scholarly journals Lung Cancer and Heart Disease Risks Associated with Low-Dose Pulmonary Radiotherapy to COVID-19 Patients with Different Background Risks

Author(s):  
Igor Shuryak ◽  
Lisa A. Kachnic ◽  
David J. Brenner
Lung Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Zanon ◽  
Gabriel Sartori Pacini ◽  
Vinicius Valério Silveiro de Souza ◽  
Edson Marchiori ◽  
Gustavo Souza Portes Meirelles ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ghaznavi H ◽  

Using low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to treat inflammation, pneumonia, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been investigated. Results have revealed that LDRT can improve inflammation in different line cells, animals, and humans. It was demonstrated that LDRT with a single dose (0.3-1 Gy) to the lungs could treat pneumonia resulting from COVID-19 by avoiding normal tissue toxicities. These suggested values of doses are obtained from the historical use of ionizing radiation for pneumonia [1]. A clinical study recently treated five patients with COVID-19 in the age range of 64-96 years; the lungs of these patients were exposed to 1.5 Gy of radiation in one fraction. Results showed that their respiratory conditions were quickly improved in four patients in the first 24 hours of exposure. The results of blood tests and imaging also confirmed the positive effect of LDRT on COVID-19 treatment [2]. Short course results of another study carried out on five patients with COVID-19 aged over 60 years, who underwent national COVID-19 therapy protocols, showed that using 0.5 Gy of radiation in one fraction led to the improvement of four patients in the first few days after exposure. Apart from that, they were discharged from the hospital with an average of 6 days, and no radiation toxicity was observed in them [3]. Another clinical investigation has used LDRT on nine patients to treat COVID-19. In this study, patients received 1 Gy to total lungs, and the SatO2/FiO2 index of these patients was evaluated. Results showed that this index significantly improved 72 hours and one week after LDRT, and inflammation of the lungs decreased one week after radiation therapy. Compared to patients who did not receive LDRT, the median days of hospitalization of patients who received LDRT was reduced by approximately one-fifth. Among these patients, seven were discharged, and two patients died [4]. The incidence of cancers such as lung, esophagus, and breast is one of the controversial subjects surrounding the use of LDRT in COVID-19 treatment. According to the Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation VII (BEIR VII) model, the risk of lung cancer was estimated for patients with COVID-19 whose lungs were irradiated to 0.5 Gy. The incidence of lung cancer can increase by 0.84% and 2.3% for males and females aged above 60 years, respectively. On the other hand, for young patients aged 25 years, the incidence of lung cancer was estimated at 1.1% and 3% for males and females, respectively [5]. According to this model, with an increase in the dose received by the lungs, the risk of lung cancer increases linearly; therefore, the incidence of lung cancer for patients whose whole lung receives a dose of 1.5 Gy will be three times for those who have received a dose of 0.5 Gy [6]. Based on these results, exposure of the lungs to the dose in the range 0.5-1.5 Gy can increase the risk of lung cancer up to 9% and 7% for female patients and 3.3% and 2.5% for male patients aged 25 and 65, respectively. Of course, it should be noted that smoking should be considered in estimating the risk of lung cancer in addition to the radiation factor. Besides the lungs, the heart and esophagus may also be exposed to radiation, increasing the risk of esophageal cancer and heart disease. Nevertheless, blood factors, smoking, and a history of heart disease can be influential in the incidence of heart disease in addition to radiation [7,8]. Results of these clinical trials have shown that the recommended dose (0.5-1.5 Gy) can increase lung cancer up to 9%. As one of the possible effects of ionizing radiation is carcinogenicity, no threshold has been defined for its occurrence, but another issue in radiobiology is the risk-benefit of ionizing radiation. As no radiation toxicities were reported in the said clinical studies, it seems that LDRT is safe; however, more clinical studies are needed to prove this claim. We should not hastily recommend the use of LDRT as an adjuvant treatment for COVID-19. To make a definite comment and evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of LDRT to treat COVID-19, we need more clinical studies with many patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 510-520
Author(s):  
박세정 ◽  
Byounggoo Ko ◽  
김양례 ◽  
정은지 ◽  
JungTaek Shin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
pp. 12-19
Author(s):  
Thi Ngoc Ha Hoang ◽  
Trong Khoan Le

