Transcriptome analysis of stress tolerance in entomopathogenic nematodes of the genus Steinernema

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mor Yaari ◽  
Adi Doron-Faigenboim ◽  
Hinanit Koltai ◽  
Liora Salame ◽  
Itamar Glazer
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Tian ◽  
Zhenyu Wang ◽  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Huacong Ci ◽  
Pengshan Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 29-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Pérez-Díaz ◽  
J. Ricardo Pérez-Díaz ◽  
David B. Medeiros ◽  
Ellen Zuther ◽  
Chwan-Yang Hong ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farida Olden ◽  
Arthur G. Hunt ◽  
Randy Dinkins

Abstract Background Drought tolerance is a crucial trait for crops to curtail the yield loss inflicted by water stress to crops, yet genetic improvement efforts are challenged by the complexity of this character. The adaptation of sorghum to abiotic stress, its genotypic variability, and relatively small genome make this species well-suited to dissect the molecular basis of drought tolerance. One efficient approach to this question is the use of differential transcriptome analysis, which provides a snapshot of the processes underlying drought response as well as genes that might be determinants of the drought tolerance trait. Results RNA sequencing was used to compare the transcriptome profiles of two sorghum lines, the drought-tolerant SC56 and the drought-sensitive Tx7000. The differential expression analysis revealed unambiguous genotypic disparities, including a massive increase of upregulated transcripts in SC56. Concomitantly, gene ontology enrichment showed that SC56 biologically outperformed Tx7000 in wet conditions, since it upregulated processes driving growth and guaranteeing homeostasis. The drought tolerance of SC56 seems to be an intrinsic trait that occurs through the overexpression of stress tolerance genes in wet conditions, notably those acting in defense against oxidative stress (SOD1, SOD2, VTC1, MDAR1, MSRB2, and ABC1K1). Under drought conditions, SC56 enhanced its transmembrane transport and maintained growth-promoting mechanisms similar to those implemented under wet conditions. SC56 also appears to preserve its biological function, in a limiting environment, by relying on reported validated stress tolerance genes that heighten the antioxidant capacity (SOD1, RCI3, VTE1, UCP1, FD1, and FD2), regulatory factors (CIPK1 and CRK7), and repressors of premature senescence (SAUL1). Of the stress tolerance genes overexpressed under both wet and drought conditions, DHAR2 might be a key determinant of drought tolerance since its role in recycling ascorbic acid was described to be directly linked to protection against reactive oxygen species-mediated damage, positive effects on photosynthetic activity, higher rate of plant growth, and delayed leaf aging. Conclusion The differential expression analysis uncovered biological processes which upregulation enables SC56 to be a better accumulator of biomass and connects the drought tolerance trait to key stress tolerance genes, making this genotype a judicious choice for isolation of tolerance genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document