Risk Assessment in Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Complicated Appendicitis: Serum Albumin More Predictive than other Indices

2014 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
Doris Wagner ◽  
Georg Werkgartner ◽  
Johann Pfeiffer ◽  
Regina Elisabeth Roller ◽  
Mathias Wagner ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Pascual ◽  
Ruth Prieto

Classifying CPs within the overly vague, uninformative category “suprasellar” prevents gaining any true insight regarding the risks associated with the surgical procedure employed. Routine MRI obtained with conventional T1- and T2-weighted sequences along the midsagittal and coronal trans-infundibular planes allow an accurate and reliable preoperative definition of CP topography. CPs developing primarily within the infundibulum and/or tuberal region of the hypothalamus, as well as those wholly located within the 3V, should be distinguished preoperatively from those lesions originally expanding beneath the 3V floor (3VF), the true suprasellar tumors. Among adult patients, about 40% of CPs correspond to infundibulo-tuberal tumors expanding primarily within the 3VF, above an intact pituitary gland and stalk. This subgroup of CPs shows strong adherences to the surrounding hypothalamus, as they are embedded within a wide band of reactive gliotic tissue, usually infiltrated by microscopic finger-like solid cords of tumor tissue. In elderly patients, a significant proportion of CPs correspond to papillary tumors developing above an intact 3VF, usually showing small pedicle-like or sessile-like attachments to the infundibulum. With the current diagnostic MRI workup routinely employed for CPs, it is possible, for the majority of lesions, to preoperatively differentiate these topographical variants and predict the type of CP-hypothalamus relationship that will be found during surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 195-203
Author(s):  
Mohamad El Moheb ◽  
Zhenyi Jia ◽  
Huanlong Qin ◽  
Majed W. El Hechi ◽  
Ask T. Nordestgaard ◽  
...  

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O A Javed ◽  
M J Khan ◽  
Y Abbas ◽  
S Pillai ◽  
K Hristova ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Elderly patients with femoral fractures are often frail and require a multidisciplinary approach to optimise medical care, rehabilitation and prevention of further injury. Previously, neck of femur fracture patients were the focus of such an approach, but NICE and BOAST guidelines emphasise extending this care to other elderly trauma patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 43 patients over 60 years old at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2019 with a femoral fracture other than a neck of femur fracture. BOAST guideline standards were surgery within 36 hours, orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours, a documented ceiling of treatment, falls risk assessment, bone health review, nutritional assessment and physiotherapy review. Results Our study showed worse outcomes in all standards for patients with femoral shaft, distal femur and periprosthetic femur fractures compared to neck of femur fractures: surgery within 36 hours (63.9% vs. 66%); orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours (32.6% vs. 91.9%); falls risk assessment (76.7% vs. 99.6%); bone health review (41.9% vs. 99.7%); nutritional assessment (55.8% vs. 99.6%); physiotherapy review (97.7% vs. 98.9%). The group also had worse outcomes for average length of stay (19 days vs. 14 days) and 30 day mortality (9.3% vs. 8.6%). Discussion Our study showed a discrepancy in care received by elderly patients with femoral fractures other than neck of femur. We will introduce a proforma for all femoral fractures, present our findings to orthogeriatric, bone health and physiotherapy teams to involve them in the care of such patients and re-audit following these recommendations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.M. Anthony ◽  
T. Reynolds ◽  
J. Paton ◽  
L. Rafter

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-248
Author(s):  
Albert Ariza-Solé ◽  
Francesc Formiga ◽  
Eva Bernal ◽  
Alberto Garay

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celaleddin Soyalp ◽  
Nureddin Yuzkat ◽  
Mehmet Kilic ◽  
Mehmet Edip Akyol ◽  
Canser Yilmaz Demir ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 4060-4069
Author(s):  
Anne C. M. Cuijpers ◽  
Marielle M. E. Coolsen ◽  
Ronny M. Schnabel ◽  
Susanne van Santen ◽  
Steven W. M. Olde Damink ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postoperative outcome prediction in elderly is based on preoperative physical status but its predictive value is uncertain. The goal was to evaluate the value of risk assessment performed perioperatively in predicting outcome in case of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A total of 108 postsurgical patients were retrospectively selected from a prospectively recorded database of 144 elderly septic patients (>70 years) admitted to the ICU department after elective or emergency abdominal surgery between 2012 and 2017. Perioperative risk assessment scores including Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality (P-POSSUM) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA) were determined. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV) was obtained at ICU admission. Results In-hospital mortality was 48.9% in elderly requiring ICU admission after elective surgery (n = 45), compared to 49.2% after emergency surgery (n = 63). APACHE IV significantly predicted in-hospital mortality after complicated elective surgery [area under the curve 0.935 (p < 0.001)] where outpatient ASA physical status and P-POSSUM did not. In contrast, P-POSSUM and APACHE IV significantly predicted in-hospital mortality when based on current physical state in elderly requiring emergency surgery (AUC 0.769 (p = 0.002) and 0.736 (p = 0.006), respectively). Conclusions Perioperative risk assessment reflecting premorbid physical status of elderly loses its value when complications occur requiring unplanned ICU admission. Risks in elderly should be re-assessed based on current clinical condition prior to ICU admission, because outcome prediction is more reliable then.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 630-637
Author(s):  
Nobuhide Kubo ◽  
Hirohumi Kawanaka ◽  
Shoji Hiroshige ◽  
Hirotada Tajiri ◽  
Akinori Egashira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document