Combustion behaviour of biochars thermally pretreated via torrefaction, slow pyrolysis, or hydrothermal carbonisation and co-fired with pulverised coal

2020 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 867-877
Author(s):  
Lichun Chen ◽  
Chang Wen ◽  
Wenyu Wang ◽  
Tianyu Liu ◽  
Enze Liu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Francisco Everton Tavares de Luna ◽  
Laionel Guedes ◽  
Herculano Telino Macau ◽  
Rennan Jackson Ferreira Macedo

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Ali Umut Şen ◽  
Helena Pereira

In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in char production from lignocellulosic biomass due to the fact of char’s interesting technological properties. Global char production in 2019 reached 53.6 million tons. Barks are among the most important and understudied lignocellulosic feedstocks that have a large potential for exploitation, given bark global production which is estimated to be as high as 400 million cubic meters per year. Chars can be produced from barks; however, in order to obtain the desired char yields and for simulation of the pyrolysis process, it is important to understand the differences between barks and woods and other lignocellulosic materials in addition to selecting a proper thermochemical method for bark-based char production. In this state-of-the-art review, after analyzing the main char production methods, barks were characterized for their chemical composition and compared with other important lignocellulosic materials. Following these steps, previous bark-based char production studies were analyzed, and different barks and process types were evaluated for the first time to guide future char production process designs based on bark feedstock. The dry and wet pyrolysis and gasification results of barks revealed that application of different particle sizes, heating rates, and solid residence times resulted in highly variable char yields between the temperature range of 220 °C and 600 °C. Bark-based char production should be primarily performed via a slow pyrolysis route, considering the superior surface properties of slow pyrolysis chars.


2021 ◽  
pp. 125567
Author(s):  
B. Babinszki ◽  
Z. Sebestyén ◽  
E. Jakab ◽  
L. Kőhalmi ◽  
J. Bozi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 105043
Author(s):  
Md Zahangir Hossain ◽  
Md Mezbaul Bahar ◽  
Binoy Sarkar ◽  
Scott Wilfred Donne ◽  
Peter Wade ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marleena Hagner ◽  
Mari Räty ◽  
Johanna Nikama ◽  
Kimmo Rasa ◽  
Sari Peltonen ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Filippo Marchelli ◽  
Giorgio Rovero ◽  
Massimo Curti ◽  
Elisabetta Arato ◽  
Barbara Bosio ◽  
...  

Valorising biomass waste and producing renewable energy or materials is the aim of several conversion technologies. In this work, we consider two residues from different production chains: lignocellulosic residues from agriculture and wool residues from sheep husbandry. These materials are produced in large quantities, and their disposal is often costly and challenging for farmers. For their valorisation, we focus on slow pyrolysis for the former and water hydrolysis for the latter, concisely presenting the main literature related to these two processes. Pyrolysis produces the C-rich biochar, suitable for soil amending. Hydrolysis produces a N-rich fertiliser. We demonstrate how these two processes could be fruitfully integrated, as their products can be flexibly mixed to produce fertilisers. This solution would allow the achievement of balanced and tuneable ratios between C and N and the enhancement of the mechanical properties. We propose scenarios for this combined valorisation and for its coupling with other industries. As a result, biomass waste would be returned to the field, following the principles of circular economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document