Multiple generations of mafic–ultramafic rocks from the Hongseong suture zone, western South Korea: Implications for the geodynamic evolution of NE Asia

Lithos ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 160-161 ◽  
pp. 68-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghoon Kwon ◽  
Sung Won Kim ◽  
M. Santosh
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 102-115
Author(s):  
Yousif Osman Mohammad ◽  
Nabaz Rashid Hama Aziz

The Pauza ultramafic body is part of Upper Cretaceous Ophiolitic massifs of the Zagros Suture Zone, NE Iraq. The present study reveals evidence of Ultra-high pressure (UHP), and deep mantle signature of these peridotites in the Zagros Suture Zone throughout the observation of backscattered images and micro analyses which have been performed on orthopyroxen crystals in lherzolite of Pauza ultramafic rocks.Theorthopyroxen shows abundant exsolution lamellae of coarse unevenly distributed clinopyroxene coupled with the submicron uniformly distributed needles of Cr-spinel. The observed clusters of Opx–Cpx–Spl represent the decompression products of pyrope-rich garnet produced as a result of the transition from ultra-high pressure garnet peridotite to low-pressure spinel peridotite (LP). Neoblastic olivine (Fo92 – 93) with abundant multi-form Cr- spinel inclusions occurs as a fine-grained aggregate around orthopyroxene, whereas coarse olivine (Fo90-91) free from chromian-spinel is found in matrix. The similarity of the Cr-spinel lamellae orientations in both olivine and orthopyroxene, moreover, the enrichments of both Cr and Fe3+ in the Cr-spinel inclusions in neoblastic olivine relative to Cr-spinel lamellae in orthopyroxene, suggest that spinel inclusions in olivine have been derived from former Cr-spinel lamellae in orthopyroxene. Neoblastic olivine is formed by reaction of silica-poor ascending melt and orthopyroxene. It is inferred that the olivines with multi-form spinel inclusions has been formed by incongruent melting of pre-existing spinel lamellae-rich orthopyroxene.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Dupuis ◽  
R. Hébert ◽  
V. Dubois-Côté ◽  
C. Guilmette ◽  
C.S. Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 1283-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi‐Bo Liu ◽  
Jing‐Chao Li ◽  
Tao Zhao ◽  
Yang Song ◽  
Guo‐Li Yuan ◽  
...  

Lithos ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 106594
Author(s):  
S. Sivaprabha ◽  
Irfan M. Bhat ◽  
T. Ahmad ◽  
T. Tanaka ◽  
S. Balakrishnan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Danelian ◽  
G. Galoyan ◽  
Y. Rolland ◽  
M. Sosson

Micropalaeontological age evidence for the sedimentary cover of ophiolites is important to understand the palaeogeographic and geodynamic evolution of Tethyan realms. The Stepanavan ophiolitic suite of Northern Armenia consists of peridotites, gabbros, plagiogranite and lavas with a radiolarite sedimentary cover. It is regarded as the northern extension of the Sevan Akera ophiolitic zone and may be considered as the eastern extension of the Izmir-Ankara suture zone. It represents the relics of a slow-spreading mid oceanic ridge that was active between Eurasia and the South-Armenian Block of Gondwanian origin. Radiolaria extracted from radiolarites of the Stepanavan ophiolite provide for the first time a Late Jurassic (late Kimmeridgian to early Tithonian) age constraint for this part of Tethyan oceanic crust preserved in Lesser Caucasus.


2021 ◽  
pp. jgs2021-034
Author(s):  
Ezzoura Errami ◽  
Ulf Linnemann ◽  
Jamal El Kabouri ◽  
Mandy Hofmann ◽  
Andreas Gärtner ◽  
...  

The comment of Ikenne et al. concerns recently described U-Pb baddeleyite ages, around 1.71 and 1.65 Ga, obtained on intrusive sills and dykes in the Taghdout-Lkest Group in the SW domain of the Anti-Atlas (AA). These authors suggest an independent geodynamic evolution of the eastern and western domains of the Anti-Atlas prior to the Ediacaran period. Furthermore, they state that we do not take this magmatic event into account when interpreting our data. We like to emphasize that this is beyond the scope of our paper and does not affect our interpretation of the AA evolution during the deposition of the Ediacaran sedimentary successions (Saghro, Mgouna, and Ouarzazate goups). We agree with the comment that we did not distinguish the Taghdout-Lkest from the Bleida-Tachdamt groups and now we separate them in the revised figure 2. The different geodynamic evolution of the SW and NE Anti-Atlas domains in pre-Ediacaran times sensu Ikenne et al., is not consistent with abundant inherited Paleoproterozoic zircon detritus and Nd model ages (0.80-1.82 Ga) from the northeastern Anti-Atlas and the Meseta. There is no doubt about Late Paleoproterozoic baddeleyite ages, but they do not have an analogue in the zircon age record of the West African Craton, which is expected from ultramafic rocks with few zircon grains. However, they locally allow assuming a Late Paleoproterozoic deposition of the lower Taghdout-Lkest Group. Any age constraints for the upper parts of this group are lacking, thus allowing a hypothetic deposition between ca. 1.65 Ga and 0.83 Ga (the assumed age of initial Bleida-Tachdamt Group deposition). Therefore, it is very important to close the gap in detailed stratigraphic studies that would allow differentiating between the different Late Paleoproterozoic and Early Neoproterozoic events including the stratigraphic position of the upper Taghdout-Lkest Group and Bleida-Tachdamt group.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Seo ◽  
Seon Gyu Choi ◽  
Chang Whan Oh ◽  
Sung Won Kim ◽  
Suck Hwan Song

Author(s):  
Grant Lowey

Waldien et al. (2021) present new bedrock geologic mapping, U-Pb geochronology, and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology from the eastern Alaska Range in south-central Alaska to determine the burial and exhumation history of metamorphic rocks associated with the Alaska Range suture zone, interpret the history of faults responsible for the burial and exhumation of the metamorphic rocks, and speculate on the relative importance of the Alaska Range suture zone and related structures during Cenozoic reactivation. They also propose that ultramafic rocks in their Ann Creek map area in south-central Alaska (herein referred to as the “Ann Creek ultramafic complex”) correlate with the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex in southwestern Yukon, and that this correlation is “consistent with other estimates of >400 km” of offset on the Denali fault. However, despite Waldien et al.’s (2021) claim that the purportedly offset ultramafic rocks are “similar” and that characteristics of the Ann Creek ultramafic complex “make a strong case” for a faulted portion of an Alaska-type ultramafic intrusion, their paper gives short shrift in describing the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex and in discussing previous estimates of displacement on the Denali fault. In Addition, Waldien et al. (2021) are either unaware of or ignore several key references of the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex and estimates of displacement on the Denali fault. As a result, Waldien et al.’s (2021) claim of a “correlation” between allegedly offset ultramafic rocks is suspect, and their reference to “other estimates of >400 km” of offset on the Denali fault is incorrect, or at the very least misleading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document