Durability of posterior wall isolation after catheter ablation among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1740-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Markman ◽  
Matthew C. Hyman ◽  
Ramanan Kumareswaran ◽  
Jeffrey S. Arkles ◽  
Pasquale Santangeli ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Usama A. Daimee ◽  
Tauseef Akhtar ◽  
Thomas A. Boyle ◽  
Leah Jager ◽  
Armin Arbab‐Zadeh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mohanty ◽  
C Trivedi ◽  
D G Della Rocca ◽  
C Gianni ◽  
B MacDonald ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Radiofrequency catheter ablation, a widely recognized therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation (AF) has limited success rate as it is influenced by several factors including duration of AF. Purpose We evaluated the ablation success in AF patients intervened early versus late in the disease course. Methods Consecutive AF patients undergoing their first catheter ablation in 2015–16 at our center were included in the analysis. Patients were classified into two groups based on the time to ablation after AF diagnosis; 1) early: ≤12 months and 2) late: >12 months. All received PV isolation plus isolation of posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, in non-paroxysmal AF cases, non-PV triggers were identified with isoproterenol-challenge and ablated. Patients were prospectively followed up for 3 years with regular rhythm monitoring. Results A total of 752 and 1248 patients were included in the “early” and “late” group respectively. Baseline characteristics of the study population is provided in Table 1 A. At 4 years of follow-up, overall success rate off-antiarrhythmic drugs was significantly higher in the “early” group (65.4% vs 57%, p<0.001). After stratification by AF type, “early” group was still associated with significantly higher success rate compared to the “late” group (Table 1B). Conclusion In this large series with standardized ablation strategy, early intervention with catheter ablation was associated with higher success rate in all AF types. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahitya Allam ◽  
Evan Harmon ◽  
Sula Mazimba ◽  
James M Mangrum ◽  
Ilana Kutinsky ◽  
...  

Background: Recent randomized clinical trial data has supported catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF). Ablation and fluid management strategies could impact periprocedural outcomes especially in HF patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients with and without HF undergoing CA at a tertiary care academic center from July 2017 through June 2018. HF was defined as any EF < 40%, prior inpatient admission for HF exacerbation, or ambulatory management of HF confirmed by independent chart review. Diuretic regimens were reported as furosemide equivalent. Results: Among 200 patients, 65 (32.5%) had HF and 135 (67.5%) did not. HF patients had longer mean procedure times (299.8 ± 96 min vs 268.4 ± 96 min, p = 0.03) and were more likely to require mitral isthmus (p < 0.001), posterior wall isolation (p = 0.002), and cavotriscupid isthmus (p = 0.004) ablations. There were no differences between the HF vs. non-HF groups’ intraprocedural volume intake, intraprocedural volume output, net fluid status, or intraprocedural diuretic dose (Table 1). HF patients received higher doses of IV (41.5 ± 43.0 mg vs 23.6 ± 11.8 mg, p = 0.007) and PO (43.2 ± 16.7 mg vs 26.7 ± 10.0 mg, p < 0.001) postprocedural diuretic. There were no differences in the rates of major in-hospital complications (Table 1). In a multivariable regression analysis adjusted for procedural covariates, there were higher proportions of posterior wall isolation (p = 0.01) as well as postprocedural PO (p = 0.01) and IV diuretic (p = 0.002) administration in the HF cohort. Conclusion: Intraprocedural volume and diuretic management was similar between HF and non-HF patients undergoing CA of AF, though HF patients tended to receive more aggressive diuresis post procedurally with no difference in complications. Table 1. Intra- and post-procedural management and outcomes in HF vs non-HF patients undergoing CA for AF


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1874-1876
Author(s):  
Emrie Tomaiko ◽  
Andrew Tseng ◽  
William B. Reichert ◽  
Wilber W. Su

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangang Wang ◽  
Songnan Li ◽  
Qing Ye ◽  
Xiaolong Ma ◽  
Yichen Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aimed to describe the mid-term outcomes of different treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation caused tricuspid regurgitation. Methods A retrospective study of patients diagnosed as atrial fibrillation caused moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing ablation (n = 411) were reviewed. The surgical cohort (n = 114) underwent surgical ablation and tricuspid valve repair; the catheter cohort (n = 279) was selected from those patients who had catheter ablation. Results The estimated actuarial 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95% CI: 92.95–97.78) and 92.0% (95% CI: 85.26–95.78) in the catheter and surgical cohort, respectively. Tethering height was showed as independent risk factors for recurrent atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation in both cohorts. A matched group analysis using propensity-matched was conducted after categorizing total patients by tethering height < 6 mm and ≥ 6 mm. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed in patients with tethering height < 6 mm, there were no differences in survival from mortality, stroke, recurrent atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation between two groups. In patients with tethering height ≥ 6 mm, there were significantly higher cumulative incidence of stroke (95% CI, 0.047–0.849; P = 0.029), recurrent atrial fibrillation (95% CI, 0.357–09738; P = 0.039) and tricuspid regurgitation (95% CI, 0.359–0.981; P = 0.042) in catheter group. Conclusions Atrial fibrillation caused tricuspid regurgitation resulted in less leaflets coaptation, which risk the recurrence of atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. Patients whose tethering height was less than 6 mm showed satisfying improvement in tricuspid regurgitation with the restoration of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation. However, in patients with severe leaflets tethering, the results favored surgical over catheter.


Heart ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tokuda ◽  
T. Yamane ◽  
S. Matsuo ◽  
K. Ito ◽  
R. Narui ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document