Shanghai international consensus on diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2019)

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-966
Author(s):  
Li Ren ◽  
Dexiang Zhu ◽  
Al B. Benson ◽  
Bernard Nordlinger ◽  
Claus-Henning Koehne ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15093-e15093
Author(s):  
Ali Bohlok ◽  
Robin Dezes ◽  
Valerio Lucidi ◽  
Fikri Bouazza ◽  
Desislava Germanova ◽  
...  

e15093 Background: The identification of oligometastatic profile in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) would represent a major progress to improve selection for surgery. Currently, in the absence of biomarkers, the most reliable method to identify oligometastatic (OLM) and non-oligometastatic (NOLM) tumors relies on the oncological outcome after metastases-targeted surgery. The histological growth pattern (HGP) of CRLM, defined as desmoplastic (dHGP) or replacement (rHGP), has recently been shown to have prognostic value. We analyzed HGP in a series of patients operated for CRLM, characterized as OLM in case of prolonged postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) or NOLM in case of rapid postoperative relapse. Methods: In 357 patients operated for CRLM, we identified OLM patients as those with RFS≥5 years (N = 64), and NOLM patients as those with RFS < 1 year (N = 77). Clinicopathologic and surgical parameters were analyzed. In each CRLM, HGP was assessed in archival H&E stained tissue sections, according to international consensus guidelines. Proportions of rHGP and dHGP were determined in each metastasis. In case of multiple metastases, the mean HGP was calculated in each patient. Patients were categorized as pure (> 95% rHGP or dHGP) or dominant phenotypes (> 50% rHGP or dHGP, of the entire tumor-liver interface). Results: Preoperative characteristics of primary tumor and CRLM, and surgical data were identical in OLM and NOLM groups. In a first set of analyses, HGP was determined in 39 OLM and 52 NOLM patients. Pure dHGP was observed in 54.3% of OLM and 17.3% of NOLM patients (p = 0.001). Pure rHGP was similarly distributed among OLM and NOLM groups. Sixty-nine% of the OLM patients displayed a dHGP-dominant phenotype, whereas 57.7% of the NOLM patients presented with a rHGP-dominant phenotype (p = 0.02). Conclusions: These results confirm the potential prognostic value of HGP in patients operated for CRLM. dHGP, associated with angiogenesis and inflammation, could represent a (surrogate) marker for oligometastatic progression, whereas rHGP appears strongly associated with rapid postoperative relapse.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Knoefel ◽  
Brunken ◽  
Neumann ◽  
Gundlach ◽  
Rogiers ◽  
...  

Die komplette chirurgische Entfernung von Lebermetastasen bietet Patienten nach kolorektalem Karzinom die einzige kurative Chance. Es gibt jedoch eine, anscheinend unbegrenzte, Anzahl an Parametern, die die Prognose dieser Patienten bestimmen und damit den Sinn dieser Therapie vorhersagen können. Zu den am häufigsten diskutierten und am einfachsten zu bestimmenden Parametern gehört die Anzahl der Metastasen. Ziel dieser Studie war es daher die Wertigkeit dieses Parameters in der Literatur zu reflektieren und unsere eigenen Patientendaten zu evaluieren. Insgesamt konnte von 302 Patienten ein komplettes Follow-up erhoben werden. Die gebildeten Patientengruppen wurden mit Hilfe einer Kaplan Meier Analyse und konsekutivem log rank Test untersucht. Die Literatur wurde bis Dezember 1998 revidiert. Die Anzahl der Metastasen bestätigte sich als ein prognostisches Kriterium. Lagen drei oder mehr Metastasen vor, so war nicht nur die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer R0 Resektion deutlich geringer (17.8% versus 67.2%) sondern auch das Überleben der Patienten nach einer R0 Resektion tendenziell unwahrscheinlicher. Das 5-Jahres Überleben betrug bei > 2 Metastasen 9% bei > 2 Metastasen 36%. Das 10-Jahres Überleben beträgt bislang bei > 2 Metastasen 0% bei > 2 Metastasen 18% (p < 0.07). Die Anzahl der Metastasen spielt in der Prognose der Patienten mit kolorektalen Lebermetastasen eine Rolle. Selbst bei mehr als vier Metastasen ist jedoch gelegentlich eine R0 Resektion möglich. In diesen Fällen kann der Patient auch langfristig von einer Operation profitieren. Das wichtigere Kriterium einer onkologisch sinnvollen Resektabilität ist die Frage ob technisch und funktionell eine R0 Resektion durchführbar ist. Ist das der Fall, so sollte auch einem Patienten mit mehreren Metastasen die einzige kurative Chance einer Resektion nicht vorenthalten bleiben.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document