Background: A pulmonary nodule is defined as a rounded or irregular opacity, well or poorly defined, measuring up to 3 cm in diameter. Early detection the malignancy of nodules has a significant role in decreasing the mortality, increasing the survival time and consider as early diagnosis lung cancer. The main risk factors are those of current or former smokers, aged 55 to 74 years with a smoking history of at least 1 pack-day. Low dose CT: screening individuals with high risk of lung cancer by low dose CT scans could reduce lung cancer mortality by 20 percent compared to chest X-ray. Radiation dose has to maximum reduced but respect the rule of ALARA (As Low as Resonably Archivable). LungRADS 2014: Classification of American College of Radiology, LungRADS, is a newly application but showed many advantages in comparison with others classification such as increasing positive predict value (PPV), no result of false negative and cost effectiveness. Key words: LungRADS, screening lung nodule, low dose CT, lung cancer


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-233
Author(s):  
Sergey Morozov ◽  
Viktor Gombolevskiy ◽  
Anton Vladzimirskiy ◽  
Albina Laypan ◽  
Pavel Kononets ◽  
...  

Study aim. To justify selective lung cancer screening via low-dose computed tomography and evaluate its effectiveness. Materials and methods. In 2017 we have concluded the baseline stage of “Lowdose computed tomography in Moscow for lung cancer screening (LDCT-MLCS)” trial. The trial included 10 outpatient clinics with 64-detector CT units (Toshiba Aquilion 64 and Toshiba CLX). Special low-dose protocols have been developed for each unit with maximum effective dose of 1 mSv (in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 2.2.1, Sanitary Regulations 2.6.1.1192-03). The study involved 5,310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18-92 years (mean age 62 years). Diagnosis verification was carried out in the specialized medical organizations via consultations, additional instrumental, laboratory as well as pathohistological studies. The results were then entered into the “National Cancer Registry”. Results. 5310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18 to 92 years (an average of 62 years) participated in the LDCT-MLCS. The final cohort was comprised of 4762 (89.6%) patients. We have detected 291 (6.1%) Lung-RADS 3 lesions, 228 (4.8%) Lung- RADS 4A lesions and 196 (4.1%) Lung-RADS 4B/4X lesions. All 4B and 4X lesions were routed in accordance with the project's methodology and legislative documents. Malignant neoplasms were verified in 84 cases (1.76% of the cohort). Stage I-II lung cancer was actively detected in 40.3% of these individuals. For the first time in the Russian Federation we have calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one lung cancer (NNS=57) and to detect one Stage I lung cancer (NNS=207). Conclusions. Based on the global experience and our own practices, we argue that selective LDCT is the most systematic solution to the problem of early-stage lung cancer screening.


Author(s):  
Geetika Kaur ◽  
B. V. Sunil Kumar ◽  
Baljit Singh ◽  
R. S. Sethi

Abstract Background Pesticide residues in food and environment along with airborne contaminants such as endotoxins pose health risk. Although herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) has been associated with increased risk of lung cancers such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) among agricultural workers, there are no data on the SCLC signaling pathway upon 2,4-D exposure without LPS or in combination with endotoxin. Methods We exposed Swiss albino mice (N = 48) orally to high (9.58 mg kg− 1) and low (5.12 mg kg− 1) dosages of 2,4-D dissolved in corn oil for 90 days followed by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or normal saline solution (80 μl/animal). Lung samples and broncho-alveolar fluid (BALF) were subjected to Total histological score (THS) and total leucocyte count (TLC) and differential leucocytes count (DLC) analyses, respectively. We used microarray and bioinformatics tools for transcriptomic analyses and differentially expressed genes were analyzed to predict the top canonical pathways followed by validation of selected genes by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Results Total histological score (THS) along with BALF analyses showed lung inflammation following long term dietary exposure to high or low doses of 2,4-D individually or in combination with LPS. Microarray analysis revealed exposure to high dose of 2,4-D without or with LPS upregulated 2178 and 2142 and downregulated 1965 and 1719 genes, respectively (p < 0.05; minimum cut off 1.5 log fold change). The low dose without or with LPS upregulated 2133 and 2054 and downregulated 1838 and 1625 genes, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis showed SCLC as topmost dysregulated pathway along with differential expression of Itgb1, NF-κB1, p53, Cdk6 and Apaf1. Immunohistological and quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses also supported the transcriptomic data. Conclusions Taken together, the data show exposures to high and low dose of 2,4-D with/without LPS induced lung inflammation and altered pulmonary transcriptome profile with the involvement of the SCLC pathway. The data from the study provide the insights of the potential damage on lungs caused by 2,4-D and help to better understand the mechanism of this complex relation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document