Non-achievement of LDL-cholesterol targets in patients with diabetes at very-high cardiovascular risk receiving statin treatment: Incidence and risk factors

Abstract Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD Annals initiative. Patients with T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. General descriptive indicators, measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. Results Overall, 473,740 subjects with type 2 diabetes (78.5% at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and 0.6% at moderate risk) were evaluated. Among people with T2D at very high risk: 26.4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors. The use of DPP4-i markedly increased as cardiovascular risk increased. The prescription of secretagogues also increased and that of GLP1-RAs tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i was still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. The overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased. Conclusions A large proportion of subjects with T2D is at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to their potential advantages in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care.

Download Full-text

Patterns of care of subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes according to their cardiovascular risk

The Journal of AMD ◽

10.36171/jamd20.23.4.12 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 30

Author(s):

Pintaudi, B.

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

Cardiovascular Risk ◽

High Risk ◽

Quality Indicators ◽

High Cardiovascular Risk ◽

Very High

AIM OF THE STUDY To explore the distribution by cardiovascular risk groups according to the classification promoted by the ESC (European Society of Cardiology) of subjects with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes cared for by Italian diabetologists and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN AND METHODS The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 diabetes centers participating in the Annals AMD initiative and active in the year 2018. Patients with T1D or T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk, in accordance with the recent ESC guidelines. General descriptive indicators and measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 29,368 adults with T1D and 473,740 subjects with T2D were evaluated. Among subjects with T1D: 64.7% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 28.5% at high risk and the remaining 6.8% at moderate risk. Among subjects with T1D at very high-risk: 54.7% had retinopathy, 29.0% had albuminuria, 7.3% had a history of major cardiovascular event, 47.3% had organ damage, 48.9% had three or more risk factors, and 70.6% had a diabetes duration of over 20 years. Among subjects with T2D: 78.5% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and the remaining 0.6% at moderate risk. Among those with T2D at very high risk: 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 26,4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria. With regard to the glucose-lowering drugs: the use of DPPIV-i increased markedly as cardiovascular risk increased; the use of secretagogues also increased and, although within low percentages, also the use of GLP1-RA tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i is also still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. In both types of diabetes, the overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score values, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular riskincreased. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of a large population such as that of the AMD Annals database allowed to highlight the characteristics and quality indicators of care of subjects with T1D and T2D in relation to cardiovascular risk classes. A large proportion of subjects appear to be at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to the potential advantages in terms of reduction of cardiovascular risk of some drug categories (GLP1-RA and SGLT2-i) and, conversely, with respect to the potential risks related to the use of other pharmacological classes (sulfonylureas). Several actions are necessary to optimize care and improve the quality of care for both subjects with T1D and T2D. KEY WORDS type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes; cardiovascular risk; quality indicators of care.

Download Full-text

Guideline Concordance of Statin Treatment Decisions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9113719 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (11) ◽

pp. 3719

Author(s):

Yael Rachamin ◽

Stefan Markun ◽

Thomas Grischott ◽

Thomas Rosemann ◽

Rahel Meier

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Cardiovascular Risk ◽

General Practitioners ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Small Deviation ◽

Statin Treatment ◽

Treatment Decisions ◽

High Cardiovascular Risk ◽

Very High

Guidelines recommend initiation of statins depending on cardiovascular risk and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to assess guideline concordance of statin treatment decisions and to find determinants of undertreatment in Swiss primary care in the period 2016–2019. We drew on electronic medical records of 8060 statin-naive patients (50.0% female, median age 59 years) with available LDL-C levels and cardiovascular risk. Guideline concordance was assessed based on the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, and multilevel logistic regression was performed to find determinants of undertreatment. We found that statin treatment was initiated in 10.2% of patients during one year of follow up. Treatment decisions were classified as guideline-concordant in 63.0%, as undertreatment in 35.8% and as overtreatment in 1.2%. Among determinants of undertreatment were small deviation from LDL-C treatment thresholds (odds ratio per decrease by 1 mmol/L: 2.09 [95% confidence interval 1.87–2.35]), high compared with very high cardiovascular risk (1.64 [1.30–2.05]), female sex (1.31 [1.05–1.64]), and being treated by older general practitioners (per 10 year decrease: 0.74 [0.61–0.90]). In conclusion, undertreatment of patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk was common, but general practitioners considered cardiovascular risk and LDL-C in their treatment decisions.

