scholarly journals Diagnostic Serial Interval as an Indicator for Effectiveness of Contact Tracing in the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Simulation Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia K. Mettler ◽  
Jewel Park ◽  
Orhun Özbek ◽  
Linus K. Mettler ◽  
Po-Han Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Study ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Serial Interval

scholarly journals Subcritical Transmission in the Early Stage of COVID-19 in Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1265
Author(s):  
Yong Sul Won ◽  
Jong-Hoon Kim ◽  
Chi Young Ahn ◽  
Hyojung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Incubation Period ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Statistical Characterization ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
Imported Cases ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reporting Delays

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been ongoing in Korea since January 2020, there were limited transmissions during the early stages of the outbreak. In the present study, we aimed to provide a statistical characterization of COVID-19 transmissions that led to this small outbreak. We collated the individual data of the first 28 confirmed cases reported from 20 January to 10 February 2020. We estimated key epidemiological parameters such as reporting delay (i.e., time from symptom onset to confirmation), incubation period, and serial interval by fitting probability distributions to the data based on the maximum likelihood estimation. We also estimated the basic reproduction number (R0) using the renewal equation, which allows for the transmissibility to differ between imported and locally transmitted cases. There were 16 imported and 12 locally transmitted cases, and secondary transmissions per case were higher for the imported cases than the locally transmitted cases (nine vs. three cases). The mean reporting delays were estimated to be 6.76 days (95% CI: 4.53, 9.28) and 2.57 days (95% CI: 1.57, 4.23) for imported and locally transmitted cases, respectively. The mean incubation period was estimated to be 5.53 days (95% CI: 3.98, 8.09) and was shorter than the mean serial interval of 6.45 days (95% CI: 4.32, 9.65). The R0 was estimated to be 0.40 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.99), accounting for the local and imported cases. The fewer secondary cases and shorter reporting delays for the locally transmitted cases suggest that contact tracing of imported cases was effective at reducing further transmissions, which helped to keep R0 below one and the overall transmissions small.

scholarly journals Estimation of incubation period and serial interval of COVID-19: analysis of 178 cases and 131 transmission chains in Hubei province, China

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Yang ◽  
Jingyi Dai ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Yunfu Wang ◽  
Pingji Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incubation Period ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Hubei Province ◽  
Interval Censoring ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Outbreak Period ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
Incubation Periods

Abstract A novel coronavirus disease, designated as COVID-19, has become a pandemic worldwide. This study aims to estimate the incubation period and serial interval of COVID-19. We collected contact tracing data in a municipality in Hubei province during a full outbreak period. The date of infection and infector–infectee pairs were inferred from the history of travel in Wuhan or exposed to confirmed cases. The incubation periods and serial intervals were estimated using parametric accelerated failure time models, accounting for interval censoring of the exposures. Our estimated median incubation period of COVID-19 is 5.4 days (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8–6.0), and the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles are 1 and 15 days, respectively; while the estimated serial interval of COVID-19 falls within the range of −4 to 13 days with 95% confidence and has a median of 4.6 days (95% CI 3.7–5.5). Ninety-five per cent of symptomatic cases showed symptoms by 13.7 days (95% CI 12.5–14.9). The incubation periods and serial intervals were not significantly different between male and female, and among age groups. Our results suggest a considerable proportion of secondary transmission occurred prior to symptom onset. And the current practice of 14-day quarantine period in many regions is reasonable.

scholarly journals Contact Tracing of COVID-19 in Karnataka, India: Superspreading and Determinants of Infectiousness and Symptomaticity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohak Gupta ◽  
Giridara G Parameswaran ◽  
Manraj S Sra ◽  
Rishika Mohanta ◽  
Devarsh Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Symptomatic Infection ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
Index Cases ◽  
Degree Of Heterogeneity

