Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder among Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Forms of Dementia

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
M. Selim Asmer ◽  
Julia Kirkham ◽  
Hailey T. Newton ◽  
Zahinoor Ismail ◽  
Roxanne Leung ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 297-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Qing-E Zhang ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Chee H. Ng ◽  
Gabor S. Ungvari ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruihan WANG ◽  
Jinghao DUAN ◽  
Quan ZHENG ◽  
Xueping CHEN

Abstract Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are often co-existing in the elderly and have been suggested to share common pathological and physiological links. Understanding the connections between these two diseases could benefit for revealing new possible strategies of early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Methods: we conducted a meta-analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MDD microarray datasets including 180 MDD and 281 control prefrontal cortex of brain samples. Using identified DEGs, we performed gene ontology (GO), pathway and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis. Results: We identified 1400 DEGs, of which 846 were upregulated and 554 was downregulated in MDD. 198 DEGs were found over-lapping between AD and MDD compared with the previous study on AD. The over-lapping DEGs were particularly enriched in the protein binding of gene ontology and Signal Transduction, Immune System, Metabolism of proteins as for pathways. CDC42 was the most important gene in PPI network which had the most connections with other genes.Conclusion: Our study shows that MDD and AD share significant common DEGs and pathways and add some new potential perspectives to the comprehensive neurobiologic model between MDD and the development of AD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Juul ◽  
Faiza Siddiqui ◽  
Marija Barbateskovic ◽  
Caroline Kamp Jørgensen ◽  
Michael Pascal Hengartner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder is one of the most common, burdensome, and costly psychiatric disorders worldwide. Antidepressants are frequently used to treat major depressive disorder. It has been shown repeatedly that antidepressants seem to reduce depressive symptoms with a statistically significant effect, but the clinical importance of the effect sizes seems questionable. Both beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants have not previously been sufficiently assessed. The main objective of this review will be to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, ‘active placebo’, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. Methods/design A systematic review with meta-analysis will be reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2 (ROB2), our eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, Trial Sequential Analysis will be conducted to control for random errors, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. To identify relevant trials, we will search both for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases from their inception to the present. Clinical study reports will be obtained from regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Two review authors will independently screen the results of the literature searches, extract data, and perform risk of bias assessment. We will include any published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing one or more antidepressants with placebo, ‘active placebo’, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The following active agents will be included: agomelatine, amineptine, amitriptyline, bupropion, butriptyline, cianopramine, citalopram, clomipramine, dapoxetine, demexiptiline, desipramine, desvenlafaxine, dibenzepin, dosulepin, dothiepin, doxepin, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, iprindole, levomilnacipran, lofepramine, maprotiline, melitracen, metapramine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, nortriptyline, noxiptiline, opipramol, paroxetine, protriptyline, quinupramine, reboxetine, sertraline, trazodone, tianeptine, trimipramine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine. Primary outcomes will be depressive symptoms, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be suicide or suicide attempt, suicidal ideation, and non-serious adverse events. Discussion As antidepressants are commonly used to treat major depressive disorder in adults, a systematic review evaluating their beneficial and harmful effects is urgently needed. This review will inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of this highly prevalent and burdensome disorder. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220279


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document