The influence of maintenance therapy of rituximab on the survival of elderly patients with follicular lymphoma. A retrospective analysis from the database of the Czech Lymphoma Study Group

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Belada ◽  
Vit Prochazka ◽  
Andrea Janikova ◽  
Vit Campr ◽  
Petra Blahovcova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Frontline Intensive Chemotherapy Brings Survival Benefit In Young, Risky Patients With Follicular Lymphoma: Pair-Matched Analysis From The Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) Database

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4354-4354
Author(s):  
Vit Prochazka ◽  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Andrea Janikova ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Tomas Kozak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Additional Risk ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group ◽  
Risky Patients ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a disease with very heterogeneous course ranging from the indolent forms to rapidly progressive cases with poor outcome. Optimal therapy in FL patients with high tumor burden is immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP is the most frequent regimen used), followed by maintenance treatment. Data from randomized prospective studies (PRIMA) showed poorer outcome in those with high risk disease in terms of lower CR rate, higher risk of relapse and lower efficacy of maintenance therapy. Data comparing up-front intensive approach in younger fit patients and R-CHOP are limited. Aim To analyze long term results of intensive treatment protocol (R-sequential chemotherapy) in comparison with age, FLIPI and maintenance delivery matched (R-CHOP) controls. Methods Here we analyzed data of 48 prospectively enrolled FL patients who were treated by sequential (R-SQ) chemotherapy with or without up-front autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as a part of stratified risk adapted treatment in one institution. For R-SQ regimen were indicated patients<65 years with INT-FLIPI (with at least 2 additional risk factors: bulk and/or elevated B2M>3mg/L and/or thymidine kinase>15 IU/L) or HIGH-FLIPI patients (irrespective of additional risk factors). R-SQ protocol consists of alternating three cycles of etoposide-doxorubicine regimen (PACEBO), one methotrexate-ifosfamide regimen (IVAM), and one cycle of high dose cytarabine regimen (HAM). Remission was consolidated with 6th cycle of chemotherapy (PACEBO) in INT-FLIPI patients (n=22, 46%) or with ASCT with BEAM-200 conditioning (n=26, 54%) in HIGH-FLIPI patients. Maintenance immunotherapy was applied for historical reasons in 24 patients (50%). Controls were randomly selected from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) database from 626 cases with confirmed FL grade I to IIIa, treated with R-CHOP. Pair matching was performed on 1:3 basis, controls were matched by age, FLIPI and rituximab maintenance application. In the end, we analyzed intensive SQ-group (n=44) and standard control R-CHOP-group (n=144). Maintenance therapy was delivered to 24 patients (50%) in R-SQ group and to 72 patients (50%) in R-CHOP-group (P=1.00). Results Median age of SQ-group was 47.6 years compared to 48.7 years in R-CHOP (P=0.44), FLIPI index was equally distributed: INT-FLIPI (43% vs 43%), HIGH-FLIPI (57% vs 57%, P=1.00). Treatment response quality was higher in SQ-group than in R-CHOP-group: CR/CRu 93.8% vs 70%, PR 6.2% vs 23% and SD/PD 0% vs 8% respectively (P=0.01). During the follow-up, (median 3.5 and 6.1 years in R-CHOP and SQ-group respectively, P<0.01) 10 patients (20.8%) relapsed or progressed in the R-SQ-group, and 41 (29%) in the R-CHOP-group (P=0.01). Only two of 48 patients (4.2%) died in the R-SQ-group, whereas twelve (8.7%) died in the R-CHOP-group (P=0.03). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was superior in the R-SQ-group with 78.5% (95% CI 0.66-0.91) survival compared to 53.8% (95% CI 0.43-0.65, P=0.005, HR=0.37) in the R-CHOP-group. