Influence of Early Graft Function After Renal Transplantation and Its Impact on Long-Term Graft and Patient Survival

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 2856-2858 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pita-Fernández ◽  
F. Valdés-Cañedo ◽  
T. Seoane-Pillado ◽  
D. Lorenzo-Aguiar ◽  
J. Oliver-Garcia ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 692-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Mun Woo ◽  
Alan G. Jardine ◽  
Alan F. Clark ◽  
Mark S. Macgregor ◽  
Adrian W. Bowman ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1653-1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Fernández-Fresnedo ◽  
E Rodrigo ◽  
R Escallada ◽  
A.L.M de Francisco ◽  
J.A Zubimendi ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 3594-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pita ◽  
F. Valdes ◽  
A. Alonso ◽  
C.F. Rivera ◽  
M. Cao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Alfredo Podestà ◽  
Giuseppe Remuzzi ◽  
Federica Casiraghi

Transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for the failure of several solid organs, including the kidneys, liver, heart, lung and small bowel. The use of tailored immunosuppressive agents has improved graft and patient survival remarkably in early post-transplant stages, but long-term outcomes are frequently unsatisfactory due to the development of chronic graft rejection, which ultimately leads to transplant failure. Moreover, prolonged immunosuppression entails severe side effects that severely impact patient survival and quality of life. The achievement of tolerance, i.e., stable graft function without the need for immunosuppression, is considered the Holy Grail of the field of solid organ transplantation. However, spontaneous tolerance in solid allograft recipients is a rare and unpredictable event. Several strategies that include peri-transplant administration of non-hematopoietic immunomodulatory cells can safely and effectively induce tolerance in pre-clinical models of solid organ transplantation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), non-hematopoietic cells that can be obtained from several adult and fetal tissues, are among the most promising candidates. In this review, we will focus on current pre-clinical evidence of the immunomodulatory effect of MSC in solid organ transplantation, and discuss the available evidence of their safety and efficacy in clinical trials.


2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 2167-2169 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Sienko ◽  
M Wisniewska ◽  
M Ostrowski ◽  
K Ciechanowski ◽  
K Safranow ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karol Graňák ◽  
Vnuäã¡k Matej ◽  
Petra Skálová ◽  
Juraj Miklušica ◽  
Ľudovít Laca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Kidneys from expanded criteria donors with diagnosis of brain death have become a part of the organ transplant program, which have thus increased the number of transplants. Method In this retrospective analysis, we identified the expanded criteria donors in a group of 156 kidney donors at our center. Basic parameters of the donors before kidney recovery were collected. Graft function, graft survival, and patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant were compared in expanded criteria versus standard criteria donors. Results Expanded criteria donors were significantly older than standard criteria donors (P < .001), had higher body mass index (P = .006), and had more frequent arterial hypertension (P < .001) and diabetes mellitus (P = .004) in their histories. When we considered the estimated glomerular filtration rate, graft function in the first 6 months after transplant was significantly worse in kidneys from expanded criteria donors (P = .011). In addition, recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors had significantly worse survival in the first year posttransplant (P = .023); however, no differences in graft survival were observed. Conclusion From the long-term aspect, graft function and graft and patient survival in cases of kidneys from expanded criteria donors were comparable to results with kidneys from standard criteria donors. Expanded use of organs available for transplant is important due to the constantly increasing demands versus limited offers of organs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-356
Author(s):  
Nicole Bischof ◽  
Caroline Wehmeier ◽  
Michael Dickenmann ◽  
Patricia Hirt-Minkowski ◽  
Patrizia Amico ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and CMV replication are considered as risk factors for inferior graft and patient survival after renal transplantation, but long-term outcome data are limited. The aim of this retrospective single-centre study was to investigate the impact of CMV serostatus and CMV replication/disease on long-term outcomes in a well-defined cohort managed by a standardized CMV prevention/treatment protocol. Methods We investigated 599 consecutive kidney transplantations having a CMV prevention protocol consisting of either prophylaxis (D+/R− and R+ with ATG induction) or screening/deferred therapy (R+ without ATG induction). Patients were grouped according to CMV serostatus [high risk (D+/R−): n = 122; intermediate risk (R+): n = 306; low risk (D−/R−): n = 171] and occurrence of CMV replication/disease (no CMV replication: n = 419; asymptomatic CMV replication: n = 110; CMV syndrome: n = 39; tissue-invasive CMV disease: n = 31). The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. Results Graft and patient survival were not different among the three CMV serostatus groups as well as the four CMV replication/disease groups (P ≥ 0.44). Eighty-seven patients died, 17 due to infections (21%), but none was attributable to CMV. The overall hospitalization incidence for CMV-related infection was 3% (17/599 patients). The incidence of clinical and (sub)clinical rejection was similar among the groups (P ≥ 0.17). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, neither CMV serostatus, nor CMV replication, nor CMV disease were independent predictors for patient death or graft failure, respectively. Conclusions This retrospective single-centre study suggests that the negative impact of CMV infection on long-term patient and allograft survival as well as on allograft rejection can be largely eliminated with current diagnostic/therapeutic management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document