Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in Brazil

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S35-S36
Author(s):  
L.L. Luz ◽  
D.B. Ferreira ◽  
I.E. Mattos ◽  
J.F.S. da Silva ◽  
L.M. Santiago ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3689-3689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Danielle C. Marshall ◽  
Molly D. Greenberg ◽  
Tania J. Curcio ◽  
Ashley E. Giambrone ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Age and cytogenetics are the strongest predictors of overall survival (OS) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but practitioners recognize that outcomes are also affected by medical comorbidities, physical function and a variety of psychosocial factors. Recent data suggest that geriatric assessment, including measures of physical, cognitive and psychological function, may be predictive of OS and helpful for risk stratification in AML (Klepin 2013). We evaluated the ability of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to predict overall survival in newly diagnosed older patients with AML. Patients and Methods All newly diagnosed AML patients age ≥60 years treated at Weill Cornell Medical Center and The New York Presbyterian Hospital completed a CGA including the OARS Physical Health Section, Mental Health Inventory (MHI-17), MOS Social Activity Survey, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale of the MOS Physical Health, OARS Instrumental ADL subscale, Timed Up & Go, Blessed-Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Laboratory data, medications, transfusions and days of hospitalization were also collected. Comorbidities were assessed using the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare survival profiles. The independent effects of the CGA and clinical risk factor variables on OS were estimated using hazard ratios in an adjusted Cox regression model. Results In total, 126 patients were evaluated (median age 74, range 60-90). Fifty-one percent of patients had a HCT-CI score >1, with the most common comorbidities being a history of cancer (28.57%), cardiac disease (20.6%), and psychiatric disturbances (17.5%). Half of the patients had prior hematologic disorders and 29% had poor-risk cytogenetics. Most patients (84.9%) received decitabine-based induction strategies; 44 of these patients (34.9%) subsequently received intensive salvage regimens (median age 69). The other 19 patients (15.1%) were treated with standard induction chemotherapy, and 29 patients (21%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (median age 68). One hundred twenty-three patients (96.6%) completed the CGA with a mean time to completion of 26 minutes (± 8.9 minutes). Thirty-five percent of patients did not complete the entire assessment and only 61.1% completed the follow up CGA. Median OS was 11.1 months (range 0.36-52.64), with 1-year survival of 47.6%, complete remission (CR) rate of 39.8%, and 30-day mortality of 2.4%. In univariate analysis, age (P=0.0289), physician-assigned KPS (P=0.0031), sex (P=0.0074), ELN cytogenetic risk (P=0.0194), creatinine (P=0.027), albumin (P=0.0052), white blood cell (WBC) count (P=0.0135), LDH (P=0.0004), and treatment response (P=0.0001) were significant clinical predictors of OS. Significant CGA variables included Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration score (P=0.0035), Bend-Kneel-Stoop (P=0.0239), “someone to prepare your meals” (P=0.0253) and self-reporting of heart disease (P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis controlling for age and cytogenetic risk, physician-assigned KPS (HR, 1.804; 95% CI 1.175 to 2.768), self-reported cardiac history (HR, 2.290; 95% CI 1.383 to 3.794), and WBC count <11.2/ul (HR, 2.360; 95% CI 1.415 to 3.936) were the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion In this study, age and cytogenetics remain the strongest predictors of OS in older patients with AML. While completion of the CGA was feasible, only performance status (KPS) was predictive of OS. Many measures previously reported as significant predictors of outcome, including impaired physical function (Klepin 2013), medication intake (Hurria 2011), pain (Sherman 2013), and HCT-CI score (Sorror 2005, 2009) were not predictive in our study population. The role of the CGA as a predictor of OS in AML requires further evaluation. The utility of the CGA in predicting functional performance and/or quality of life for older AML patients throughout treatment should also be investigated. Disclosures Ritchie: Celgene, Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Feldman:Ariad: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Author(s):  
Merle Weßel