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 100% in the R-SQ-group and 91.9% (95% CI 0.86-0.97, P=0.027, HR=0.18) in the R-CHOP group. When analyzing patients who received maintenance therapy, we found no difference in OS (P=0.13), but there was still significant difference in 5-year PFS in favor of the R-SQ-arm (88.4% and 58.2%, P=0.034). Conclusions In risky FL patients, intensive front-line therapy brings about 24% advantage in CR rate, about 25% higher 5-year PFS (reduces risk of relapse/progression by 62%) and about 10% advantage in 5-year OS (reduces risk of death by 82%). Maintenance immunotherapy application overshadows OS but not PFS advantage of intensive chemotherapy. Finally, in younger physically fit risky patients, more intensive induction regimen leads to superior disease control a remission duration compared to standard R-CHOP. Acknowledgment Supported by grants: LF-2013-004, IGA NT12193-5/2011 and PRVOUK-27/LF1/1. We would like to thank to all referring physicians: Jan Pirnos (Ceske Budejovice), Katerina Kubackova (FN Motol), Lucie Barsova (Liberec), Petr Kessler (Pelhrimov), Jitka Jakesova (Pribram), Milan Lysy (Usti n. Labem), Jindra Ciberova (Znojmo), Dagmar Adamova (Opava), Milan Matuska (Ostrava), Martin Brejcha (Novy Jicin). Disclosures: Trneny: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

The incidence of biopsy-proven transformation in follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era. A retrospective analysis from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) database

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Janikova ◽  
Zbynek Bortlicek ◽  
Vit Campr ◽  
Natasa Kopalova ◽  
Katerina Benesova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Thirty-Five Year Follow-up Analysis of Follicular Lymphoma Patients Treated through the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group: Prognostic Factor Analysis and Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Amulya Yellala ◽  
Elizabeth R. Lyden ◽  
Heather Nutsch ◽  
Avyakta Kallam ◽  
Kai Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Secondary Malignancies ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and most common of the clinically indolent NHLs. Although often considered an incurable disease, overall survival has increased significantly with refinement in diagnostic techniques and the addition of rituximab. The course of FL is quite variable and presence of symptoms, organ dysfunction, cytopenias, aggressiveness of tumor are all taken into consideration when deciding individual treatment. In this study, we evaluated a large patient cohort with FL treated over a 35 year period for progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) based on FLIPI score, tumor grade, and treatment regimen and also looked at causes of late failures. Methods We evaluated 1037 patients (pts) from the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group that were diagnosed with FL between the years of 1983-2020. Descriptive statistics were stratified according to age, histological subtype, treatment regimen, FLIPI category, presence and type of secondary malignancy. PFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to progression or death and OS was the time from diagnosis to death from any cause. PFS and OS were plotted as Kaplan-Meier curves with statistically significant p&lt;0.05. Results The median age at diagnosis and treatment was 61 years (yrs, range 17-91). A total of 9.1% were characterized as FLIPI high risk, 37.8% intermediate risk, and 33.6% low risk, 19.5% unavailable. Among the histological grade, 23.1% had FL- grade 1, 30.2% FL-2, 27.3% FL-3A, 2.5 % FL-3B and 16.9 % Composite Lymphoma. Anthracycline + rituximab was given in 24.5% of pts, whereas 43.8% of pts received an anthracycline based regimen without rituximab, 9.8% received rituximab without an anthracycline and 10.6% received neither of these agents. 6.75% (70 pts) were later found to have secondary malignancies of which 11 pts had myelodysplastic syndrome, 10 pts had acute leukemia and 9 pts had lung cancer. With a median follow up of 9.2 yrs and a maximum of 36 yrs, 29.7% (308 pts) had not relapsed. The median PFS across all groups was 4.6 yrs (Fig 1) and OS was 12.1 yrs. Median OS was significantly longer in patients that received rituximab at 16.1 yrs as compared to patients that did not receive rituximab at 9.89 yrs (Fig 2). PFS was 8.6 yrs, 3.6 yrs and 2.1 yrs and OS was 15.1 yrs, 11.7 yrs and 4.9 yrs in FLIPI low, intermediate and high risk groups respectively (p=&lt;0.001) (Fig 3), suggesting that survival was influenced by FLIPI score. Median PFS in FL-3B and FL-3A was 9.2 yrs and 5.2 yrs respectively which is longer than 4.7 yrs and 4.2 yrs for FL-1 and FL-2 (p=0.24). OS in FL-3A and FL-3B subgroups was 10.8 yrs while it was 11.6 yrs and 14.3 yrs in FL-2 and FL-1 (P=0.081). PFS is significantly longer at 10.6 yrs in pts treated with both anthracycline and rituximab containing regimen as compared to 5.3 yrs in pts treated with rituximab alone and 3.05 yrs in pts that had only anthracycline based regimen (p=&lt;0.001) (Fig 