The association between manual mode defibrillation, pre-shock pause duration and appropriate shock delivery when employed by basic life support paramedics during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Cheskes ◽  
Morgan Hillier ◽  
Adam Byers ◽  
P. Richard Verbeek ◽  
Ian R. Drennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Pause Duration ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Manual Mode

Abstract 98: The Association Between Manual Mode Defibrillation, Preshock Pause Duration and Appropriate Shock Delivery When Employed by Basic Life Support Paramedics During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Cheskes ◽  
Morgan Hillier ◽  
Cathy Zhan ◽  
Adam Byers ◽  
P R Verbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Pause Duration ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Inappropriate Shocks ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Manual Mode

BACKGROUND: Pre-shock pause duration of < 20 seconds is associated with improved survival after cardiac arrest. Manual mode defibrillation has been associated with the shortest duration of pre-shock pause but is largely practiced by paramedics (EMT-P) whereas defibrillator only providers (EMT-D) routinely use the defibrillator in automatic mode. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the relationship between manual mode defibrillation, pre-shock pause duration and shock appropriateness when defibrillation is provided by EMT-P vs. EMT-D level of providers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all treated non-traumatic adult OHCA presenting in a shockable rhythm over a one year period beginning January 1, 2012. Our primary outcome measure was the proportion of manual mode shocks delivered by EMT-D’s with pre- shock pause duration of < 20 secs when compared to EMT-P’s. Our secondary outcome measures were the duration of pre-, post- and peri-shock pause and the proportion of appropriate shocks (defined as correct identification and shock delivery to patients in a shockable rhythm) delivered by either level of provider. This study had a power of 90% to detect an absolute difference of 15% between provider levels in proportion of shocks delivered with pre-shock pause duration <20 secs. RESULTS: Among 2019 treated OHCA, 335(20%) presented in a shockable rhythm. Manual defibrillation was performed in 155 (46%) of these cases (196 shocks by EMT-P, 143 shocks by EMT-D). There were no differences in the proportion of shocks delivered with pre-shock pause duration <20 secs (EMT-P 82.8% vs EMT-D 84.8%, p =.65) nor pre-shock pause duration (sec) (median, Q1, Q3); EMT-P: 12.0 (7.0,17.0) vs. EMT-D: 11.0 (5.0,17.0), p= .13 while EMT-D had shorter peri- shock pause duration (sec) (median, Q1, Q3); EMT-P: 17.0 (12.0, 23.0) vs. EMT-D: 15.0 (9.0, 22.0), p =.03. There were no differences in the rate of inappropriate shocks (EMT-P 1.0% vs EMT-D 0.7%), p=1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Manual mode defibrillation by EMT-D’s produced similar measures of pre-shock pause when compared to EMT-P’s without increasing the rate of inappropriate shocks. More widespread use of EMT-D manual mode defibrillation may have the potential to decrease shock pause duration and improve survival.

Knowledge and Skills of Lay Participants Training with Basic Life Support Program in Case of Cardiac Arrest

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. S44-S48
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Lay People ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is an important cause that leads to hospital admission and death. Improving lay people’s knowledge and skills in basic life support (BLS) may lead to reduced death associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. “BLS NU KKU” is a BLS training program developed from up-to-date literature as a smartphone application used to train lay people in the community. Objective: To evaluate BLS-related knowledge and skills of participants before and after BLS training. Materials and Methods: A one group pretest-posttest design was used to implement the present study in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Participants were 350 individuals age 18 and older. An 8-hour BLS training session was offered to 10 groups of 35 participants over the period of 10 months between November 2018 and August 2019. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess BLS knowledge and Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills. Results: The mean score for BLS-related knowledge significantly increased after the BLS training (mean = 15.05, SD = 2.51) compared to the scores before the training (mean = 10.47, SD = 3.43) (p<0.05). BLS skills improved from 0% to 100% (p<0.001) will all skills rated with mostly “excellent” and “good”. Satisfaction with the training program was also rated mostly with “excellent” and “good”. Conclusion: The BLS training program effectively improved participants’ knowledge and skills for basic life support. This program should be disseminated to train lay people in other settings. Keywords: Basic life support, Cardiac arrest, Mobile application

scholarly journals External validation of multimodal termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the COVID-19 era

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haewon Jung ◽  
Mijin Lee ◽  
Jae Wan Cho ◽  
Sang Hun Lee ◽  
Suk Hee Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Life Support ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: Futile resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 era can lead to risk of disease transmission and unnecessary transport. Various existing basic or advanced life support (BLS or ALS, respectively) rules for the termination of resuscitation (TOR) have been derived and validated in North America and Asian countries. This study aimed to evaluate the external validation of these rules in predicting the survival outcomes of OHCA patients in the COVID-19 era.Methods: This was a multicenter observational study using the WinCOVID-19 Daegu registry data collected during February 18–March 31, 2020. The subjects were patients who showed cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology. The outcomes of each rule were compared to the actual patient survival outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive value (FPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of each TOR rule were evaluated. Results: In total, 170 of the 184 OHCA patients were eligible and evaluated. TOR was recommended for 122 patients based on the international basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS-TOR) rule, which showed 85% specificity, 74% sensitivity, 0.8% FPV, and 99% PPV for predicting unfavorable survival outcomes. When the traditional BLS-TOR rules and KoCARC TOR rule II were applied to our registry, one patient met the TOR criteria but survived at hospital discharge. With regard to the FPV (upper limit of 95% confidence interval <5%), specificity (100%), and PPV (>99%) criteria, only the KoCARC TOR rule I, which included a combination of three factors including not being witnessed by emergency medical technicians, presenting with an asystole at the scene, and not experiencing prehospital shock delivery or return of spontaneous circulation, was found to be superior to all other TOR rules. Conclusion: Among the previous nine BLS and ALS TOR rules, KoCARC TOR rule I was most suitable for predicting poor survival outcomes and showed improved diagnostic performance. Further research on variations in resources and treatment protocols among facilities, regions, and cultures will be useful in determining the feasibility of TOR rules for COVID-19 patients worldwide.

