Frailty as a Predictor of Surgical Outcomes in Older Patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 210 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Makary ◽  
Dorry L. Segev ◽  
Peter J. Pronovost ◽  
Dora Syin ◽  
Karen Bandeen-Roche ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
R. Dekker ◽  
D. Souwer ◽  
A. Berzina ◽  
S. Luelmo ◽  
S. Mieog ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasumi Maze ◽  
Toshiya Tokui ◽  
Masahiko Murakami ◽  
Bun Nakamura ◽  
Ryosai Inoue ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Surgical indication and the selection of surgical procedures for acute type A aortic dissection in older patients are controversial; therefore, we examined the surgical outcomes in older patients.Methods: From January 2012 through December 2019, 174 patients surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection. We compared the surgical outcomes between the older (≥80 years old) and below-80 (≤79 years old) age groups. Additionally, we compared the surgical and conservative treatment groups.Results: The primary entry was found in the ascending aorta in 51.6% and 32.8% of the older and below-80 groups, respectively (p = 0.049). Ascending or hemiarch replacement was performed in all older group cases and 57.3% of the below-80 group cases (total arch replacement was performed in the remaining 42.7%; p < 0.001). Hospital mortality rates were similar in both groups. The significant risk factors for hospital mortality were age, preoperative intubation, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and postoperative stroke. The 5-year survival rates were 48.4% ± 10.3% (older group) and 86.7% ± 2.9% (below-80 group; p < 0.001). The rates of freedom from aortic events at 5 years were 86.9% ± 8.7% (older group) and 86.5% ± 3.9% (below-80 group; p = 0.771). The 5-year survival rate of the conservative treatment group was 19.2% ± 8.0% in the older group. There was no significant difference between the surgical treatment groups (p = 0.103).Conclusion: The surgical approach did not achieve a significant survival advantage over conservative treatment and may not always be the reasonable treatment of choice for older patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-1009
Author(s):  
Kevin K. Roggin ◽  
Joshua A. Hemmerich ◽  
Jeffrey B. Matthews ◽  
Mitchell C. Posner ◽  
William Dale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
anthony lemaire ◽  
Cassandra Soto ◽  
Lauren Salgueiro ◽  
Hirohisa Ikegami ◽  
Mark J. Russo ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective : As the population ages, increasing number of older patients are undergoing adult cardiac surgery. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of age on postoperative outcomes in patients that undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods : Patients that are ≥70 years old who underwent CABG were selected from the Nationwide/National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2015 using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. The patients who were 70–79 years old were compared to patients aged 80–89 years old to determine if the age difference of the patients had an impact on surgical outcomes. In addition, the gender of the patients 80-89 years old were compared to determine the influence of patient gender on surgical outcomes. The rates of postoperative complications, mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and cost were compared using the Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression analysis, and Wilcoxon rank sum test.Results : A total of 67,568 patients were identified who were ≥70 years old and underwent CABG. Compared to the Septuagenarians, the Octogenarians were more likely to develop cardiac complications (OR [odds ratio] =1.20, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.12-1.23. They were also more likely to develop renal complications (OR 1.54 95% CI 1.48-1.61, P <0001), respiratory complications (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-2.1, P <0001), and infectious complications (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.48, P <0001). The Octogenarians were also more likely to bleed postoperatively (P <0.0001) and have a higher mortality (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.36-1.61, P <0001). Moreover, the older patients had a longer postoperative LOS (median 9 days IQR [interquartile range] 7-13 days compared to the Septuagenarians (median 8 days IQR 6-11 days). The Octogenarians had an associated increased hospital cost (median $39,152 IQR $30, 0003.84 - $53,272.84) compared to the Septuagenarians (median $35,996.16 IQR $27,735.94 - $48,134.38). Furthermore, the female Octogenarians had a higher mortality (OR 1.25 95% CI 1.07–1.46) compared to males in the same age group.Conclusions : Advanced age influences surgical outcomes after CABG. The patients who were ≥80 – 89 years old had worse postoperative outcomes with increased complications and higher mortality compared to the Septuagenarians. Additionally, the Octogenarians who were females had a higher mortality compared to their male counterparts. These findings should help determine treatment options for older patients who need adult cardiac surgery.


JAMA Surgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 151 (9) ◽  
pp. e161701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Suskind ◽  
Emily Finlayson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document