scholarly journals Interleukin-6 receptor blocking with intravenous tocilizumab in COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective case-control survival analysis of 128 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 102511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo M. Canziani ◽  
Serena Trovati ◽  
Enrico Brunetta ◽  
Amidio Testa ◽  
Maria De Santis ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyvan Razazi ◽  
Romain ARRESTIER ◽  
Anne-Fleur Haudebourg ◽  
Brice Benelli ◽  
Guillaume Carteaux ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The goal of this study was to assess risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods. We conducted a monocenter retrospective study comparing the prevalence of VAP and invasive aspergillosis between patients with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) and those with non-SARS-CoV-2 viral ARDS (NC-ARDS).Results. We assessed 90 C-ARDS and 82 NC-ARDS patients, who were mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours. At ICU admission, there were significantly fewer bacterial coinfections documented in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS: 14 (16%) vs 38 (48%), p<0.01. Conversely, significantly more patients developed at least one VAP episode in C-ARDS as compared with NC-ARDS : 58 (64%) vs. 36 (44%), p=0.007. The probability of VAP was significantly higher in C-ARDS after adjusting on death and ventilator weaning [sub-hazard ratio = 1.72 (1.14-2.52), p<0.01].The prevalence of multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR) related VAP was significantly higher in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS: 21 (23%) vs. 9 (11%), p=0.03. Carbapenem was more used in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS: 48 (53%), vs 21 (26%), p<0.01. According to AspICU algorithm, there were fewer cases of putative aspergillosis in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS [2 (2%) vs. 12 (15%), p=0.003], but there was no difference in Aspergillus colonization.Conclusions. In this retrospective case-control study, we evidenced a higher prevalence of VAP and MDR-VAP in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS, and a lower risk for invasive aspergillosis in the former group.


Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Daniel T. Cater ◽  
Aimee R. Ealy ◽  
Erin Kramer ◽  
Samer Abu-Sultaneh ◽  
Courtney M. Rowan

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly have dependent atelectasis and heterogeneous lung disease. Due to the heterogenous lung volumes seen, the application of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) can have both beneficial and deleterious effects. Alternating supine and prone positioning may be beneficial in ARDS by providing more homogenous distribution of PEEP and decreasing intrapulmonary shunt. In pediatrics, the pediatric acute lung injury and consensus conference (PALICC) recommended to consider it in severe pediatric ARDS (PARDS). Manually prone positioning patients can be burdensome in larger patients. In adults, the use of rotational beds has eased care of these patients. There is little published data about rotational bed therapy in children. Therefore, we sought to describe the use of a rotational bed in children with PARDS. We performed a retrospective case series of children who utilized a rotational bed as an adjunctive therapy for their PARDS. Patient data were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed and reported. Oxygenation indices (OI) pre- and post-prone positioning were analyzed. Twelve patients with PARDS were treated with a rotational bed with minimal adverse events. There were no complications noted. Three patients had malfunctioning of their arterial line while on the rotational bed. Oxygenation indices improved over time in 11 of the 12 patients included in the study while on the rotational bed. Rotational beds can be safely utilized in pediatric patients. In larger children with PARDS, where it may be more difficult to perform a manual prone position, use of a rotational bed can be considered a safe alternative.


2013 ◽  
Vol 305 (7) ◽  
pp. L467-L477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Sun ◽  
Shwu-Fan Ma ◽  
Michael S. Wade ◽  
Marialbert Acosta-Herrera ◽  
Jesús Villar ◽  
...  

The genetic mechanisms underlying the susceptibility to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are poorly understood. We previously demonstrated that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and the S1P receptor S1PR3 are intimately involved in lung inflammatory responses and vascular barrier regulation. Furthermore, plasma S1PR3 protein levels were shown to serve as a biomarker of severity in critically ill ARDS patients. This study explores the contribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the S1PR3 gene to sepsis-associated ARDS. S1PR3 SNPs were identified by sequencing the entire gene and tagging SNPs selected for case-control association analysis in African- and ED samples from Chicago, with independent replication in a European case-control study of Spanish individuals. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays, luciferase activity assays, and protein immunoassays were utilized to assess the functionality of associated SNPs. A total of 80 variants, including 29 novel SNPs, were identified. Because of limited sample size, conclusive findings could not be drawn in African-descent ARDS subjects; however, significant associations were found for two promoter SNPs (rs7022797 −1899T/G; rs11137480 −1785G/C), across two ED samples supporting the association of alleles −1899G and −1785C with decreased risk for sepsis-associated ARDS. In addition, these alleles significantly reduced transcription factor binding to the S1PR3 promoter; reduced S1PR3 promoter activity, a response particularly striking after TNF-α challenge; and were associated with lower plasma S1PR3 protein levels in ARDS patients. These highly functional studies support S1PR3 as a novel ARDS candidate gene and a potential target for individualized therapy.


Biomeditsina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 60-70
Author(s):  
V. N. Karkischenko ◽  
I. A. Pomytkin ◽  
N. V. Petrova ◽  
S. V. Maksimenko ◽  
M. M. Skripkina ◽  
...  

This study aims to investigate effects of tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptors, on cytokine expression and animal survival in a model of fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) characterized by high mortality rates and increased IL-6 production in the lungs. The expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interferons α (IFN-α) and β (IFN-β) in the lungs was assessed by real-time PCR. Cytokine production was assessed by enzyme immunoassay. Although tocilizumab did not affect the expression of the studied cytokines in the lungs of animals with ARDS, it changed the profiles of their release. An acute multifold increase in the levels of IL-6 in the lungs was observed in the first two hours after the administration of tocilizumab, followed by a decrease of IL-6 to lower values similar to those observed in intact animals. Tocilizumab did not reduce mortality in treated animals with ARDS compared to those without treatment. Thus, the inhibition of the IL-6 receptor signaling pathway alone does not provide an effective solution to the problem of reducing mortality from ARDS associated with the development of a “cytokine storm”.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Alessandra Petrillo ◽  
Noa Biran ◽  
Sean Sadikot

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a disorder that involves the activation of alveolar macrophages triggering the innate immune system. The parenchymal lung injury seen in ARDS is a result of many proinflammatory elevations including interleukin-6. There remains no effective standard of care of ARDS, and current treatments at this time currently do not target the immunological mechanisms or pathways involved. Treatments involving this pathway should be further investigated as targeted treatment. We discuss a case of a patient with multiple myeloma who was hospitalized with drug-induced ARDS who had a rapid response to an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document