scholarly journals 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Duff ◽  
Alexis A. Topjian ◽  
Marc D. Berg ◽  
Melissa Chan ◽  
Sarah E. Haskell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association pediatric basic life support guidelines follows the 2019 systematic review of the effects of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) on survival of infants and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This systematic review and the primary studies identified were analyzed by the Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It aligns with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s continuous evidence review process, with updates published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review based on new published evidence. This update summarizes the available pediatric evidence supporting DA-CPR and provides treatment recommendations for DA-CPR for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Four new pediatric studies were reviewed. A systematic review of this data identified the association of a significant improvement in the rates of bystander CPR and in survival 1 month after cardiac arrest with DA-CPR. The writing group recommends that emergency medical dispatch centers offer DA-CPR for presumed pediatric cardiac arrest, especially when no bystander CPR is in progress. No recommendation could be made for or against DA-CPR instructions when bystander CPR is already in progress.

Meta-analysis of the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H Ebell ◽  
Akke Vellinga ◽  
Siobhan Masterson ◽  
Phillip Yun
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Low Rate

BackgroundOur objective was to perform a systematic review of studies reporting the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules (TORRs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).MethodsWe performed a comprehensive search of the literature for studies evaluating the accuracy of TORRs, with two investigators abstracting relevant data from each study regarding study design, study quality and the accuracy of the TORRs. Bivariate meta-analysis was performed using the mada procedure in R.ResultsWe identified 14 studies reporting the performance of 9 separate TORRs. The sensitivity (proportion of eventual survivors for whom the TORR recommends resuscitation and transport) was generally high: 95% for the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) TORR, 97% for the basic life support (BLS) TORR and 99% for the advanced life support (ALS) TORR. The BLS and ERC TORR were more specific, which would lead to fewer futile transports, and all three of these TORRs had a miss rate of ≤0.13% (defined as a case where a patient is recommended for termination but survives). The pooled proportion of patients for whom each rule recommends TOR was much higher for the ERC and BLS TORRs (93.5% and 74.8%, respectively) than for the ALS TORR (29.0%).ConclusionsThe BLS and ERC TORRs identify a large proportion of patients who are candidates for termination of resuscitation following OHCA while having a very low rate of misclassifying eventual survivors (<0.1%). Further prospective validation of the ERC TORR and direct comparison with BLS TORR are needed.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-87
Author(s):  
Jerry P Nolan ◽  
Christian Hassager
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Neurological Injury ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Medical Emergencies ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Cardiac arrest is the most extreme of medical emergencies. If the victim is to have any chance of high-quality neurological recovery, cardiac arrest must be diagnosed quickly, followed by summoning for help as basic life support (chest compressions and ventilations) is started. In most cases, the initial rhythm will be shockable, but this will have often deteriorated to a non-shockable rhythm by the time a monitor and/or defibrillator is applied. While basic life support will sustain some oxygen delivery to the heart and brain and will help to slow the rate of deterioration in these vital organs, it is important to achieve restoration of a spontaneous circulation as soon as possible (by defibrillation if the rhythm is shockable). Once return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, the quality of post-cardiac arrest management will influence the patient's final neurological and cardiological outcome. These interventions aim to restore myocardial function and minimize neurological injury.

Abstract 19542: A North American Survey of Public Opinion on the Acceptability of Crowdsourcing Basic Life Support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie N Dainty ◽  
Steven Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
North American ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Public Access ◽  
The North ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Use Of Social Media ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Performance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been shown to increase the odds of survival to hospital discharge more than 3-fold. The PulsePoint Respond™ Application (App) is a novel system that can be implemented by EMS to crowdsource basic life support for victims of OHCA. The system sends cardiac arrest notifications to a user’s mobile device which includes the location of the emergency and nearby public access defibrillators to facilitate bystander CPR and AED use while EMS personnel are en route. We conducted a North American survey to evaluate public perceptions of such an application, including acceptability and willingness to respond to alerts. Methods: The web-based survey was conducted in Canada and the USA by an established external polling vendor, Ipsos Reid. Sampling was designed to ensure broad representation of gender, age, geography, and spoken language following recent census statistics. Respondents were presented with a short concept description of cardiac arrest and the Pulsepoint app in text format followed by 6 closed-ended and 4 open-ended questions. Results: A random sample of 2,415 total surveys were collected (1106 from Canada and 1309 from the US). 70% of Canadian respondents but only 47% of US respondents had been trained in CPR at some point. On average, 79.5% of respondents agreed that Pulsepoint is something they would like to see in their community and 59.5% said they would download the App. 80% of Canadians and 77% of Americans were comfortable with receiving help in a public setting (street, office, etc) and 72 and 68% respectively, indicated they would be comfortable with receiving help in a private setting (home). Less than 40% of respondents identified concerns; as expected those identified included training concerns and trust issues. An average of 89% of the sample from both countries felt it was important that responders have up-to-date CPR certification. Conclusions: Overall, the North American public find the concept of the Pulsepoint application and crowdsourcing basic life support for OHCA acceptable and would be willing to respond. This is encouraging insight to support the use of social media to increasing bystander CPR rates in North America.

Prevention of deterioration of ventricular fibrillation by basic life support during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Resuscitation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinier A. Waalewijn ◽  
Marië A Nijpels ◽  
Jan G Tijssen ◽  
Rudolph W Koster
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document