4). The median OS also was significantly higher in the combination regimen group at 18.8 yrs as compared to 11.3 yrs in rituximab only group and 9 yrs in anthracycline based regimen group (p=&lt;0.001). When pts with FL-3A and FL-3B were grouped together and stratified according to treatment regimen, the group that received anthracycline and rituximab combination has highest PFS and OS at 13.3 yrs and 18.8 yrs (p&lt;0.001). when pts with FL-3A were analyzed separately and stratified by treatment regimen, the results of PFS and OS were similar and statistically significant. However, of the 24 pts in FL-3B group, analysis revealed that PFS and OS was longer in anthracycline based regimen only group, however results were not statistically significant. Among the pts that relapsed/died after 10 years (n=190), the cause of death was relapsed lymphoma in 13.7%, unknown in 55.8%, secondary malignancies in 4.2%, treatment related in 2.6% and not related to disease in 23.7%. A total of 278 pts survived &gt; 10 yrs, and of these pts, 119 (30%) had not relapsed at the last follow up. Conclusion The addition of rituximab to standard anthracycline based chemotherapy has resulted in significant improvements in the PFS and OS rates of FL. These results also support the prognostic value of the FLIPI in patients treated in the rituximab era. Late relapses after 10 yrs from disease can occur, but 11.5% of patients had not relapsed with long term follow up. Secondary malignancies are also an important consideration in the long term survivors. Disclosures Lunning: Acrotech: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aeratech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Armitage:Trovagene/Cardiff Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus Therapeutics: Consultancy; Ascentage: Consultancy. Vose:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Allogene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Wugen: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria; Loxo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment Outcome in Myeloid Leukemia of Down Syndrome in Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group From 2005 to 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Czogala ◽  
Katarzyna Pawinska-Wasikowska ◽  
Teofila Ksiazek ◽  
Barbara Sikorska-Fic ◽  
Michal Matysiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Pediatric Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Rituximab Overcomes Sex as a Strong Adverse Prognostic Factor for Treatment Outcome in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Analysis of Patients Treated with Rituximab/CHOP or CHOP in Randomized Trials of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3706-3706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Buske ◽  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Martin H. Dreyling ◽  
Roswitha Forstpointner ◽  
Michael Kneba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Abstract Abstract 3706 Poster Board III-642 Sex has been recognized as an important prognostic factor for the treatment outcome of patients with lymphoma. Thus, several retrospective analyses have shown that male sex is associated with an inferior outcome in advanced stage follicular lymphoma. This was confirmed in a retrospective analyses of 1795 patients with follicular lymphoma using Cox regression analysis, in which male sex was independently associated with inferior survival (Solal-Celigny et al., Blood 2004). We now analyzed the prognostic impact of sex on treatment outcome of 1172 patients with follicular lymphoma treated first line with CHOP or R-CHOP in prospectively randomized clinical trials of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). From these, 616 pts were treated with CHOP, 556 pts with R-CHOP. FLIPI was equally distributed between the two treatment arms (low risk 14% vs. 14%, intermediate risk 42% vs. 41% and high risk 44% vs. 45 %, respectively). 