New Hospital, Old Tricks: Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department of a Newly Opened Tertiary Hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. S128-S129
Author(s):  
J. Bowyer ◽  
J. Marangou ◽  
V. Paul
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Tertiary Hospital

scholarly journals Assessment of atrial fibrillation in emergency department

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Manzo-Silberman ◽  
T Chouihed ◽  
L Fraticelli ◽  
A Peiretti ◽  
C Claustre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Private Company

Abstract Introduction Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrythmia, especially in older adults. AF represents 1% of emergency department (ED) visits a third of which are de novo or recurrent. While the diagnosis is given quickly by reading the electrocardiogram (ECG), its management both remains complex. European guidelines have been published in 2016. Purpose Our study aimed to investigate guidelines implementation in French ED. Methods Prospective national multicenter study (clinical trials NCT 03836339) and core interpretation of ECG. Consecutive patients admitted in 32 French ED for AF confirmed by ECG were prospectively included. Clinical characteristics at admission were recorded by the physician. The 3-months telephone follow-up was ensured by one operator. Results From 1/10/2018 to 30/11/2018, 1369 patients with AF were included, of whom 295 (21.55%) had a de novo AF. Patients were 80 [65; 87] years old, 51.17% of men, 71.53% self-ruling, 91.53% living at home, 65.42% transported by firemen or by ambulances and 4,07% by a mobile intensive care unit. Twenty-six (8.84%) patients had a history of stroke or transient ischemic stroke and none of them on anticoagulants. CHA2DS2-VASC score was performed in 66.78% of patients and was 0 in 14 (7.11%) patients. HAS-BLED score = 2 [1; 3]. At admission 50.17% of patients received anticoagulants, of whom 49.32% a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, 0.68% Vitamin K antagonists, 50.68% UFH or LMWH. Beta-blockers were administered in 102 (24.01%) patients and amiodarone in 38 (12.89%). Cardiac echography has been performed in 20.34% of patients. Atrial fibrillation was the primary diagnosis in 42.71% of patients. It has been associated to a pneumopathy in 25.17% of patients, a pulmonary embolism in 4.76% and acute alcoholism in 1.36% of them. Precipitating factor was often undetermined. The discharge to the home concerned 18.64% of patients, 26.78% of patients were hospitalized in ED hospitalization unit, 23.05% in cardiology or intensive care unit. At 3 months, 49% of patients were on anticoagulants, of whom 90% on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, 95% of them didn't report any bleeding event and 41.77% of them were able to have a cardiology consultation within three months. Three-months mortality was about 22.09%, and rehospitalization rate about 22.89%. Conclusion It seems to be a reticence to initiate anticoagulation of patients admitted to ED with a de novo AF. It could be explained by both the advanced age of the patients and the lack of an organized access to a systematic cardiology consultation at discharge. Patients with chronic AF are subject to high mortality at 3 months and a significant risk of readmission. The application of the guidelines could be optimized by a better training program and the implementation of a dedicated pathway of care. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bayer

scholarly journals Clinical predictors and angiographic features of acute coronary syndromes caused by systemic embolism

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jeronimo Baza ◽  
C Salazar ◽  
M.J Perez Vyzcaino ◽  
L Nombela ◽  
P Jimenez Quevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Valvular Surgery ◽  
Coronary Syndromes

Abstract Introduction Systemic embolism to coronary arteries is one of the mechanisms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of non-atherosclerotic cause. However, its clinical profile has not been properly established yet. Purpose To identify clinical predictors and angiographic characteristics of acute coronary syndromes caused by systemic embolism to a principal coronary artery (ACS-E), as well as to describe in-hospital mortality of these patients. Methods 40 patients with ACS-E, admitted between 2003 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital. Epidemiological, clinical and angiographic characteristics of these cases were compared with those from 4989 patients, attended for acute coronary syndrome of atherosclerotic cause (ACS-A) in the same hospital during the same period. Results Patients with ACS-E were younger (28% vs 10% were <45 years old, p<0.001) and had a higher proportion of women (43% vs 22%, p 0.003), atrial fibrillation (40% vs 5%, p<0.001) and neoplasia (18% vs 7%, p 0.009). They had also undergone previous valvular surgery more frequently than patients with ACS-A (13% vs 0.5%, p<0.001) and a higher proportion of them were under treatment with warfarin (15% vs 3%, p<0.001). Variables identified as independent predictors of ACS-E in the multivariate analysis are shown in the table. Regarding clinical presentation, ST elevation AMI was more frequent in ACS-E cases (83% vs 67%, p 0.04). Patients with ACS-E did not present any significative stenosis in other vessels apart from the culprit one (number of other vessels with at least 1 severe stenosis was 0 in the ACS-E group vs 1.33 + 1 in the ACS-A arm, p<0.001). PCI was attempted in 75% of the patients with ACS-E, resulting successful in 80% of the cases. On the other hand, 100% of SCA-A underwent PCI, with a success proportion of 99% (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality in ACS-E group was 15% and 4% in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusions ACS-E and ACS-A have different clinical and angiographic features. Atrial fibrillation, chronic warfarin treatment, previous valvular surgery, presence of any neoplasia and female sex are independent predictors for ACS-E. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Occupational Sharp Injury and Splash Exposure among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshan Mathew ◽  
Ritin Mohindra ◽  
Ankit Sahu ◽  
Rachana Bhat ◽  
Akshaya Ramaswami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Needle Stick Injury ◽  
Medical Procedures ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus Antibody

