scholarly journals An elliptic theory of indicial weights and applications to non-linear geometry problems

2018 ◽  
Vol 274 (6) ◽  
pp. 1587-1610
Author(s):  
Yuanqi Wang
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1529-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Godefroy ◽  
G. Lancien ◽  
V. Zizler

Author(s):  
Svein Erling Heggelund ◽  
Zhiyuan Li ◽  
Beom-Seon Jang ◽  
Jonas W. Ringsberg

Design against impact loads (slamming) can be challenging and time consuming and can involve complex calculations. Application of simplified, quasi-static calculation approaches will make the design process much easier. In this paper, such simplified methods are discussed using free fall lifeboats as a case. Results from non-linear FE-analysis show that the response is non-linear due to large deformations. The impact pressure is then mainly carried by membrane stress and the dynamic response is small. A non-linear beam theory approach for hand calculation is established. As the non-linear calculation model is the most realistic, it is recommended that this is used in an initial design assessment. Although the results are on the conservative side, simple hand calculations including non-linear geometry can be used to predict the maximum strain. Linear methods are also investigated. However, these methods should be used with more rigid structures such as stiffened steel and aluminium panels.


2013 ◽  
Vol 376 ◽  
pp. 331-335
Author(s):  
Sunil Shukla ◽  
H. S. Deshmukh ◽  
Patil Vinaay ◽  
B.A. Thite A.

Robot Gun structure is an efficient way in which multiple welds can be done simultaneously. However mounting several weld guns on a single structure induces a variety of dynamic loads, especially during movement of the robot arm as it maneuvers to reach the weld locations.The primary idea employed in this paper, is to model those dynamic loads as equivalent G force loads in FEA. This approach will be on the conservative side, and will be saving time and subsequently cost efficient. The approach of the paper is towards creating a standard operating procedure (SOP) when it comes to analysis of such structures, with emphasis on deploying various technical aspects of FEA such as Non Linear Geometry, Multipoint Constraint Contact Algorithm, Multizone meshing .


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Berghout

Beniamino Segre, in his memorial lecture of 1958 [5], [6], inaugurated the study of non-linear geometry in three dimensions over a division ring. In his treatment of sections of quadrics by planes, he is naturally led to consider conics and the problem of tangency. Now in the commutative case the locus of intersection of a quadric and a plane containing a generator is the line-pair consisting of this generator and one from the other family. Such a plane is then the tangent plane of the point of intersection of the two generators. Segre extends this notion to the non-commutative case, where the locus of intersection is not always a line-pair. He joins up the remaining points of intersection in pairs, and calls the points where the lines so formed cut the base generator, the ‘points of contact’ of the plane (π) and the quadric (Q). A line in π is called a ‘tangent’ if it passes through a point of contact, but does not contain any of the points of intersection of Q and π.


1967 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 105-176
Author(s):  
Robert F. Christy

(Ed. note: The custom in these Symposia has been to have a summary-introductory presentation which lasts about 1 to 1.5 hours, during which discussion from the floor is minor and usually directed at technical clarification. The remainder of the session is then devoted to discussion of the whole subject, oriented around the summary-introduction. The preceding session, I-A, at Nice, followed this pattern. Christy suggested that we might experiment in his presentation with a much more informal approach, allowing considerable discussion of the points raised in the summary-introduction during its presentation, with perhaps the entire morning spent in this way, reserving the afternoon session for discussion only. At Varenna, in the Fourth Symposium, several of the summaryintroductory papers presented from the astronomical viewpoint had been so full of concepts unfamiliar to a number of the aerodynamicists-physicists present, that a major part of the following discussion session had been devoted to simply clarifying concepts and then repeating a considerable amount of what had been summarized. So, always looking for alternatives which help to increase the understanding between the different disciplines by introducing clarification of concept as expeditiously as possible, we tried Christy's suggestion. Thus you will find the pattern of the following different from that in session I-A. I am much indebted to Christy for extensive collaboration in editing the resulting combined presentation and discussion. As always, however, I have taken upon myself the responsibility for the final editing, and so all shortcomings are on my head.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document