Impact of high dose cytarabine dosing strategies in obese patients with acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 106517
Author(s):  
Madeleine A. Ochs ◽  
Anthony J. Perissinotti ◽  
Bernard L. Marini ◽  
Patrick W Burke ◽  
Dale L Bixby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110465
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Richter ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Kevin McCarthy ◽  
Timothy Kubal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Incidence Of Hospitalization ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.

scholarly journals A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]

Blood ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Bishop ◽  
JP Matthews ◽  
GA Young ◽  
J Szer ◽  
A Gillett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract High-dose cytarabine (ara-c) may overcome cytarabine resistance in leukemic blasts. It has been used as a successful salvage and in postremission therapy but not as initial induction treatment. Patients aged 15 to 60 years, presenting with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were randomized to receive either high-dose cytarabine, 3 g/m2 12 hourly on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 for 8 doses, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 days 1 to 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7, (HIDAC-3–7) or standard dose cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days with daunorubicin and etoposide at the same dose and schedule as above (7–3–7). Patients could receive a second or third induction course if complete remission (CR) was not achieved. All patients received the same postinduction consolidation therapy (5–2–5) for 2 courses. Eligible patients had no prior chemotherapy or myelodysplastic disease. Patients have been followed for a median of 4.5 years. Of 301 patients treated, complete response (CR) was achieved in 71% with HIDAC- 3–7 and 74% with 7–3–7. For patients in CR, the estimated median remission duration was 45 months with HIDAC-3–7 and 12 months with 7–3– 7 (P = .0005 univariate analysis, P = .0004 multivariate analysis). The estimated percentage of patients relapse free 5 years after achieving a CR was 49% on HIDAC-3–7 and 24% on 7–3–7. Patients in CR tended to survive longer with HIDAC-3–7 but there were no overall survival differences between the two arms. HIDAC-3–7 was associated with significantly more toxicity in induction with more leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting and eye toxicity (all P < .001) but a similar incidence of severe central nervous system and cerebellar toxicity compared to 7–3–7. The consolidation treatment was the same in both arms but caused significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients previously treated with HIDAC-3–7 induction (P < .0001). We conclude that a dose-effect exists for cytarabine in AML and that HIDAC- 3–7 prolongs remission duration and disease-free survival and is tolerable when used as initial induction therapy in patients with de novo AML.

Repetitive Cycles of High-Dose Cytarabine Benefit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): Results from CALGB 8461

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Andrew J. Carroll ◽  
Colin G. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To study the impact of repetitive (three to four courses) versus a single course of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) consolidation therapy on outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22). Patients and Methods We examined the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) for 48 adults younger than 60 years with inv(16)/t(16;16) who had attained a complete remission on one of four consecutive clinical trials and were assigned to receive HDAC consolidation therapy. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to either three or four courses of HDAC, and 20 patients were assigned to one course of HDAC followed by alternative intensive consolidation therapy. Results Pretreatment features were similar for the two groups. The CIR was significantly decreased in patients assigned to receive three to four cycles of HDAC compared with patients assigned to one course (P = .03; 5-year CIR, 43% v 70%, respectively). The difference in RFS also approached statistical significance (P = .06). In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for potential confounding covariates, only treatment assignment (three to four cycles of HDAC) predicted for superior RFS (P = .02). The OS of both groups was similar (P = .93; 5-year OS, 75% for the three to four cycles of HDAC group v 70% for the one cycle of HDAC group), reflecting a high success rate with stem-cell transplantation salvage treatment administered among patients in both treatment groups. Conclusion We conclude that, in AML patients with inv(16)/t(16;16), repetitive HDAC therapy decreases the likelihood of relapse compared with consolidation regimens including less HDAC.

Dose-related mucositis with hydroxyurea for cytoreduction in acute myeloid leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan L Trepte ◽  
Jessica J Auten ◽  
Stephen M Clark ◽  
Hendrik W van Deventer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Safety And Toxicity ◽  
Dosing Strategy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Hyperleukocytosis occurs in 15–20% of all newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients and requires emergent treatment with leukapheresis or hydroxyurea when accompanied by signs or symptoms of leukostasis. Currently, there is no standardized hydroxyurea dosing strategy, although usual dosing ranges from 50 to 150 mg/kg/day, and prescribing patterns vary significantly among oncologists and institutions. In addition to other hematologic and dermatologic toxicities, the use of hydroxyurea may be associated with significant mucositis and mucositis-related pain. The purpose of this study was to compare mucositis-related pain between two different hydroxyurea dosing strategies in patients who received hydroxyurea for cytoreduction during induction. A retrospective chart review of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with chemotherapy at UNC Medical Center from April 2014 to April 2016 who received at least one dose of hydroxyurea for cytoreduction was conducted. This study compared the safety and toxicity profiles of hydroxyurea in patients who received high-dose hydroxyurea (≥75 mg/kg/day) versus low-dose hydroxyurea (<75 mg/kg/day). Safety and toxicity were evaluated based on indicators of mucositis and cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements following induction chemotherapy. Data collection included baseline demographics, mucositis risk factors, baseline laboratory values, hydroxyurea dosing, mucositis indicators, and pain indicators. A total of 55 patients were included in the study, 21 patients (38.2%) received the high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy. The high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy had a significantly higher white blood cell count at diagnosis, increased duration of hydroxyurea, and received a higher cumulative dose of hydroxyurea. Additionally, the high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy patients were associated with significantly more grade 3 or 4 mucositis requiring a formulation change (0% versus 28.6%, p = 0.002) and significantly higher cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements during induction (p = 0.019). No significant differences in baseline demographics or mucositis risk factors between dosing strategies were identified. The high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy patients had a significant increase in cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements and formulation changes, both common interventions made for the treatment of mucositis. Additional studies are needed to further elucidate the safety and toxicity profiles of hydroxyurea dosing strategies and to explore the correlation between total cumulative hydroxyurea dose and total cumulative narcotic requirements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document