Airborne hydrogen peroxide for disinfection of the hospital environment and infection control: a systematic review

2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Falagas ◽  
P.C. Thomaidis ◽  
I.K. Kotsantis ◽  
K. Sgouros ◽  
G. Samonis ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Dancer ◽  
Marco-Felipe King

Abstract Background More evidence is emerging on the role of surface decontamination for reducing hospital-acquired infection (HAI). Timely and adequate removal of environmental pathogens leads to measurable clinical benefit in both routine and outbreak situations. Objectives This systematic review aimed to evaluate published studies describing the effect of automated technologies delivering hydrogen peroxide (H202) or ultra-violet (UV) light on HAI rates. Methods A systematic review was performed using relevant search terms. Databases were scanned from January 2005 to March 2020 for studies reporting clinical outcome after use of automated devices on healthcare surfaces. Information collected included device type, overall findings; hospital and ward data; study location, length and size; antimicrobial consumption; domestic monitoring; and infection control interventions. Study sponsorship and duplicate publications were also noted. Results While there are clear benefits from non-touch devices in vitro, we found insufficient objective assessment of patient outcome due to the before-and-after nature of 36 of 43 (84%) studies. Of 43 studies, 20 (47%) used hydrogen peroxide (14 for outbreaks) and 23 (53%) used UV technology (none for outbreaks). The most popular pathogen targeted, either alone or in combination with others, was Clostridium difficile (27 of 43 studies: 63%), followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (16 of 43: 37%). Many owed funding and/or personnel to industry sponsorship (28 of 43: 65%) and most were confounded by concurrent infection control, antimicrobial stewardship and/or cleaning audit initiatives. Few contained data on device costs and rarely on comparable costs (1 of 43: 2%). There were expected relationships between the country hosting the study and location of device companies. None mentioned the potential for environmental damage, including effects on microbial survivors. Conclusion There were mixed results for patient benefit from this review of automated devices using H202 or UV for surface decontamination. Most non-outbreak studies lacked an appropriate control group and were potentially compromised by industry sponsorship. Concern over HAI encourages delivery of powerful disinfectants for eliminating pathogens without appreciating toxicity or cost benefit. Routine use of these devices requires justification from standardized and controlled studies to understand how best to manage contaminated healthcare environments.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110325
Author(s):  
Maria Sagkrioti ◽  
Stephen Glass ◽  
Georgios Arealis

Background Cutibacterium acnes ( C. acnes) is the most common pathogen responsible for post-operative shoulder infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of skin preparation methods against C. acnes in shoulder surgery. Methods A systematic review was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of skin preparation methods in the reduction of C. acnes in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Outcomes were assessed based on the effectiveness of the method used; side effects and cost were also analysed. Results Of the 19 included studies, 9 evaluated pre-surgical home treatments: 8 assessed benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 6 concluded it is effective in reducing C. acnes. Nine studies assessed surgical skin preparation and concluded that Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was not effective; in contrast hydrogen peroxide reduced C. acnes. Finally, one study evaluated an aseptic protocol using CHG and concluded that it was not effective. Conclusions It was demonstrated that BPO as home treatment is effective in reducing C. acnes load on skin ; it rarely causes side effects and is also cost-effective. This study highlights non-effectiveness of CHG. There was some evidence that the addition of hydrogen peroxide could have a positive effect in the reduction of C. acnes skin load; however, more studies are required.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 74551-74568
Author(s):  
Davi Borges De Carvalho ◽  
Beatriz Chaveiro Do Carmo ◽  
Carolina Ducarmo Jordão ◽  
Gustavo Felipe Assunção ◽  
Luiz Gabriel Pereira De Souza ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajat Garg ◽  
Shradha Gupta ◽  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Marian T. Simonson ◽  
Tarun Rustagi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz ◽  
Juliano Cavagni ◽  
Gerson Pedro José Langa ◽  
Bernal Stewart ◽  
Zilson Malheiros ◽  
...  

Background. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been used for more than a century clinically to control plaque and gingival inflammation, with unclear supporting evidence. Aim. The aim of the present systematic review of the literature is to assess the effect of mouth rinses with H2O2 on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and oral microorganisms. Methods. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched with the following focused question: what is the effect of hydrogen peroxide, in comparison to chlorhexidine or to a placebo solution, in oral microbiota control, dental plaque, and gingival inflammatory outcomes? Two independent examiners retrieved the articles and evaluated the evidence. Results. The majority of included studies were performed with 1.5% H2O2. Results related to plaque accumulation generally demonstrate a slightly better effect of H2O2 as compared to placebo mouth rinses, however with a lower performance as compared to chlorhexidine. In terms of gingival inflammation, H2O2 performs better than placebo and more clearly demonstrates an anti-inflammation effect. No studies evaluated the effect of H2O2 against viruses or fungi. In terms of bacteria, H2O2 demonstrates an antibacterial effect. Conclusion. Rinsing with H2O2 has the potential to affect plaque, gingivitis, and oral bacteria, as compared to placebo. However, the antibacterial results are not comparable to the performance of chlorhexidine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1506-1515
Author(s):  
Sahar Hammoud ◽  
Faten Amer ◽  
Szimonetta Lohner ◽  
Béla Kocsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fattorini ◽  
C Quercioli ◽  
G Messina ◽  
N Nante

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) frequently involved in skin, soft tissue and bone infections. Moreover, it is one of the most frequently isolated pathogen in bloodstream infections in European countries. Because of its capacity to survive on inanimate surfaces, this microorganism could be detected not only on hospital environment, but also in other healthcare settings such as ambulances. We performed a systematic review in order to study the level of MRSA contamination in ambulances (vehicle surfaces and medical equipment). Methods In March 2019 we searched studies in PubMed using the key search terms “MRSA, ambulance”. We included different designs of studies in English. Results The research yielded 18 publications: after title, abstract and full text’s analysis, 9 manuscripts were included in this review. Studies were conducted from 2007 to 2018 in USA, Egypt, Poland, Germany and South Korea. Overall, the number of ambulances sampled for MRSA was 511 (min. 3-max. 150), and 64 (12.5%) resulted contaminated by MRSA. Sampling points examined for each vehicle varied from 5 to 33, for a total of 5872 (min. 39-max. 2136) samplings performed. The amount of MRSA positive samplings was 145/5872 (2.5%) (min. 1-max. 43). Stretcher resulted the most frequently contaminated fomite (29 of the 145 MRSA positive samplings, 20%). Conclusions Despite MRSA prevalence is decreasing in Europe, recent studies showed how this MDRO could still be responsible of a remarkable burden in terms of attributable deaths and costs. Implementing effective sanitation procedures with a continuative monitoring of the processes is highly recommended in all the healthcare settings, including ambulances. Automated terminal disinfection of these vehicles, adopting technologies such as ultraviolet germicidal irradiation or hydrogen peroxide aerosol, could reduce bacterial contamination hosted on surfaces and medical equipment. Key messages Although the percentage of isolates of MRSA in European countries is decreasing, the burden this multidrug resistant organism in terms of mortality and costs remains remarkable. Ambulances must be considered as a potential reservoir of MRSA because of its ability to survive on inanimate surfaces, and adequate sanitation procedures should be frequently performed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document