Turbine blade cooling, a common practice in modern aircraft engines, is accomplished, among other methods, by passing the cooling air through an often serpentine passage in the core of the blade. Furthermore, to enhance the heat transfer coefficient, these passages are roughened with rib-shaped turbulence promoters (turbulators). Considerable data are available on the heat transfer coefficient on the passage surface between the ribs. However, the heat transfer coefficients on the surface of the ribs themselves have not been investigated to the same extent. In small aircraft engines with small cooling passages and relatively large ribs, the rib surfaces comprise a large portion of the passage heat transfer area. Therefore, an accurate account of the heat transfer coefficient on the rib surfaces is critical in the overall design of the blade cooling system.
The objective of this experimental investigation was to conduct a series of thirteen tests to measure the rib surface-averaged heat transfer coefficient, in a square duct roughened with staggered 90° ribs. To investigate the effects that blockage ratio, e/Dh, and pitch-to-height ratio, S/e, have on hrib and passage friction factor, three rib geometries corresponding to blockage ratios of 0.133. 0.167 and 0.25 were tested for pitch-to-height ratios of 5, 7, 8.5 and 10. Comparisons were made between the rib average heat transfer coefficient and that on the wall surface between two ribs, hflor, reported previously. Heat transfer coefficients of the upstream-most rib and that of a typical rib located in the middle of the rib-roughened region of the passage wall were also compared.
It is concluded that:
1) the rib average heat transfer coefficient is much higher than that for the area between the ribs,
2) similar to the heat transfer coefficient on the surface between the ribs, the average rib heat transfer coefficient increases with the blockage ratio,
3) a pitch-to-height ratios of 8.5 consistently produced the highest rib average heat transfer coefficients amongst all tested,
4) under otherwise identical conditions, ribs in upstream-most position produced lower heat transfer coefficients than the mid-channel positions,
5) the upstream-most rib average heat transfer coefficients decreased with the blockage ratio, and
6) thermal performance decreased with increased blockage ratio. While a pitch-to-height ratio of 8.5 and 10 had the highest thermal performance for the smallest rib geometry, thermal performance of high blockage ribs did not change significantly with the pitch-to-height ratio.
Field testing of the QUB method for assessing the thermal performance of dwellings: In situ measurements of the heat transfer coefficient of a circa 1950s detached house in UK
