scholarly journals Assessing the completeness of reporting of observational studies in Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. Cross sectional study

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Mary Bravo-Peña ◽  
Luis Barona-Fong ◽  
Julio Campo-López ◽  
Yeni Arroyave ◽  
José Andrés Calvache
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Mary Bravo-Peña ◽  
Luis Barona-Fong ◽  
Julio Campo-López ◽  
Yeni Arroyave ◽  
José Andrés Calvache

Author(s):  
Soheila SHAGHAGHIAN ◽  
Behrooz ASTANEH

Background: Although much medical knowledge comes from observational research, such studies are more prone to confounding and bias than others. This study was conducted to evaluate the adherence of the observational studies published in Iranian medical journals to the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) statement. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we selected 150 articles of Iranian medical journals, using multistage sampling from Aug 2016 to Jun 2017. The reported items of the STROBE statement in the articles was determined and considered as the adherence of the articles to the statement. The adherence of the articles with different characteristics was compared. Results: The adherence of the articles to the statement varied from 24% to 68% with a mean score of 48%±9%. The lowest mean scores were found in the Result (36%) and Method (49%) sections. The adherence was significantly better in the articles published in the journals indexed in PubMed or Web of Knowledge (ISI) databases (P<0.001) and those written by cooperation of the authors from other countries (P=0.044). Conclusion: The evaluated articles in our study had not adequately reported the items recommended by the STROBE statement. This indicates deficiency in key elements for readers to assess the validity and applicability of a study.  


Author(s):  
Rokiah Mamikutty ◽  
Ameera Syafiqah Aly ◽  
Jamaludin Marhazlinda

In conducting a systematic review, assessing the risk of bias of the included studies is a vital step; thus, choosing the most pertinent risk of bias (ROB) tools is crucial. This paper determined the most appropriate ROB tools for assessing observational studies in a systematic review assessing the association between anthropometric measurements and dental caries among children. First, we determined the ROB tools used in previous reviews on a similar topic. Subsequently, we reviewed articles on ROB tools to identify the most recommended ROB tools for observational studies. Of the twelve ROB tools identified from the previous steps, three ROB tools that best fit the eight criteria of a good ROB tool were the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and case-control studies, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) for a cross-sectional study. We further assessed the inter-rater reliability for all three tools by analysing the percentage agreement, inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa score. The overall percentage agreements and reliability scores of these tools ranged from good to excellent. Two ROB tools for the cross-sectional study were further evaluated qualitatively against nine of a tool’s advantages and disadvantages. Finally, the AHRQ and NOS were selected as the most appropriate ROB tool to assess cross-sectional and cohort studies in the present review.


2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (9) ◽  
pp. 1013-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khemayanto Hidayat ◽  
Lu-Gang Yu ◽  
Jin-Rong Yang ◽  
Xue-Ying Zhang ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
...  

AbstractThe association between milk consumption and the metabolic syndrome remains inconclusive, and data from Chinese populations are scarce. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between milk consumption and the metabolic syndrome and its components among the residents of Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, China. A total of 5149 participants were included in the final analysis. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate the OR and 95 % CI for the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its components according to milk consumption. In addition, the results of our study were further meta-analysed with other published observational studies to quantify the association between the highest v. lowest categories of milk consumption and the metabolic syndrome and its components. There was no significant difference in the odds of having the metabolic syndrome between milk consumers and non-milk consumers (OR 0·86, 95 % CI 0·73, 1·01). However, milk consumers had lower odds of having elevated waist circumference (OR 0·78, 95 % CI 0·67, 0·92), elevated TAG (OR 0·83, 95 % CI 0·70, 0·99) and elevated blood pressure (OR 0·85, 95 % CI 0·73, 0·99). When the results were pooled together with other published studies, higher milk consumption was inversely associated with the risk of the metabolic syndrome (relative risk 0·80, 95 % CI 0·72, 0·88) and its components (except elevated fasting blood glucose); however, these results should be treated with caution as high heterogeneity was observed. In summary, the currently available evidence from observational studies suggests that higher milk consumption may be inversely associated with the metabolic syndrome.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura McDonald ◽  
Anna Schultze ◽  
Alex Simpson ◽  
Sophie Graham ◽  
Radek Wasiak ◽  
...  

In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e017462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Chauvin ◽  
David Moher ◽  
Doug Altman ◽  
David L Schriger ◽  
Sabina Alam ◽  
...  

IntroductionSystematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative online tool to the usual peer reviewer process in evaluating the completeness of reporting and switched primary outcomes in completed reports.Methods and analysisThis is a cross-sectional study of individual two-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in the BioMed Central series medical journals,BMJ,BMJ OpenandAnnals of Emergency Medicineand indexed with the publication type ‘Randomised Controlled Trial’. First, we will develop an online tool and training module based (a) on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist and the Explanation and Elaboration document that would be dedicated to junior peer reviewers for assessing the completeness of reporting of key items and (b) the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Outcome Monitoring Project process used to identify switched outcomes in completed reports of the primary results of RCTs when initially submitted. Then, we will compare the performance of early career peer reviewers who use the online tool to the usual peer review process in identifying inadequate reporting and switched outcomes in completed reports of RCTs at initial journal submission. The primary outcome will be the mean number of items accurately classified per manuscript. The secondary outcomes will be the mean number of items accurately classified per manuscript for the CONSORT items and the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio to detect the item as adequately reported and to identify a switch in outcomes. We aim to include 120 RCTs and 120 early career peer reviewers.Ethics and disseminationThe research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the INSERM Institutional Review Board (21 January 2016). The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent.Trial registration numberNCT03119376.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Helal ◽  
Gabriel Gonçalves da Costa ◽  
Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves ◽  
Barbara Okabaisse Luizetti ◽  
Guilherme Weiss Freccia ◽  
...  

This pre-print refers to a protocol of a study which intends to explore outcome reporting bias in an extensive sample of the non-pharmacological literature and also to access the completeness of reporting of outcomes of such trials.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura McDonald ◽  
Anna Schultze ◽  
Alex Simpson ◽  
Sophie Graham ◽  
Radek Wasiak ◽  
...  

In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document