scholarly journals Performance of disk diffusion and broth microdilution for fosfomycin susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 391-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Fernanda Mojica ◽  
Elsa De La Cadena ◽  
Cristhian Hernández-Gómez ◽  
Adriana Correa ◽  
Tobias Manuel Appel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution

scholarly journals In VitroActivity of Fosfomycin against a Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from 16 Spanish Hospitals: Establishing the Validity of Standard Broth Microdilution as Susceptibility Testing Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 5701-5703 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Díez-Aguilar ◽  
María-Isabel Morosini ◽  
Rosa del Campo ◽  
María García-Castillo ◽  
Javier Zamora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution

ABSTRACTThe broth microdilution method for fosfomycin andPseudomonas aeruginosawas assessed and compared with the approved agar dilution method in 206 genetically unrelatedP. aeruginosaclinical isolates. Essential agreement between the two methods was 84%, and categorical agreement was 89.3%. Additionally, Etest and disk diffusion assays were performed. Results validate broth microdilution as a reliable susceptibility testing method for fosfomycin againstP. aeruginosa. Conversely, unacceptable concordance was established between Etest and disk diffusion results with agar dilution results.

scholarly journals Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison of Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01649-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paul Morris ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Tsigedera Tekle ◽  
John A. Fissel ◽  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Alternative Approach

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of cefiderocol poses challenges because of its unique mechanism of action (i.e., requiring an iron-depleted state) and due to differences in interpretative criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Our objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for AST of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol AST was performed on consecutive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; 58 isolates) and non-glucose-fermenting GNB (50 isolates) by BMD (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and DD (30 μg; research-use-only [RUO] MASTDISCS and FDA-cleared HardyDisks). Results were interpreted using FDA (prior to 28 September 2020 update), EUCAST, and investigational CLSI breakpoints (BPs). Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were calculated for DD methods. The susceptibilities of all isolates by BMD were 72% (FDA), 75% (EUCAST) and 90% (CLSI). For DD methods, EUCAST BPs demonstrated lower susceptibility at 65% and 66%, compared to 74% and 72% (FDA) and 87% and 89% (CLSI) by HardyDisks and MASTDISCS, respectively. CA ranged from 75% to 90%, with 8 to 25% mE, 0 to 19% ME, and 0 to 20% VME and varied based on disk, GNB, and BPs evaluated. Both DD methods performed poorly for Acinetobacter baumannii complex. There is considerable variability when cefiderocol ASTs are interpreted using CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints. DD offers a convenient alternative approach to BMD methods for cefiderocol AST, with the exception of A. baumannii complex isolates.

scholarly journals Comparison of Agar Diffusion Methodologies for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1818-1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane L. Burns ◽  
Lisa Saiman ◽  
Susan Whittier ◽  
Davise Larone ◽  
Jay Krzewinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Agar Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen infecting the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Improved antimicrobial chemotherapy has significantly increased the life expectancy of these patients. However, accurate susceptibility testing of P. aeruginosa isolates from CF sputum may be difficult because the organisms are often mucoid and slow growing. This study of 597 CF isolates of P. aeruginosa examined the correlation of disk diffusion and Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) results with a reference broth microdilution method. The rates of interpretive errors for 12 commonly used antipseudomonal antimicrobials were determined. The disk diffusion method correlated well (zone diameter versus MIC) for all of the agents tested. However, for mucoid isolates, correlation coefficients (r values) for piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem were <0.80. The Etest correlation with reference broth microdilution results (MIC versus MIC) was acceptable for all of the agents tested, for both mucoid and nonmucoid isolates. Category interpretation errors were similar for the disk diffusion and Etest methods with 0.4 and 0.1%, respectively, very major errors (false susceptibility) and 1.1 and 2.2% major errors (false resistance). Overall, both agar diffusion methods appear to be broadly acceptable for routine clinical use in susceptibility testing of CF isolates of P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals 710. In Vitro Activity and Performance of Available Susceptibility Testing Methods for Eravacycline Against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S319-S320
Author(s):  
Chelsea E Jones ◽  
Ellen G Kline ◽  
Minh-Hong Nguyen ◽  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Ryan K Shields
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Susceptibility Breakpoint

