Deterministic Tools to Estimate Induction Time for Methane Hydrate Formation in the Presence of Luvicap 55 W Solutions

2021 ◽  
pp. 118374
Author(s):  
Marziyeh Zare ◽  
Sohrab Zendehboudi ◽  
Majid Abedinzadegan Abdi
Author(s):  
Sotirios Nik Longinos ◽  
Mahmut Parlaktuna

Abstract This study investigates the effects of types of impellers and baffles on methane hydrate formation. Induction time, water conversion to hydrates (hydrate yield), hydrate formation rate and hydrate productivity are components that were estimated. The initial hydrate formation rate is generally higher with the use of Ruston turbine (RT) with higher values 28.93 × 10−8 mol/s in RT/RT with full baffle (FB) experiment, but the decline rate of hydrate formation was also high compared to up-pumping pitched blade turbine (PBTU). Power consumption is higher also in RT/RT and PBT/RT with higher value 392,000 W in PBT/RT with no baffle (NB) experiment compared to PBT/PBT and RT/PBT experiments respectively. Induction time values are higher in RT/RT experiments compared to PBT/PBT ones. Hydrate yield is always smaller when there is no baffle in all four groups of experiments while the higher values exist in experiments with full baffle. It should be noticed that PBT is the same with PBTU, since all experiments with mixed flow have upward trending.


Author(s):  
Ryo Nozawa ◽  
Mohammad Ferdows ◽  
Kazuhiko Murakami ◽  
Masahiro Ota

In this paper, we suggest the advanced method of methane hydrate formation by cyclodextrin solutions. The structures of the methane hydrate were experimentally investigated by Raman spectroscopy. The induction time of the methane hydrate formation becomes by shorter 10–30 times and formation rate become by faster 2–4 times originated in the increased methane concentration of hydrate formation water by adding cyclodextrins. The results by the Raman spectroscopy indicate that the structure I methane hydrate is produced and methane molecules exist in both Large and Small cages.


Energy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 604-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Chen ◽  
Guang-Jin Chen ◽  
Qing Yuan ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Li-Ming Tao ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6518
Author(s):  
Warintip Chanakro ◽  
Chutikan Jaikwang ◽  
Katipot Inkong ◽  
Santi Kulprathipanja ◽  
Pramoch Rangsunvigit

Two widely investigated methane hydrate promoters, tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) and cyclopentane (CP), for methane hydrate formation and dissociation were comparatively investigated in the quiescent reactor at 2.5 °C and 8 MPa. The results indicated that the increase in the mass fraction TBAB decreased the induction time. However, it did not significantly affect the methane uptake. In the presence of CP, the increase in the CP concentration resulted in an increase in the induction time due to the increasing thicknesses of the CP layer in the unstirred reactor. Moreover, the methane uptake was varied proportionally with the CP concentration. The addition of TBAB resulted in a higher methane uptake than that of CP, since the presence of TBAB provided the cavities in the hydrate structure to accommodate the methane gas during the hydrate formation better than that of CP. On the contrary, the presence of CP significantly increased the induction time. Although the methane recovery remained relatively the same regardless of TBAB and CP concentrations, the recovery was higher in the presence of TBAB.


2016 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanrong Wang ◽  
Mingjun Yang ◽  
Weiguo Liu ◽  
Jiafei Zhao ◽  
Yongchen Song

2017 ◽  
Vol 204 (12) ◽  
pp. 1420-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Mohammadi ◽  
Mehrdad Manteghian ◽  
Amir H. Mohammadi ◽  
Alireza Jahangiri

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pandey ◽  
Daas ◽  
von Solms

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is a well-known surfactant, which can accelerate methane hydrate formation. In this work, methane hydrate formation kinetics were studied in the presence of SDS using a rocking cell apparatus in both temperature-ramping and isothermal modes. Ramping and isothermal experiments together suggest that SDS concentration plays a vital role in the formation kinetics of methane hydrate, both in terms of induction time and of final gas uptake. There is a trade-off between growth rate and gas uptake for the optimum SDS concentration, such that an increase in SDS concentration decreases the induction time but also decreases the gas storage capacity for a given volume. The experiments also confirm the potential use of the rocking cell for investigating hydrate promoters. It allows multiple systems to run in parallel at similar experimental temperature and pressure conditions, thus shortening the total experimentation time. Understanding methane hydrate formation and storage using SDS can facilitate large-scale applications such as natural gas storage and transportation.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 5200
Author(s):  
Fatima Doria Benmesbah ◽  
Livio Ruffine ◽  
Pascal Clain ◽  
Véronique Osswald ◽  
Olivia Fandino ◽  
...  

Assessing the influence of key parameters governing the formation of hydrates and determining the capacity of the latter to store gaseous molecules is needed to improve our understanding of the role of natural gas hydrates in the oceanic methane cycle. Such knowledge will also support the development of new industrial processes and technologies such as those related to thermal energy storage. In this study, high-pressure laboratory methane hydrate formation and dissociation experiments were carried out in a sandy matrix at a temperature around 276.65 K. Methane was continuously injected at constant flowrate to allow hydrate formation over the course of the injection step. The influence of water saturation, methane injection flowrate and particle size on hydrate formation kinetics and methane storage capacity were investigated. Six water saturations (10.8%, 21.6%, 33%, 43.9%, 55% and 66.3%), three gas flowrates (29, 58 and 78 mLn·min−1) and three classes of particle size (80–140, 315–450 and 80–450 µm) were tested, and the resulting data were tabulated. Overall, the measured induction time obtained at 53–57% water saturation has an average value of 58 ± 14 min minutes with clear discrepancies that express the stochastic nature of hydrate nucleation, and/or results from the heterogeneity in the porosity and permeability fields of the sandy core due to heterogeneous particles. Besides, the results emphasize a clear link between the gas injection flowrate and the induction time whatever the particle size and water saturation. An increase in the gas flowrate from 29 to 78 mLn·min−1 is accompanied by a decrease in the induction time up to ~100 min (i.e., ~77% decrease). However, such clear behaviour is less conspicuous when varying either the particle size or the water saturation. Likewise, the volume of hydrate-bound methane increases with increasing water saturation. This study showed that water is not totally converted into hydrates and most of the calculated conversion ratios are around 74–84%, with the lowest value of 49.5% conversion at 54% of water saturation and the highest values of 97.8% for the lowest water saturation (10.8%). Comparison with similar experiments in the literature is also carried out herein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document