Rebound insomnia induced by abrupt withdrawal of hypnotics in sleep-disturbed rats

2008 ◽  
Vol 597 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hirase ◽  
Takayuki Ishida ◽  
Chiaki Kamei
2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 301-304
Author(s):  
Gavin Reid ◽  
Mark Hughson

Aims and Method We conducted a postal questionnaire survey of the practice of rapid tranquillisation among 215 consultant psychiatrists in the West of Scotland, before and after the withdrawal of droperidol by the manufacturer. Results One hundred and eighty questionnaires (84% of those sent) were returned. Droperidol had been used extensively, often combined with lorazepam, for rapid tranquillisation. The main replacement suggested for droperidol was haloperidol. About half of the respondents to our survey chose to comment on the withdrawal of droperidol. More than half of the comments were unfavourable, including lack of an adequate replacement and lack of consultation with the psychiatric profession. Clinical Implications The abrupt withdrawal of droperidol, partly for commercial reasons, was regrettable. There was no time for an adequate evaluation of possible replacement medications and a lack of consultation with the profession regarding the impact on clinical care.


The Lancet ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 338 (8781) ◽  
pp. 1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. James ◽  
M. Rhodes ◽  
P. Rose ◽  
P. Kendall-Taylor

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 723-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Solyom ◽  
Carol Solyom ◽  
Barry Ledwidge

Two patients suffering from severe obsessive-compulsive disorder which had proven refractory to clomipramine and/or phenelzine treatment were successfully treated with fluoxetine, a new drug with a strong serotonin uptake inhibiting action. Outcome of treatment was measured on psychometric tests including the Leyton Obsessive Inventory, Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90, Beck Depression Inventory, and daily self-reports of the duration and degree of discomfort of their most severe obsessions. The delay in responding to fluoxetine, the continuing improvement even after one year on the drug, and the prompt relapse with abrupt withdrawal of treatment were noted.


Science ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 201 (4360) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kales ◽  
M. Scharf ◽  
J. Kales

1985 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1066-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Reeves ◽  
Lawrence Cook ◽  
Mary Ann Wood ◽  
Lawrence Whitesell

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A190-A190
Author(s):  
G Koshorek ◽  
J Verkler ◽  
T Roth ◽  
T Roehrs

Abstract Introduction Rebound insomnia refers to worsened sleep relative to baseline on 1-2 nights after discontinuation of active hypnotic medication. Rebound is typically assessed using a placebo substitution. We assessed rebound in an on-going “blinded” clinical trial in which people with insomnia are instructed to discontinue their study medication (i.e., no-pill) after 6 months of nightly use. Methods DSM-V diagnosed people with insomnia (n=31, 26 females), aged 26-61 yrs, with a polysomnographic sleep efficiency of ≤85%, no other sleep disorders, unstable medical or psychiatric diseases or drug dependency completed the clinical trial. Participants were randomized to zolpidem XR (12.5 mg), eszopiclone (3 mg) or placebo nightly for 6 months (blinded groups A: n=11, B: n=9, C: n=11). After 6 months, over a 2-week choice period, they were given the instruction to discontinue their nightly hypnotic use with an opportunity, if necessary, to self-administer either 1, 2, or 3 capsules of their assigned medication (zolpidem XR 6.25 mg, 6.25 mg, placebo; eszopiclone 2 mg, 1 mg, placebo as capsules 1, 2 and 3 respectively; or 3 placebos). On baseline and the14 discontinuation nights, sleep was recorded and scored by actigraphy for sleep efficiency (SE), sleep latency (LAT) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). Results Relative to the baseline night, on the first discontinuation night there was no difference in SE, LAT, and WASO. Fifteen subjects stopped taking study medication when told to discontinue and 16 subjects took study medication on one night or more. While not differing on baseline or night 1, on night 14 the last study night the medication users had a lower SE (75.9 vs 87.7 %, p<.0.004) and a longer LAT (61.5 vs 14.5 min, p<0.05). Conclusion Difficulty discontinuing hypnotic use is not specifically related to rebound insomnia. We reported in a companion abstract those with insomnia and hyperarousal, defined by MSLT, are those with difficulty discontinuing hypnotic use and as shown here slept poorly on the last study night. Support NIDA, grant#: R01DA038177 awarded to Dr. Roehrs


1983 ◽  
Vol 90 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 237-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Cools ◽  
Bart A. Ellenbroek ◽  
Clasina M. Van Den Heuvel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document