48% of the patients were male (50% in the CHOP and 46% in the R-CHOP arm). For all patients there was a significantly inferior time to treatment failure (TTF) for male patients with a median of 43 months compared to 61 months for female patients (p=0.0035). In the patient group treated with CHOP alone the median TTF was 30 months for male vs. 40 months for female patients (p=0.0041). The observation that male sex was associated with inferior treatment outcome was seen both in the elderly (above 60 yrs of age) as well as the younger patient group (below 60 yrs of age). However, after treatment with R-CHOP sex did not affect treatment outcome anymore with virtually the same results in male vs. female patients (for the total group and for patients < 60yrs TTF median not reached in both arms, p = n.s.; for pts > 60 yrs TTF 81 vs. 84 months, respectively, p=n.s.). In multivariate analysis, also adjusting for FLIPI risk factors, male sex showed up as an independent prognostic factor for patients treated with CHOP alone (HR 1.82; 1.32 – 2.5; p=0.0002), but not for patients treated with R-CHOP (HR 1.06; 0.68 - 1.66, p = 0.79; p=0.0476 for the interaction term of sex with Rituximab). Based on this, male patients had the highest benefit when rituximab was added to CHOP (R-CHOP vs. CHOP: male pts HR 0.31,0.21 - 0.46, p<0.0001 and female pts. HR 0.53, 0.37 - 0.76, p = 0.0005). These data demonstrate that Rituximab functions as an equalizer with regard to sex as a prognostic factor and underlines that well established prognostic factors may lose their predictive power with the emergence of novel effective treatment approaches. Disclosures: Buske: Roche: Honoraria. Hoster:Roche: travel support. Dreyling:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:BayerScheringAG: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hiddemann:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Unterhalt:Roche: .

Short Cycle of Immunochemotherapy Followed by Radiation Therapy Compared with Prolonged Cycles of Immunochemotherapy for Localized DLBCL: The Osaka Lymphoma Study Group (OLSG) Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1628-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Terada ◽  
Hironori Take ◽  
Hirohiko Shibayama ◽  
Koji Hashimoto ◽  
Maki Kuwayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Short Cycle ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Abstract Abstract 1628 Introduction: Standard treatment for localized diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been rather a short cycle of immunochemotherapy followed by involved field radiotherapy or prolonged cycles of immunochemotherapy. There is no convincing evidence in favor of either strategy. This retrospective analysis is an attempt to compare these treatment options. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had histologicaly newly diagnosed localized DLBCL by the Osaka Lymphoma Study Group (OLSG) central review panel and registered between 2003 and 2011, and received rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) like immunochemotherapy with more than three consecutive courses as initial therapy. In this study, we defined a localized DLBCL as DLBCL with Ann Arbor stage I or non-bulky (<10cm) stage II. One hundred thirty-seven localized DLBCL patients were analyzed retrospectively. Of 137 patients, 83 had 6 to 8 cycles of R-CHOP like immunochemotherapy (Chemo group), and 28 had 3 to 4 cycles of R-CHOP like immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (Chemo+RT group). In this study, the efficacy and tolerability of the 2 treatment groups, Chemo group and Chemo+RT group, in localized DLBCL patients were compared. Treatment outcomes were evaluated, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity were compared according to each treatment option and risk factor. Results: With a median follow-up time of 34 months, neither OS nor PFS differ between these treatment groups. The 3-year OS were 85.5% in Chemo group and 96.2% in Chemo+RT group, respectively (P=0.225). The 3-year PFS were 74.3% in Chemo group and 89.7% in Chemo+RT group, respectively (P=0.185). A multivariate Cox regression model showed that Chemo+RT group have a tendency to improve PFS [hazard ratio =0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.10–1.07; P =0.066] of localized DLBCL compared with Chemo group. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and neutopenic fever were more frequent in patients with Chemo group (P<0.01, P<0.01, respectively). Conclusion: For the treatment of localized DLBCL, although the difference between two treatment options was not significant in efficacy, short cycle of immunochemotherapy followed by radiation therapy seems to be superior to prolonged cycles of immunochemotherapy in terms of safety. Further studies are needed to define the optimal treatment option for localized DLBCL in the rituximab era. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Early Progression of Follicular Lymphoma- Retrospective Analysis of 2 Randomized Trials of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3464-3464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vindi Jurinovic ◽  