Download Full-text

Real-World Effectiveness of Therapy With Rosuvastatin Combined With Fenofibric Acid in a Sample of Colombian Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health ◽

10.1177/2150132720977733 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

pp. 215013272097773

Author(s):

Manuel E. Machado-Duque ◽

Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza ◽

Jorge E. Machado-Alba

Keyword(s):

Cardiovascular Risk ◽

High Risk ◽

Lipid Profile ◽

Ldl Cholesterol ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Lower Probability ◽

Fenofibric Acid ◽

High Cardiovascular Risk ◽

Mixed Dyslipidemia ◽

Very High

Background Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the world and is associated with dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and other factors. Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness on the lipid profile of the rosuvastatin + fenofibric acid combination in Colombian patients with high cardiovascular risk and mixed dyslipidemia. Methods Longitudinal observational study in a random sample of patients with a diagnosis of mixed dyslipidemia and moderate, high, or very high cardiovascular risk who were treated with rosuvastatin + fenofibric acid. Anthropometric, clinical, laboratory, comorbidity, and pharmacological variables were identified. Effectiveness on the lipid profile was determined. Results A total of 386 patients were analyzed. They had a mean age of 60.8 ± 11.4 years, 53.1% were female, and 75.6% had high/very high cardiovascular risk. The initial evaluation showed a mean LDL cholesterol of 138.4 ± 67.1 mg/dL and triglycerides of 679.7 ± 573.6 mg/dL. At the end of follow-up, mean LDL cholesterol was 87.5 ± 41.2 mg/dL (reduced by 43.3%; P < .001), and triglycerides were 243.5 ± 170.5 mg/dL (reduced by 64.2%; P < .001). Only 35.4% (n = 73) of patients with very high risk reached the goal of metabolic control, compared to 61.6% (n = 53) with high risk and 55.4% (n = 46) with moderate risk. Belonging to the very high-risk group was associated with a lower probability of achieving the control goal (OR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.192-0.539). Conclusion The combination of rosuvastatin + fenofibric acid is an effective option in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and high cardiovascular risk, providing a therapeutic alternative for those conditions that require it.

Download Full-text

P3396Identification of patients at extremely-high cardiovascular risk within a very-high risk population from the TERCET Registry

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0272 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

K Dyrbus ◽

M Gasior ◽

M Skrzypek ◽

T Osadnik ◽

P Desperak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Cardiovascular Risk ◽

High Risk ◽

High Cardiovascular Risk ◽

St Segment Elevation ◽

St Segment ◽

Ultra High Risk ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Very High

Abstract Background The latest guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) introduced a new “ultra-high risk” category of patients, for whom a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level <55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) is advised. Purpose Based on the above, we aimed to identify the proportion of patients, who are at ultra-high/extremely-high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Method Finally, we analyzed the data of 19,781 consecutive patients included in theHyperlipidaemia Therapy in the tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry admitted to the Polish tertiary cardiovascular centre between 2006 and 2018. Among them, there were 7,319 patients admitted with ACS: 3,085 due to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 2,256 due to non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 1,978 due to unstable angina (UA), as well as 12,462 due to stable angina (SA). According to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), all patients included in the Registry are at very high CV risk. All of the patients included in the registry underwent coronary angiography during the hospital stay. On the basis of the multivariate analysis, we aimed at determining the subgroup of the patients with the most unfavourable 12-month outcomes and therefore to indicate the risk factors responsible for extremely-high CV risk. Results According to the results of the multivariate analysis performed with stepwise backward regression, we identified the following risk factors: LVEF<40% (odds ratio [OR]=3.51, 95% CI: 2.87–4.29), prior stroke (OR=2.28, 95% CI: 1.65–3.01), diabetic nephropathy (OR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.68–2.77), age>75 years (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.33–2.55), atrial fibrillation (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.45–2.25), acute MI at admission (OR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.26–1.95), multivessel CAD (OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.15–1.72), prior MI (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.07–1.60) and lower body-mass index (OR=1.02 per 1 kg/m2+ less, 95% CI: 1.00–1.04) that might help to define the group of very high risk patients, who should be considered as of extremely-high cardiovascular risk (all p<0.05). The aggregate summary of risk factors associated with “ultra-high” risk is presented in the attached Figure. Multivariate analysis results Conclusions To our best knowledge, the presented study is the first such an analysis conducted on such a large population of very-high cardiovascular risk patients gathered in the registry of secondary cardiovascular prevention. In very-high cardiovascular risk patients, potential risk factors were identified that might help to establish the group of individuals at extremely high CV risk what contributes to higher 12-month mortality. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Download Full-text