Brief AbstractWe analysed SARS-CoV-2 surveillance and contact tracing data from Karnataka, India up to 21 July 2020. We estimated metrics of infectiousness and the tendency for superspreading (overdispersion), and evaluated potential determinants of infectiousness and symptomaticity in COVID-19 cases. Among 956 cases confirmed to be forward-traced, 8.7% of index cases had 14.4% of contacts but caused 80% of all secondary cases, suggesting significant heterogeneity in individual-level transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 which could not be explained by the degree of heterogeneity in underlying number of contacts. Secondary attack rate was 3.6% among 16715 close contacts. Transmission was higher when index case was aged >18 years, or was symptomatic (adjusted risk ratio, aRR 3.63), or was lab-confirmed ≥4 days after symptom onset (aRR 3.01). Probability of symptomatic infection increased with age, and symptomatic infectors were 8.16 times more likely to generate symptomatic secondaries. This could potentially cause a snowballing effect on infectiousness and clinical severity across transmission generations; further studies are suggested to confirm this. Mean serial interval was 5.4 days. Adding backward contact tracing and targeting control measures to curb super-spreading may be prudent. Due to low symptomaticity and infectivity, interventions aimed at children might have a relatively small impact on reducing transmission.Structured AbstractBackgroundIndia has experienced the second largest outbreak of COVID-19 globally, yet there is a paucity of studies analysing contact tracing data in the region. Such studies can elucidate essential transmission metrics which can help optimize disease control policies.MethodsWe analysed contact tracing data collected under the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme from Karnataka, India between 9 March and 21 July 2020. We estimated metrics of disease transmission including the reproduction number (R), overdispersion (k), secondary attack rate (SAR), and serial interval. R and k were jointly estimated using a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. We evaluated the effect of age and other factors on the risk of transmitting the infection, probability of asymptomatic infection, and mortality due to COVID-19.FindingsUp to 21 July, we found 111 index cases that crossed the super-spreading threshold of ≥8 secondary cases. R and k were most reliably estimated at R 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.91) and k 0.12 (0.11-0.15) for confirmed traced cases (n=956); and R 0.91 (0.72-1.15) and k 0.22 (0.17-0.27) from the three largest clusters (n=394). Among 956 confirmed traced cases, 8.7% of index cases had 14.4% of contacts but caused 80% of all secondary cases. Among 16715 contacts, overall SAR was 3.6% (3.4-3.9) and symptomatic cases were more infectious than asymptomatic cases (SAR 7.7% vs 2.0%; aRR 3.63 [3.04-4.34]). As compared to infectors aged 19-44 years, children were less infectious (aRR 0.21 [0.07-0.66] for 0-5 years and 0.47 [0.32-0.68] for 6-18 years). Infectors who were confirmed ≥4 days after symptom onset were associated with higher infectiousness (aRR 3.01 [2.11-4.31]). Probability of symptomatic infection increased with age, and symptomatic infectors were 8.16 (3.29-20.24) times more likely to generate symptomatic secondaries. Serial interval had a mean of 5.4 (4.4-6.4) days with a Weibull distribution. Overall case fatality rate was 2.5% (2.4-2.7) which increased with age.ConclusionWe found significant heterogeneity in the individual-level transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 which could not be explained by the degree of heterogeneity in the underlying number of contacts. To strengthen contact tracing in over-dispersed outbreaks, testing and tracing delays should be minimised, retrospective contact tracing should be considered, and contact tracing performance metrics should be utilised. Targeted measures to reduce potential superspreading events should be implemented. Interventions aimed at children might have a relatively small impact on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission owing to their low symptomaticity and infectivity. There is some evidence that symptomatic cases produce secondary cases that are more likely to be symptomatic themselves which may potentially cause a snowballing effect on infectiousness and clinical severity across transmission generations; further studies are needed to confirm this finding.FundingGiridhara R Babu is funded by an Intermediate Fellowship by the Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance (Clinical and Public Health Research Fellowship); grant number: IA/CPHI/14/1/501499.

scholarly journals Estimating transmission dynamics and serial interval of the first wave of COVID-19 infections under different control measures: A statistical analysis in Tunisia from February 29 to May 5, 2020

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khouloud Talmoudi ◽  
Mouna Safer ◽  
Hejer Letaief ◽  
Aicha Hchaichi ◽  
Chahida Harizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Diseases ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Transmission Dynamics ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Epidemic Threshold ◽  
Illness Onset ◽  
Intervention Measures ◽  
Temporal Reproduction ◽  
Prevention Measure ◽  
Serial Interval

Abstract Background Describing transmission dynamics of the outbreak and impact of intervention measures are critical to planning responses to future outbreaks and providing timely information to guide policy makers decision. We estimate serial interval (SI) and temporal reproduction number (Rt) of SARS-CoV-2 in Tunisia. Methods We collected data of investigations and contact tracing between March 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020 as well as illness onset data during the period February 29-May 5, 2020 from National Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases of Tunisia. Maximum likelihood (ML) approach is used to estimate dynamics of Rt. Results 491 of infector-infectee pairs were involved, with 14.46% reported pre-symptomatic transmission. SI follows Gamma distribution with mean 5.30 days [95% CI 4.66–5.95] and standard deviation 0.26 [95% CI 0.23–0.30]. Also, we estimated large changes in Rt in response to the combined lockdown interventions. The Rt moves from 3.18 [95% CI 2.73–3.69] to 1.77 [95% CI 1.49–2.08] with curfew prevention measure, and under the epidemic threshold (0.89 [95% CI 0.84–0.94]) by national lockdown measure. Conclusions Overall, our findings highlight contribution of interventions to interrupt transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Tunisia.

