Modulation of Conditioned Fear, Fear-Conditioned Analgesia, and Brain Regional C-Fos Expression Following Administration of Muscimol into the Rat Basolateral Amygdala

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 712-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Rea ◽  
Michelle Roche ◽  
David P. Finn
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Olango ◽  
S. M. Geranton ◽  
O. Moriarty ◽  
M. Roche ◽  
S. P. Hunt ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín Cammarota ◽  
Daniela M. Barros ◽  
Mónica R.M. Vianna ◽  
Lia R.M. Bevilaqua ◽  
Adriana Coitinho ◽  
...  

Memory is measured by measuring retrieval. Retrieval is often triggered by the conditioned stimulus (CS); however, as known since Pavlov, presentation of the CS alone generates extinction. One-trial avoidance (IA) is a much used conditioned fear paradigm in which the CS is the safe part of a training apparatus, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is a footshock and the conditioned response is to stay in the safe area. In IA, retrieval is measured without the US, as latency to step-down from the safe area (i.e., a platform). Extinction is installed at the moment of the first unreinforced test session, as clearly shown by the fact that many drugs, including PKA, ERK and protein synthesis inhibitors as well as NMDA receptor antagonists, hinder extinction when infused into the hippocampus or the basolateral amygdala at the moment of the first test session but not later. Some, but not all the molecular systems required for extinction are also activated by retrieval, further endorsing the hypothesis that although retrieval is behaviorally and biochemically necessary for the generation of extinction, this last process constitutes a new learning secondary to the unreinforced expression of the original trace.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 759-770
Author(s):  
Rachel-Karson Thériault ◽  
Joshua D Manduca ◽  
Colin R Blight ◽  
Jibran Y Khokhar ◽  
Tariq A Akhtar ◽  
...  

Background: Mitragynine is the major alkaloid of Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) with potential as a therapeutic in pain management and in depression. There has been debate over the potential side effects of the drug including addiction risk and cognitive decline. Aims: To evaluate the effects of mitragynine on neurophysiological systems function in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), cingulate cortex (Cg), orbitofrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens (NAc), hippocampus (HIP), thalamus (THAL), basolateral amygdala (BLA) and ventral tegmental area of rats. Methods: Local field potential recordings were taken from animals at baseline and for 45 min following mitragynine administration (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Drug-induced changes in spectral power and coherence between regions at specific frequencies were evaluated. Mitragynine-induced changes in c-fos expression were also analyzed. Results: Mitragynine increased delta power and reduced theta power in all three cortical regions that were accompanied by increased c-fos expression. A transient suppression of gamma power in PFC and Cg was also evident. There were no effects of mitragynine on spectral power in any of the other regions. Mitragynine induced a widespread reduction in theta coherence (7–9 Hz) that involved disruptions in cortical and NAc connectivity with the BLA, HIP and THAL. Conclusions: These findings show that mitragynine induces frequency-specific changes in cortical neural oscillatory activity that could potentially impact cognitive functioning. However, the absence of drug effects within regions of the mesolimbic pathway may suggest either a lack of addiction potential, or an underlying mechanism of addiction that is distinct from other opioid analgesic agents.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon O Tasan ◽  
Dilip Verma ◽  
Herbert Herzog ◽  
Günther Sperk

2021 ◽  
Vol 396 ◽  
pp. 112913
Author(s):  
Olena Bukalo ◽  
Mio Nonaka ◽  
Chase A. Weinholtz ◽  
Adriana Mendez ◽  
William W. Taylor ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica C. Gaspar ◽  
Bright N. Okine ◽  
Alvaro Llorente-Berzal ◽  
Michelle Roche ◽  
David P. Finn

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors with three isoforms (PPARα, PPARβ/δ, PPARγ) and can regulate pain, anxiety, and cognition. However, their role in conditioned fear and pain-fear interactions has not yet been investigated. Here, we investigated the effects of systemically administered PPAR antagonists on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour, fear-conditioned analgesia (FCA), and conditioned fear in the presence of nociceptive tone in rats. Twenty-three and a half hours following fear conditioning to context, male Sprague-Dawley rats received an intraplantar injection of formalin and intraperitoneal administration of vehicle, PPARα (GW6471), PPARβ/δ (GSK0660) or PPARγ (GW9662) antagonists, and 30 min later were re-exposed to the conditioning arena for 15 min. The PPAR antagonists did not alter nociceptive behaviour or fear-conditioned analgesia. The PPARα and PPARβ/δ antagonists prolonged context-induced freezing in the presence of nociceptive tone without affecting its initial expression. The PPARγ antagonist potentiated freezing over the entire trial. In conclusion, pharmacological blockade of PPARα and PPARβ/δ in the presence of formalin-evoked nociceptive tone, impaired short-term, within-trial fear-extinction in rats without affecting pain response, while blockade of PPARγ potentiated conditioned fear responding. These results suggest that endogenous signalling through these three PPAR isoforms may reduce the expression of conditioned fear in the presence of nociceptive tone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document