Abstract Background Eravacycline (ERV) is a recently-approved, fully synthetic fluorocycline agent that demonstrates broad in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens. We sought to compare the activity of ERV with minocycline (MIN) and tigecycline (TGC) against diverse CRE clinical isolates, and to evaluate the performance of commercially-available susceptibility testing methods. Methods ERV, MIN, and TGC minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in triplicate by broth microdilution against previously characterized CRE isolates. ERV susceptibility was also measured by disk diffusion (20 µg disk; Mast Group) and MIC test strips (MTS; Liofilchem) according to manufacturer instructions. Results 148 CRE were tested, including 92 K. pneumoniae, 32 Enterobacter spp, 11 E. coli, 5 C. freundii, 4 K. oxytoca, and 4 S. marcescens. 72% of isolates harbored blaKPC, which encoded KPC-2 (n = 33), KPC-3 (n = 48), and other KPC variants (n = 22). 77% and 19% of isolates were resistant to meropenem and ceftazidime–avibactam, respectively. By BMD, the ERV, MIN, and TGC MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 for shown in the Table. ERV MICs were ≥2-fold lower than MIN and TGC against 99% and 43% of isolates, respectively. ERV MICs did not vary by species or KPC-subtype. ERV MICs determined by BMD and MTS were well-correlated showing 89% essential agreement (MIC within one 2-fold dilution; Figure). The rate of categorical agreement (CA) was 73%. By comparison, the CA rate between BMD and disk diffusion was 78%. By both MTS and disk diffusion methods, susceptibility results clustered on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. 50% of disk diffusion zones clustered between 14 and 16 millimeters (mm), which is 1 mm on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint (≥15 mm). Conclusion This study confirms the in vitro activity of ERV against CRE clinical isolates, which is comparable to TGC. ERV MTS demonstrated high rates of EA, but lower rates of CA. Clinicians should be aware of the nuances of ERV susceptibility testing and recognize that the modal distribution of ERV MICs against CRE lies on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals In VitroActivity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Obtained from Patients in Canadian Hospitals in the CANWARD Study, 2007 to 2012

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 5707-5709 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Walkty ◽  
J. A. Karlowsky ◽  
H. Adam ◽  
M. Baxter ◽  
P. Lagacé-Wiens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fixed Concentration

ABSTRACTThein vitroactivity of ceftolozane in combination with tazobactam (fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml) was evaluated against 2,435Pseudomonas aeruginosaclinical isolates obtained from across Canada using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. The MIC50and MIC90values for ceftolozane-tazobactam were 0.5 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml, respectively (a 32-fold-lower MIC90than that for ceftazidime). Eighty-nine percent (141/158) of multidrug-resistant isolates were inhibited by ≤8 μg/ml of ceftolozane-tazobactam.

scholarly journals Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Smith ◽  
Hunter V. Brigman ◽  
Jadyn C. Anderson ◽  
Christopher L. Emery ◽  
Tiffany E. Bias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Agar Dilution

ABSTRACT Fosfomycin has been shown to have a wide spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; however, breakpoints have been established only for Escherichia coli or Enterobacterales per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), respectively. A lack of additional organism breakpoints limits clinical use of this agent and has prompted extrapolation of these interpretive categories to other organisms like Pseudomonas aeruginosa without supporting evidence. Further complicating the utility of fosfomycin is the specified method for MIC determination, namely, agar dilution, which is not widely available and is both labor and time intensive. We therefore sought to determine the susceptibility of a large international collection of P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 198) to fosfomycin and to compare testing agreement rates across four methods: agar dilution, broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest. Results were interpreted according to CLSI E. coli breakpoints, with 49.0 to 85.8% considered susceptible, dependent upon the testing method used. Epidemiological cutoff values were calculated and determined to be 256 μg/ml and 512 μg/ml for agar dilution and broth microdilution, respectively. Agreement rates were analyzed using both agar dilution and broth microdilution with a resulting high essential agreement rate of 91.3% between the two susceptibility testing methods. These results indicate that broth microdilution may be a reliable method for fosfomycin susceptibility testing against P. aeruginosa and stress the need for P. aeruginosa-specific breakpoints.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of broth microdilution with E-test, Vitek 2, and disk diffusion for susceptibility testing of colistin on Gram-negative bacteria

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Parul Gupta ◽  
Rajni Sharma ◽  
Aruna Vyas ◽  
Amit Tak
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Geometric Means ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Vitek 2 ◽  
Good Concordance

Objectives: With the increasing threat of multidrug-resistant organisms, colistin has become popular in clinical practice. A better understanding of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for colistin is needed for optimal patient management. The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of E-test, Vitek 2 system for the detection of colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against broth microdilution (BMD). Material and Methods: A total of 100 isolates of Gram-negative bacilli were subjected to susceptibility testing for colistin using the following methods: BMD, E-test, Vitek 2, and disk diffusion. Using BMD as the gold standard, comparative analysis between different methods was carried out. Results: Comparison of MIC values of E-test (GM = 0.488 mg/ml) against BMD (GM = 0.611 mg/ml using unpaired t-test (t = 2.015, P = 0.045) showed that geometric means of MIC values of E-strip were significantly lower than BMD. Similarly, comparison of MIC values of Vitek 2 system (GM = 0.615 mg/ml) against BMD (GM = 0.611 mg/ml) using unpaired t-test (t = −0.050, P = 0.960) showed no statistical significant differences in geometric means of MIC values. Taking reference as BMD method – the EA for E-strip is 57%, CA is 97%, VME is 2%, and no ME. Similarly, for the Vitek method EA is 64%, CA is 98%, VME is 1%, and ME is 1%. Conclusion: Different susceptibility testing methods for colistin show great variation in their results and BMD is the best candidate as gold standard. The Vitek 2 method showed good concordance with BMD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document