scholarly journals An integrated cell culture reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (ICC-RTqPCR) method to simultaneously quantify the infectious concentrations of eight environmentally relevant enterovirus serotypes

2021 ◽  
pp. 114225
Author(s):  
Odile Larivé ◽  
Jade Brandani ◽  
Manupriyam Dubey ◽  
Tamar Kohn
2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1282-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidong Kong ◽  
Cindy H. Nakatsu

ABSTRACT Seven different bacterial strains and primer sets and a mixed community were used to evaluate the use of reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) and Q-PCR of oxygenase genes to assess various approaches for monitoring the bioremediation of polluted sites. Differences in maximum activity were seen when different RNA extraction kits were compared.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2339-2339
Author(s):  
David M. Ross ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Susan Branford

Abstract Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for BCR-ABL (RQ-PCR) is used to monitor treatment response in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). BCR-ABL levels continue to decline over several years of imatinib treatment and increasing numbers of patients have BCR-ABL levels at or below the limit of detection. The sensitivity of current RQ-PCR assays limits our ability to identify patients who have a continuing decline in BCR-ABL levels; or to assess the effects of novel therapies to improve outcome in patients who have a good response to ABL kinase inhibitors, but harbour minimal residual disease. Improvements in therapy for these patients will be hard to assess without more sensitive monitoring of BCR-ABL. BCR-ABL levels are usually reported relative to a control gene. The control gene value gives an indication of the sensitivity achieved within each RNA sample; this varies with sample quality and efficiency of reverse transcription (RT). Control gene copy number below a defined value indicates that the analysis may be unreliable. We investigated the use of a random pentadecamer (RP; 15mer) primer in the RT reaction to improve the sensitivity of RQ-PCR. The RP primer is reported to be more efficient than the random hexamer (RH; 6mer) which is commonly used for RQ-PCR. BCR-ABL and BCR control gene transcripts were measured in 30 peripheral blood samples. After Trizol extraction 2μg RNA and 400U Superscript II reverse transcriptase were added to two RT reactions using RP or RH at a final concentration of 25μM. Each RT and quantitative PCR was performed 2–3 times and results compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test or paired t-test. A more efficient RT is indicated by higher transcript levels. The table shows that BCR-ABL and BCR control gene values were significantly higher with RP primers. There was a proportionate increase in all transcripts so that the change in BCR-ABL/BCR% was not significant. BCR-ABL and control gene values with pentadecamer or hexamer primers No. of Samples Primer Median 25th Percentile 75th Percentile P value (RP v HP) * missing values due to inclusion of samples with undetectable BCR-ABL BCR transcripts 30 RH 438900 241800 1090000 < 0.001 RP 1203700 836500 2125000 BCR-ABL transcripts 16* RH 280 110 11340 < 0.001 RP 390 220 32910 BCR-ABL/BCR ratio 16* RH 0.10% 0.06% 5.6% =0.083 RP 0.08% 0.05% 4.2% We tested samples with undetectable BCR-ABL including 10 from CML patients on imatinib, and 10 from BCR-ABL negative control subjects. Each RNA was tested in two independent RTs and Q-PCRs. If the results were discordant a third RQ-PCR was performed and a consensus result determined. Using RP primers 6/10 patient samples were positive; 2/10 were positive with RH. None of the BCR-ABL negative control samples was positive with either primer. Sensitivity was calculated using the lower limit of detection and the standardised baseline value for untreated CML patients.The median calculated sensitivity increased from 4.5-log with RH to 5.0-log with RP. The use of pentadecamer primer made possible the detection of BCR-ABL in a small number of patients who had undetectable BCR-ABL with random hexamer RQ-PCR. This initial analysis suggests that the sensitivity of BCR-ABL detection may be improved 2–3-fold with a simple modification to RT methodology. This also has the potential to reduce the number of samples deemed unsatisfactory due to low control gene levels.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 3495-3499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre B. de Menezes ◽  
James E. McDonald ◽  
Heather E. Allison ◽  
Alan J. McCarthy

ABSTRACTThe relative abundance of micromonosporas in the bacterial communities inhabiting cellulose baits, water columns, and sediments of two freshwater lakes was determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) of reverse-transcribed 16S rRNA.Micromonosporaspp. were shown to be significant members of the active bacterial population colonizing cellulosic substrates in the lake sediment, and their increased prevalence with greater depth was confirmed by enumeration of CFU.


2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 2064-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
DORIS SOBRAL MARQUES SOUZA ◽  
TAKAYUKI MIURA ◽  
CÉCILE LE MENNEC ◽  
CÉLIA REGINA MONTE BARARDI ◽  
FRANÇOISE S. LE GUYADER

To evaluate the persistence of infectious virus after heating, mussels contaminated with a rotavirus strain were prepared following the French recipe moules marinières (mariner's mussels). Rotavirus was then quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and a cell culture infectivity assay. Results showed the persistence of infectious virus after 3 min of cooking. After 5 min, when no infectious virus could be detected, the RT-qPCR approach showed a 1-log decrease compared with concentrations detected after 1 min of cooking.


FACETS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 959-965
Author(s):  
Yannan Huang ◽  
Lindsay Johnston ◽  
Ana Parra ◽  
Crystal Sweeney ◽  
Emalie Hayes ◽  
...  

Wastewater-based surveillance methods have been implemented in several countries as a tool for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 at a community scale. A variety of methods have been used for concentrating, extracting, and detecting the virus, with no clear consensus on the most effective approach. In this note, we report preliminary findings from a study that is tracking SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater in Halifax, Nova Scotia, with a specific focus on the use of four reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays for detecting the virus in wastewater. We were able to detect the virus in wastewater samples during the initial rise of cases in the Halifax region in early November 2020. Levels of the targeted SARS-CoV-2 gene fragments increased and fell in response to reported cases of COVID-19. The CDC N1 and E RT-qPCR assays demonstrated greater relative sensitivity than the CDC N2 and N3 assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw sewage samples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document