Mufitini Saidi ◽  
Simon Cousens

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (24) ◽  
pp. 3019-3025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Paolo Piccaluga ◽  
Fabio Fuligni ◽  
Antonio De Leo ◽  
Clara Bertuzzi ◽  
Maura Rossi ◽  
...  

PurposeThe differential diagnosis among the commonest peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs; ie, PTCL not otherwise specified [NOS], angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma [AITL], and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma [ALCL]) is difficult, with the morphologic and phenotypic features largely overlapping. We performed a phase III diagnostic accuracy study to test the ability of gene expression profiles (GEPs; index test) to identify PTCL subtype.MethodsWe studied 244 PTCLs, including 158 PTCLs NOS, 63 AITLs, and 23 ALK-negative ALCLs. The GEP-based classification method was established on a support vector machine algorithm, and the reference standard was an expert pathologic diagnosis according to WHO classification.ResultsFirst, we identified molecular signatures (molecular classifier [MC]) discriminating either AITL and ALK-negative ALCL from PTCL NOS in a training set. Of note, the MC was developed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples and validated in both FFPE and frozen tissues. Second, we found that the overall accuracy of the MC was remarkable: 98% to 77% for AITL and 98% to 93% for ALK-negative ALCL in test and validation sets of patient cases, respectively. Furthermore, we found that the MC significantly improved the prognostic stratification of patients with PTCL. Particularly, it enhanced the distinction of ALK-negative ALCL from PTCL NOS, especially from some CD30+ PTCL NOS with uncertain morphology. Finally, MC discriminated some T-follicular helper (Tfh) PTCL NOS from AITL, providing further evidence that a group of PTCLs NOS shares a Tfh derivation with but is distinct from AITL.ConclusionOur findings support the usage of an MC as additional tool in the diagnostic workup of nodal PTCL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Athanasios Pavlou ◽  
Robert M. Kurtz ◽  
Jae W. Song

Accuracy is an important parameter of a diagnostic test. Studies that attempt to determine a test’s accuracy can suffer from various forms of bias. As radiology is a diagnostic specialty, many radiologists may design a diagnostic accuracy study or review one to understand how it may apply to their practice. Radiologists also frequently serve as consultants to other physicians regarding the selection of the most appropriate diagnostic exams. In these roles, understanding how to critically appraise the literature is important for all radiologists. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for evaluating potential sources of study design biases that are found in diagnostic accuracy studies and to explain their impact on sensitivity and specificity estimates. To help the reader understand these biases, we also present examples from the radiology literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document