Percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patient versus younger patients: Risk profile during hospital stay

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
J. Piqueras Flores ◽  
V. Hernández Jiménez ◽  
V. Mazoteras Muñoz ◽  
M.T. López Lluva ◽  
A. Moreno Arciniegas ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
James X Cai ◽  
Jonathan Yap ◽  
Fei Gao ◽  
Tian Hai Koh ◽  
Khim Leng Tong ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is limited information on elderly patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to study the outcomes of elderly Asian patients with STEMI compared to younger patients. Materials and Methods: The study utilised data from 2007 to 2012 from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry, a mandatory national population-based registry. Elderly patients were defined as ≥80 years of age, middle-aged to old (MAO) patients were defined as 45–80 years of age and young patients were defined as ≤45 years of age. The primary outcome of the study was 1-year mortality and secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications and mortality. Results: There were 12,409 STEMI patients with 1207 (9.7%) elderly patients, 10,093 (81.3%) MAO patients and 1109 (8.9%) young patients. Elderly patients had more cardiovascular risk factors and lower rates of total percutaneous coronary intervention (26.0% vs 72.4% vs 85.5%, respectively; P <0.0001) compared to MAO and young patients. They had higher 1-year mortality (60.6% vs 18.3% vs 4.1%, respectively; P <0.0001) when compared to MAO and young patients. Conclusion: Elderly patients with STEMI have poorer outcomes than MAO and young patients. This is potentially attributable to a myriad of factors including age, higher burden of comorbidities and a lesser likelihood of receiving revascularisation and guideline-recommended medical therapy. Keywords: Coronary artery bypass graft, Percutaneous coronary intervention


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ferlini ◽  
R Rossini ◽  
G Musumeci ◽  
N Grieco ◽  
D Trabattoni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Redundant clinical and non-invasive examinations after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increase the cost of medical care with no outcome improve. A multidisciplinary consensus document (MCD) providing a follow-up (FU) strategy based on 3 clinical and angiographic risk profile (A high, B intermediate, and C low) has been recently proposed. Aim To evaluate the potential reduction of cardiologic consults (CC), stress tests (ST), and echocardiograms (EC) with the application of the MCD after PCI. Methods The Post-PCI registry is a multicenter, observational, prospective data collection carried out during a four-week period that included consecutive patients undergoing PCI at 31 Italian Hospitals both for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). FU strategies were left at investigator's discretion. A comparison between the CC, ST and EC performed in the first 12-months with the potential suggested by the MCD was evaluated. Results A total of 1113 patients were included; 12-months follow up was available in 90% of the cases (mean age 68±11 years old, 58% ACS). Based on MCD risk profile 17% were in A, 74% in B and 9% in C strategy. On average observed CC and ST were significantly lower compared to the expected based on MCD (respectively 1.63±1.07 vs 1.91±0.28, and 0.41±0.59 vs 0.61±0.84; on the contrary EC were significantly higher (0.64±0.73 vs 0.34±0.75, all: p<0.001). The excess rate for CC, ST and EC as compared to MCD was respectively 25%, 14% and 8% for the strategy A, 14%, 25% and 50% for the strategy B and 26%, 54% and 40% for the strategy C. At multivariable logistic analysis the MCD strategy was an independent predictor (in a model with age, sex, consulting physician, public or private hospital) of an increased number of cardiac examination in patients at intermediated and low risk [B group OR 2.56 (95% CI 1.38–4.75), C group 27.00 (95% CI 8.13–89.62)]. The other independent predictor was age, with a reduced number of examination for elderly (>75 years old) patients [OR 0.59 (CI 95% 0.43–0.80)]. Conclusion Our data suggest that in a real word population of patients undergoing PCI, a follow-up strategy based on clinical and anatomical risk profile would allow to a reduction of cardiac tests and consultations, particularly in patients at intermediated and low risk leading to an increase of appropriateness of prescription and to a cost reduction of medical care. Acknowledgement/Funding The Post-PCI registry was supported by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) receiving an unrestricted grant from Astra Zeneca


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document