Relationship between skin temperature and medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S614-S617
Author(s):  
Sintawati Majid ◽  
Saldy Yusuf ◽  
Yuliana Syam ◽  
Muhammad Darwis ◽  
Deliaty Bagenda Ali
Author(s):  
Yeong-Mi Seong ◽  
Hyejin Lee ◽  
Ji Min Seo

We developed and tested the effectiveness of an algorithm to prevent medical device–related pressure injuries in intensive care unit patients. It was developed in four stages: literature review and analysis of medical records; preliminary algorithm development; validation of the preliminary algorithm by experts in two rounds; and practical feasibility verification of the revised algorithm by 109 intensive care unit nurses. To verify the algorithm’s effectiveness, we compared the incidence of medical device–related pressure injuries between 324 patients without algorithm application (control group) and 312 patients with algorithm application (experimental group). The outcomes were skin inspection of the medical device attachment, pressure injury evaluation, and implementation of pressure injury-preventive nursing care, based on the medical device type. The incidence rates were 1.46 per 100 devices (control group) and 1.19 per 100 devices (experimental group). Since there was no homogeneity in the previous score of the Braden scale in the experimental and control groups, the results regarding the incidence of pressure damage after applying the algorithm should be interpreted with care. Applying this algorithm was a safe intervention that helped prevent medical device–related pressure injuries in this population.


Author(s):  
Nima Ahmadi ◽  
Farzan Sasangohar ◽  
Tariq Nisar ◽  
Valerie Danesh ◽  
Ethan Larsen ◽  
...  

Objective To identify physiological correlates to stress in intensive care unit nurses. Background Most research on stress correlates are done in laboratory environments; naturalistic investigation of stress remains a general gap. Method Electrodermal activity, heart rate, and skin temperatures were recorded continuously for 12-hr nursing shifts (23 participants) using a wrist-worn wearable technology (Empatica E4). Results Positive correlations included stress and heart rate (ρ = .35, p < .001), stress and skin temperature (ρ = .49, p < .05), and heart rate and skin temperatures (ρ = .54, p = .0008). Discussion The presence and direction of some correlations found in this study differ from those anticipated from prior literature, illustrating the importance of complementing laboratory research with naturalistic studies. Further work is warranted to recognize nursing activities associated with a high level of stress and the underlying reasons associated with changes in physiological responses. Application Heart rate and skin temperature may be used for real-time detection of stress, but more work is needed to validate such surrogate measures.


Author(s):  
Jacqueline Marques Rodrigues ◽  
Kemily Covre Gregório ◽  
Ursula Marcondes Westin ◽  
Danielle Garbuio

Objectives: identify the incidence and characterize pressure injuries in an adult intensive care unit regarding the occurrence, locations and risk factors, and verify whether there is an association between these and the appearance of the injuries. Method: observational, cohort, prospective study, developed in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital, from October to December 2019. The population consists of adults on the first day of admission to the unit, without pressure injury at admission. Participants were monitored during hospitalization, sociodemographic and clinical variables, and risk assessment of developing a pressure injury, skin assessment and Braden scale were collected daily. Pearson’s chi-square tests and student’s t-test were used to assessing the relationship between variables and injuries. For the analyzes, a significance level (α) of 5% was considered. Results: 40 participants were included, 20% had pressure injuries with a predominance of stages 1 and 2; the main affected sites were the sacral region followed by the calcaneus. The average hospital stay was 23.38 days for the injured group and 5.77 days for the non-injured group; time showed a significant relationship with the appearance of lesions (p = 0.002). Conclusion: it was concluded that the most affected site was the sacral region and grade 1 was the most frequent staging; length of stay was the variable that influenced the appearance of injuries.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-51
Author(s):  
Marisa Raynaldo

Practice Problem: Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury (HAPI) is a serious problem in patient care and has deleterious implications for the patient and the healthcare system. A 530-bed acute care hospital in the Rio Grande Valley identified a similar challenge and implemented a HAPI preventive program. PICOT: This evidence-based practice (EBP) project was guided by the following PICOT question: In the Intensive Care Unit/Medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU/MICU) patients aged 18 and older, does a pressure preventive bundle, compared to routine pressure injury care, reduce the incidence of pressure injury, within 21 days? Evidence: The reviewed literature supported evidence of effective use of a pressure injury preventive bundle in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries in an acute care setting. Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were used for this literature review. Intervention: The evidence-based pressure injury preventive bundle are interventions that included consistent skin risk assessment and the application of a group of clinical practice guidelines composing of moisture management, optimizing nutrition and hydration and minimizing pressure, shear, and friction that were proven to prevent the occurrence of pressure injuries. Outcome: Post-implementation findings showed that there was no reduction in the incidence of HAPI but significant decrease in the severity of the pressure injury from Stage two to Stage one. Conclusion: The staff education, training, and implementation of an evidence-based bundle intervention to prevent the incidence of HAPI proved a positive outcome on reducing the pressure injury severity from Stage Two pressure injuries to Stage One pressure injuries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document