scholarly journals On the relationship between serial interval, infectiousness profile and generation time

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (174) ◽  
pp. 20200756
Author(s):  
Sonja Lehtinen ◽  
Peter Ashcroft ◽  
Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Generation Time ◽  
Time Distribution ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Single Individual ◽  
Generation Times ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The timing of transmission plays a key role in the dynamics and controllability of an epidemic. However, observing generation times—the time interval between the infection of an infector and an infectee in a transmission pair—requires data on infection times, which are generally unknown. The timing of symptom onset is more easily observed; generation times are therefore often estimated based on serial intervals—the time interval between symptom onset of an infector and an infectee. This estimation follows one of two approaches: (i) approximating the generation time distribution by the serial interval distribution or (ii) deriving the generation time distribution from the serial interval and incubation period—the time interval between infection and symptom onset in a single individual—distributions. These two approaches make different—and not always explicitly stated—assumptions about the relationship between infectiousness and symptoms, resulting in different generation time distributions with the same mean but unequal variances. Here, we clarify the assumptions that each approach makes and show that neither set of assumptions is plausible for most pathogens. However, the variances of the generation time distribution derived under each assumption can reasonably be considered as upper (approximation with serial interval) and lower (derivation from serial interval) bounds. Thus, we suggest a pragmatic solution is to use both approaches and treat these as edge cases in downstream analysis. We discuss the impact of the variance of the generation time distribution on the controllability of an epidemic through strategies based on contact tracing, and we show that underestimating this variance is likely to overestimate controllability.

scholarly journals Estimating the serial interval of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A statistical analysis using the public data in Hong Kong from January 16 to February 15, 2020

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Zhao ◽  
Daozhou Gao ◽  
Zian Zhuang ◽  
Marc KC Chong ◽  
Yongli Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Distributed Model ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
Public Data ◽  
Interval Censored ◽  
Large Outbreak ◽  
Emerging Virus ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Censored Likelihood

AbstractBackgroundsThe emerging virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused a large outbreak of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China since December 2019. Based on the publicly available surveillance data, we identified 21 transmission chains in Hong Kong and estimated the serial interval (SI) of COVID-19.MethodsIndex cases were identified and reported after symptoms onset, and contact tracing was conducted to collect the data of the associated secondary cases. An interval censored likelihood framework is adopted to fit a Gamma distribution function to govern the SI of COVID-19.FindingsAssuming a Gamma distributed model, we estimated the mean of SI at 4.4 days (95%CI: 2.9−6.7) and SD of SI at 3.0 days (95%CI: 1.8−5.8) by using the information of all 21 transmission chains in Hong Kong.ConclusionThe SI of COVID-19 may be shorter than the preliminary estimates in previous works. Given the likelihood that SI could be shorter than the incubation period, pre-symptomatic transmission may occur, and extra efforts on timely contact tracing and quarantine are recommended in combating the COVID-19 outbreak.

scholarly journals Estimating the generation interval for COVID-19 based on symptom onset data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganyani Tapiwa ◽  
Kremer Cécile ◽  
Chen Dongxuan ◽  
Torneri Andrea ◽  
Faes Christel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incubation Period ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Transmission Network ◽  
Generation Interval ◽  
Period Distribution ◽  
Reproduction Numbers ◽  
Serial Interval ◽  
Modelling Studies ◽  
Interval Distribution

AbstractBackgroundEstimating key infectious disease parameters from the COVID-19 outbreak is quintessential for modelling studies and guiding intervention strategies. Whereas different estimates for the incubation period distribution and the serial interval distribution have been reported, estimates of the generation interval for COVID-19 have not been provided.MethodsWe used outbreak data from clusters in Singapore and Tianjin, China to estimate the generation interval from symptom onset data while acknowledging uncertainty about the incubation period distribution and the underlying transmission network. From those estimates we obtained the proportions pre-symptomatic transmission and reproduction numbers.ResultsThe mean generation interval was 5.20 (95%CI 3.78-6.78) days for Singapore and 3.95 (95%CI 3.01-4.91) days for Tianjin, China when relying on a previously reported incubation period with mean 5.2 and SD 2.8 days. The proportion of pre-symptomatic transmission was 48% (95%CI 32-67%) for Singapore and 62% (95%CI 50-76%) for Tianjin, China. Estimates of the reproduction number based on the generation interval distribution were slightly higher than those based on the serial interval distribution.ConclusionsEstimating generation and serial interval distributions from outbreak data requires careful investigation of the underlying transmission network. Detailed contact tracing information is essential for correctly estimating these quantities.

