A new approach for estimation of the skin friction in turbulent boundary layer under the adverse pressure gradient conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 108456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Niegodajew ◽  
Artur Dróżdż ◽  
Witold Elsner
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
New Approach

Direct measurements of skin friction in a turbulent boundary layer with a strong adverse pressure gradient

1980 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Frei ◽  
H. Thomann
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Circular Cross Section ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Small Element ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Local Pressure ◽  
Friction Forces

This paper describes a new balance, suitable for direct measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers with severe pressure gradients. The gaps between the floating element and the surrounding wall are filled with a liquid in order to eliminate disturbing pressure forces on the element. The resulting friction forces are measured with piezo-electric transducers with high sensitivity and extremely small element displacement.Skin friction measurements were taken in the turbulent boundary layer of a wind tunnel with circular cross-section at M [les ] 0·25. Severe adverse pressure gradients were generated by means of a step on the wall or, alternatively, by a conical centre body.The new apparatus was mainly used to investigate the error of Preston tubes in adverse pressure gradients. It was necessary to develop a new measuring technique to improve the repeatability of the Preston tube readings.The Preston tube error was found to depend on both the local pressure gradient P = (dp/dx) ν/ρ3τ and on the Preston tube diameter uτd/ν and to be independent of the upstream pressure distribution for the range of parameters covered by the experiments.

A New Integral Method for Analyzing the Turbulent Boundary Layer With Arbitrary Pressure Gradient

1969 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. White
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Single Equation ◽  
Skin Friction Coefficient ◽  
New Method ◽  
Momentum Thickness ◽  
New Approach

For routine calculations of the properties of the incompressible turbulent boundary layer with arbitrary pressure gradient, the presently accepted method is the Karman integral technique, which consists of three simultaneous equations, the three unknowns being the momentum thickness, the skin friction, and the shape factor. Considerable empiricism is contained in the Karman method, so that the reliability is only fair. The present paper derives an entirely new method, based upon a suggestion of R. Brand and L. Persen. The new approach results in a single equation for the skin friction coefficient, with the only parameter being the nominal Reynolds number and the only empiricism being a single assumption about the effect of pressure gradient. No other variables, such as shape factor or momentum thickness, are needed, although they can of course be calculated as byproducts of the analysis. The new method also contains a built-in separation criterion, which was the most glaring omission of the Karman technique. Agreement with experiment is as good or better than the most reliable Karman methods in use today.

The accelerated fully rough turbulent boundary layer

1977 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh W. Coleman ◽  
Robert J. Moffat ◽  
William M. Kays
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stress Tensor ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Mean Velocity

The behaviour of a fully rough turbulent boundary layer subjected to favourable pressure gradients both with and without blowing was investigated experimentally using a porous test surface composed of densely packed spheres of uniform size. Measurements of profiles of mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are reported for both unblown and blown layers. Skin-friction coefficients were determined from measurements of the Reynolds shear stress and mean velocity.An appropriate acceleration parameterKrfor fully rough layers is defined which is dependent on a characteristic roughness dimension but independent of molecular viscosity. For a constant blowing fractionFgreater than or equal to zero, the fully rough turbulent boundary layer reaches an equilibrium state whenKris held constant. Profiles of the mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are then similar in the flow direction and the skin-friction coefficient, momentum thickness, boundary-layer shape factor and the Clauser shape factor and pressure-gradient parameter all become constant.Acceleration of a fully rough layer decreases the normalized turbulent kinetic energy and makes the turbulence field much less isotropic in the inner region (forFequal to zero) compared with zero-pressure-gradient fully rough layers. The values of the Reynolds-shear-stress correlation coefficients, however, are unaffected by acceleration or blowing and are identical with values previously reported for smooth-wall and zero-pressure-gradient rough-wall flows. Increasing values of the roughness Reynolds number with acceleration indicate that the fully rough layer does not tend towards the transitionally rough or smooth-wall state when accelerated.

A Superposition Analysis of the Turbulent Boundary Layer in an Adverse Pressure Gradient

1951 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
Donald Ross ◽  
J. M. Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Wall Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Recovery ◽  
Stress Coefficient ◽  
Wall Shear

Abstract As an interim solution to the problem of the turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient, a super-position method of analysis has been developed. In this method, the velocity profile is considered to be the result of two effects: the wall shear stress and the pressure recovery. These are superimposed, yielding an expression for the velocity profiles which approximate measured distributions. The theory also leads to a more reasonable expression for the wall shear-stress coefficient.

Predicting Turbulent Boundary Layer Wall Pressure Fluctuations in Adverse Pressure Gradients

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Aldrich
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
The Difference

A physics-based approach is employed and a new prediction tool is developed to predict the wavevector-frequency spectrum of the turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations for subsonic airfoils under the influence of adverse pressure gradients. The prediction tool uses an explicit relationship developed by D. M. Chase, which is based on a fit to zero pressure gradient data. The tool takes into account the boundary layer edge velocity distribution and geometry of the airfoil, including the blade chord and thickness. Comparison to experimental adverse pressure gradient data shows a need for an update to the modeling constants of the Chase model. To optimize the correlation between the predicted turbulent boundary layer wall pressure spectrum and the experimental data, an optimization code (iSIGHT) is employed. This optimization module is used to minimize the absolute value of the difference (in dB) between the predicted values and those measured across the analysis frequency range. An optimized set of modeling constants is derived that provides reasonable agreement with the measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document