Profile of users of a new E-Mental Health ecological momentary assessment web-based program: MEmind

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S111-S112
Author(s):  
C. Bonal ◽  
M.L. Barrigon ◽  
J.J. Carballo ◽  
E. Baca-Garcia ◽  

Backgrounde-Mental Health is an emergent area within e-Health. In the evaluation area, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has been used to investigate separately on different psychiatric disorders while a comprehensive tool to cover the entire spectrum of mental health has not yet been developed. In this study, we aimed to present the MEmind wellness tracker and to characterize the group of patients who use it.MethodsWe developed an EMA web application: MEmind, accessed through the web page http://www.memind.net. Since 20th May 2014 on, adult outpatients (n = 13,883) attended in all psychiatric services within the Psychiatry Department of Fundación Jimenez Diaz in Madrid were proposed to use MEmind and then registered. Data collected from first year of implementation of the tool were transferred to an SPSS sheet and then analysed. A comparison between patients using and not using MEmind were performed.ResultsMEmind users (n = 2842) were significantly younger than MEmind non-users (n = 11,041) (42.2 ± 13.5 vs. 48.5 ± 16.3; P = 0.000) and mostly women (65% vs. 61.4%; P = 0.001). Also, patients with neurotic disorders were the main users of MEmind (see Table 1). Furthermore, patients with thoughts about death and suicide were more likely to use MEmind (Table 2).ConclusionsWomen, young people and patients with neurotic disorder were the main users of MEmind. Furthermore, people with suicidal thoughts were willing to use MEmind. Novel interventions for suicide prevention could be developed with the use of EMA web-based tools. Further studies are warranted.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

2020 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 113359
Author(s):  
Molly Gromatsky ◽  
Sarah R. Sullivan ◽  
Angela Page Spears ◽  
Emily Mitchell ◽  
Samantha Walsh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Magallón-Neri ◽  
Teresa Kirchner-Nebot ◽  
Maria Forns-Santacana ◽  
Caterina Calderón ◽  
Irina Planellas

2021 ◽  
pp. 216770262110178
Author(s):  
Eiko I. Fried ◽  
Faidra Papanikolaou ◽  
Sacha Epskamp

For many students, the COVID-19 pandemic caused once-in-a-lifetime disruptions of daily life. In March 2020, during the beginning of the outbreak in the Netherlands, we used ecological momentary assessment to follow 80 undergraduate students four times per day for 14 days to assess mental health, social contact, and COVID-19-related variables. Despite rapidly increasing rates of infections and deaths, we observed decreases in anxiety, loneliness, and COVID-19-related concerns, especially in the first few days. Other mental health variables, such as stress levels, remained stable, whereas depressive symptoms increased. Despite social-distancing measures implemented by the Dutch government halfway through our study, students showed no changes in the frequency of in-person social activities. Dynamic network models identified potential vicious cycles between mental health variables and being alone, which predicted concerns about COVID-19 and was followed by further mental health problems. Findings and implications are discussed in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document