Abstract Background Occupational hazards like sharp injury and splash exposure (SISE) are frequently encountered in health-care settings. The adoption of standard precautions by healthcare workers (HCWs) has led to significant reduction in the incidence of such injuries, still SISE continues to pose a serious threat to certain groups of HCWs. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study which examined the available records of all patients from January 2015 to August 2019 who self-reported to our emergency department with history of sharp injury and/or splash exposure. Details of the patients, mechanism of injury, the circumstances leading to the injury, status of the source (hepatitis B surface antigen, human immunodeficiency virus, and hepatitis C virus antibody status), and the postexposure prophylaxis given were recorded and analyzed. Data were represented in frequency and percentages. Results During the defined period, a total of 834 HCWs reported with SISE, out of which 44.6% were doctors. Majority of the patients have SISE while performing medical procedures on patients (49.5%), while 19.2% were exposed during segregation of waste. The frequency of needle stick injury during cannulation, sampling, and recapping of needle were higher in emergency department than in wards. More than 80% of HCWs received hepatitis B vaccine and immunoglobulin postexposure. Conclusion There is need for periodical briefings on practices of sharp handling as well as re-emphasizing the use of personal protective equipment while performing procedures.

Atrioesophageal Fistula as a Complication of Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Mustafa Emin Canakci ◽  
Cengiz Ovali ◽  
İrem Aydogdu ◽  
Betul Tiryaki Bastug ◽  
Obaidullah Ahmadzai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Male Patient ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Important Complication ◽  
Atrioesophageal Fistula

Abstract Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is an important complication of radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Delayed diagnosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the name “atrioesophageal fistula,” fistulas functionally act esophageal to atrial, which accounts for the neurologic and infectious complications. This report presents the management of a 60-year-old male patient who was admitted to the emergency department (ED) with AEF-caused gastrointestinal bleeding. The patient was operated urgently, but he had serious comorbidities and died after the operation. The aim of this case was to evaluate patients who underwent RFA, within 10 days to two months, carefully in the ED and to know the possible complications.

scholarly journals Rhythm and rate control of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department – A large community-based observational study

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 834-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron J. Gilbert ◽  
Paul Angaran ◽  
Zana Mariano ◽  
Theresa Aves ◽  
Paul Dorian
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
Control Factors ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Canadian City

AbstractObjectiveAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia presentation to the emergency department (ED) and frequently results in admission to the hospital. Although rarely life-threatening and not usually an emergent condition, AF places a large burden on our health-care system. The objective of this study was to describe the practices of ED physicians in the management of AF in a large urban Canadian city.MethodsFrom January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, patients with a primary diagnosis of AF were identified across 10 EDs in Toronto, Canada (N=2,609). Fifty patients were selected at random from each hospital for a detailed chart review (n=500).ResultsTwo hundred thirty-two patients (46%) received rate control, and 129 (26%) received rhythm control with the remainder (28%) receiving neither therapy. Sixty-seven percent of patients were discharged home. Most patients (79%) were symptomatic on arrival; however, only a minority of these (31%) received rhythm control. Factors that were associated with rhythm control included younger age, duration of palpitations ≤ 48 hours, a lower CHADS2 score, and the absence of left ventricular dysfunction.ConclusionOur data suggest a wide range of practice amongst ED physicians treating patients presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AF. A randomized trial is needed to better understand the optimal management strategy in this patient population and setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document