scholarly journals Estimating transmission dynamics and serial interval of the first wave of COVID-19 infections under different control measures: a statistical analysis in Tunisia from February 29 to May 5, 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khouloud Talmoudi ◽  
Mouna Safer ◽  
Hejer Letaief ◽  
Aicha Hchaichi ◽  
Chahida Harizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Credible Interval ◽  
Emerging Diseases ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Transmission Dynamics ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Epidemic Threshold ◽  
Illness Onset ◽  
Intervention Measures ◽  
Temporal Reproduction ◽  
Serial Interval

Abstract Background Describing transmission dynamics of the outbreak and impact of intervention measures are critical to planning responses to future outbreaks and providing timely information to guide policy makers decision. We estimate serial interval (SI) and temporal reproduction number (Rt) of SARS-CoV-2 in Tunisia. Methods We collected data of investigations and contact tracing between March 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020 as well as illness onset data during the period February 29–May 5, 2020 from National Observatory of New and Emerging Diseases of Tunisia. Maximum likelihood (ML) approach is used to estimate dynamics of Rt. Results Four hundred ninety-one of infector-infectee pairs were involved, with 14.46% reported pre-symptomatic transmission. SI follows Gamma distribution with mean 5.30 days [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.66–5.95] and standard deviation 0.26 [95% CI 0.23–0.30]. Also, we estimated large changes in Rt in response to the combined lockdown interventions. The Rt moves from 3.18 [95% Credible Interval (CrI) 2.73–3.69] to 1.77 [95% CrI 1.49–2.08] with curfew prevention measure, and under the epidemic threshold (0.89 [95% CrI 0.84–0.94]) by national lockdown measure. Conclusions Overall, our findings highlight contribution of interventions to interrupt transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Tunisia.

scholarly journals Quality and adoption of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps, with recommendations for development: A systematic, interdisciplinary review of European national apps (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonie Kahnbach ◽  
Dirk Lehr ◽  
Jessica Brandenburger ◽  
Tim Mallwitz ◽  
Sophie Jent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Health ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Study Results

BACKGROUND Simulation study results suggest that COVID-19 contact-tracing apps have the potential to achieve pandemic control. Concordantly, high app adoption rates were a stipulated prerequisite for success. Early studies on potential adoption were encouraging. Several factors predicting adoption rates were investigated, especially pertaining to user characteristics. Since then, several countries have released COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. OBJECTIVE This study’s primary aim was to investigate the quality characteristics of national European COVID-19 contact-tracing apps, thereby shifting attention from user to application characteristics. Secondly, associations between app quality and adoption were investigated. Finally, app features contributing to higher app quality were identified. METHODS Eligible COVID-19 contact-tracing apps were those released by national health authorities of European Union member states, former member states, and countries of the European Free Trade Association, all countries with comparable legal standards concerning personal data protection and app-usage voluntariness. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was utilized to assess app quality. An interdisciplinary team, consisting of two health and two human-computer-interaction scientists, independently conducted MARS ratings. To investigate associations between app quality and adoptions rates and measures of pandemic control, a Bayesian linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS We discovered 21 national COVID-19 contact-tracing apps, all demonstrating high quality overall, and high-level functionality, aesthetics, and information-quality. However, the average app-adoption rate, of 22.9% (SD 12.5%), was far below the level recommended by simulation studies. Lower levels of engagement-oriented app design were detected, with substantial variations between apps. By regression analyses, the best-case adoption rate (BCAR) was calculated by assuming apps achieve highest ratings. The mean BCARs for engagement and overall app quality were 40% and 44%, respectively. Higher adoption rates were associated with lower cumulative infection rates. Overall, we identified five feature categories (symptom assessment and monitoring, regularly-updated information, individualization, tracing, and communication) and 14 individual features that contributed to higher app quality. These 14 features were: a symptom checker, a symptom diary, statistics on COVID-19, app usage, public health instructions/restrictions, information of burden on healthcare system, assigning personal data, regional updates, control over tracing activity, contact diary, venue check-in, chats, helplines, and app-sharing capacity. CONCLUSIONS European national health authorities have generally released high-quality COVID-19 contact-tracing apps, with regards to functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. However, the app’s engagement-oriented design generally was of lower quality, even though regression analyses results identify engagement as a promising optimization target to increase adoption rates. Associations between higher app-adoption and lower infection rates are consistent with simulation study results, albeit acknowledging that app usage might be part of a broader set of protective attitudes and behaviors for self and others. Various features were identified that could guide further engagement-enhancing app development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document