AbstractDespite being a collection of holistic assessment tools, the comprehensive geriatric assessment primarily focuses on the social category of age during the assessment and disregards for example gender. This article critically reviews the standardized testing process of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in regard to diversity-sensitivity. I show that the focus on age as social category during the assessment process might potentially hinder positive outcomes for people with diverse backgrounds of older patients in relation to other social categories, such as race, gender or socio-economic background and their influence on the health of the patient as well as the assessment and its outcomes. I suggest that the feminist perspective of intersectionality with its multicategorical approach can enhance the diversity-sensitivity of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, and thus improve the treatment of older patients and their quality of life. By suggesting an intersectional-based approach, this article contributes to debates about justice and diversity in medical philosophy and advocates for the normative value of diversity in geriatric medicine.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5493-5493
Author(s):  
Yuan Yao ◽  
Dehui Zou ◽  
Aijun Liao ◽  
Xiaoxia Chu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  

Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a disease of the elderly, whose prognoses are highly heterogeneous. Hence International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed geriatric assessment (GA) in 2015, including daily activity and comorbidity status, to better discriminate between fit and frail patients (Palumbo et al, 2015). However, IMWG recruited patients from clinical trials instead of real world practices. Therefore we studied GA in elderly MM patients consecutively in China, along with other perspectives which are known to be problematic in elderly population that were previously left unnoticed, such as nutrition status, risk of cognitive impairment, risk of depression, and quality of life. Aim: Our study centers on the feasibility to perform a more comprehensive geriatric assessment (cGA) in elderly MM patients, current cGA status in elderly MM patients in China, and the cGA difference between Chinese patients and patients in the IMWG study. Method: From August 2017 to April 2019, we continuously recruited 336 newly diagnosed elderly (age ≥ 65) MM patients from 21 centers in China. cGA was performed at diagnosis, after treatment cycle 1, after cycle 4, and 1 year after treatment. cGA includes physical conditions (ECOG), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF), geriatric depression scale (GDS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), quality of life (SF-36) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Staging was assessed at baseline (International Staging System (ISS) & Revised ISS) and hematological responses were evaluated along with each cGA timepoint. Results: We pool-analyzed data of 336 newly-diagnosed elderly MM patients. The median age was 70 (range 65-88) and 25.5% of patients were older than 75 years. 336 (100%) patients were able to complete cGA, and median assessment time was 40 minutes (range 20-70). Upon diagnosis, only 34% and 37.5% of patients had full ADL and IADL respectively. 38.5% of patients had moderate to high risk of depression (GDS ≥ 6). 13.2% of patients were malnourished (MNA-SF ≤ 7), while 46.3% of patients were at risk of malnutrition (8 ≤ MNA-SF ≤ 11). 41% of patients had at least one comorbidity (CCI ≥ 1). 45.7% of patients had moderate to intermediate risk of cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 26). Grouping by IMWG-GA index, our study identified 59.9% patients in frail group (vs 39% in IMWG study), 15.8% in intermediate (vs 31% in IMWG) and 24.3% in fit (vs 30% in IMWG). 69% of patients received proteasome inhibitor-containing regimens and 20.7% of patients received lenalidomide-containing regimens. Best hematological responses in fit and intermediate groups were better than responses in frail group (≥ PR rate: 88.5% in fit, 94.4% in intermediate vs 77.5% in frail). Median follow up time was 10 months. To date, 215 (64%) patients have finished the cGA after cycle 1; 164 (48.8%) patients have finished the cGA after cycle 4; 91 (27.1%) patients has finished all 4 planned cGA and improvements in cGA were observed in the majority of these patients. Conclusion: Our study showed significant CGA heterogeneity in elderly MM patients. Even in the IMWG-GA "fit" group, nutrition, depression and cognitive impairment remain problems. Frail patients took up a larger proportion in Chinese elderly MM patients compared to IMWG study. Our study strongly justifies the necessity for cGA in elderly patients with MM, more so in the real world MM patients than in the clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Tina Hsu ◽  
Nienke A. de Glas ◽  
Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti ◽  
...  

Aging is a heterogeneous process. Most newly diagnosed cancers occur in older adults, and it is important to understand a patient’s underlying health status when making treatment decisions. A geriatric assessment provides a detailed evaluation of medical, psychosocial, and functional problems in older patients with cancer. Specifically, it can identify areas of vulnerability, predict survival and toxicity, assist in clinical treatment decisions, and guide interventions in routine oncology practice; however, the uptake is hampered by limitations in both time and resources, as well as by a lack of expert interpretation. In this review, we describe the utility of geriatric assessment by using an illustrative case and provide a practical approach to geriatric assessment in oncology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document