Bernd Metzner ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Hannes Wandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Early Progression ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Patients with early progression of disease (POD) have a remarkably poor outcome. Approximately 20% of patients with symptomatic, advanced stage FL experience POD within 24 months of first-line treatment (POD24) and have a 5-year overall survival (OS) of <50%, compared to >85% for patients without POD24 (Casulo et al, JCO 2015; Jurinovic et al, Blood 2016). The optimal salvage treatment for these high-risk patients is unclear. We aimed to assess the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) applied as 2nd-line treatment for patients with POD24 who -in principle- qualified for dose-intensified regimens. Methods: Patients with advanced stage FL from 2 successive randomized trials of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG1996 [MCP versus CHOP] and GLSG2000 [CHOP versus R-CHOP], followed by randomization for ASCT consolidation versus interferon maintenance, respectively) were eligible for retrospective analysis of 2nd-line treatment if they had progressive, relapsed or refractory FL (ie, less than a partial response), were <65 years, required treatment according to our established criteria, and had not received prior ASCT. Three patients who received an allogeneic transplant (alloTx) as 2nd-line treatment were excluded from this analysis. POD24 was defined as progressive, relapsed or refractory disease within 24 months after 1st-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were calculated from initiation of 2nd-line treatment (2nd-line PFS and 2nd line-OS, respectively). Results: The evaluable 162 patients were enriched for POD24 (113/162 [70%]). POD24 patients were more likely to receive ASCT as 2nd-line treatment (52/113 [46%] versus 11/49 [22%], p=0.008), whereas rituximab was more commonly added to 2nd-line regimens in patients without POD24 (48% versus 69%, p=0.018). With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, POD24 patients had a significantly shorter 5-year 2nd-line PFS and OS with 35% versus 53% (p=0.04) and 60% versus 83% (p=0.02), respectively, compared to patients without POD24. Within the POD24 group, 52 patients (46%) received ASCT, 54 (48%) received rituximab-containing regimens, 25 (22%) received both ASCT and rituximab as part of their 2nd-line treatment. Patients in the ASCT arm were younger (median age 47 versus 51 years, p=0.018) and more frequently male (73% versus 51%, p=0.026). The distribution of high-risk FLIPI (39% versus 46%, p=0.60), ECOG performance status >1 (10% versus 21%, p=0.15) and the addition of rituximab (48% versus 48%, p=1.0) was not significantly different between the ASCT and no-ASCT groups. In univariate analysis, ASCT for POD24 patients was associated with significantly higher 5-year 2nd-line PFS and OS rates of 51% versus 19% and 77% versus 46% (CI=[35;60]), respectively (Figure). The hazard ratios (HR) for 2nd-line PFS and OS were 0.36 (CI=[0.22;0.59], p<0.0001) and 0.50 (CI=[0.30;0.83], p=0.006). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ASCT had a stronger impact on favorable treatment outcome compared to the addition of rituximab: the HRs of ASCT for 2nd-line PFS and 2nd-line OS were 0.37 (CI=[0.21;0.63], p=0.0003) and 0.34 (CI=[0.21;0.56], p<0.0001), whereas the HRs of rituximab were 0.63 (CI=[0.39;1.00], p=0.05) and 0.64 (CI=[0.39;1.08], p=0.09), respectively. Finally, to account for the selection bias associated with retrospective studies, we considered patients as ASCT if there had been an attempt to collect an autograft. This included an additional 13 patients from the no-ASCT group and another patient who ultimately received an alloTx as 2nd-line treatment. In this intention-to-treat-like analysis the benefit of ASCT remained statistically significant with a HR=0.48 for 2nd line PFS (CI=[0.30;0.77], p=0.002) and a HR=0.50 for 2nd-line OS (CI=[0.30;0.83], p=0.006). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that ASCT is an effective 2nd-line treatment option for patients with high-risk FL as defined by the early progression of disease (POD24) who qualify for dose-intensified protocols, and should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials. It remains to be determined if ASCT is also an effective 1st-line treatment strategy for selected patients identified to be high-risk by pre-treatment risk classifiers, such as the recently established clinicogenetic risk-model m7-FLIPI. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document