Characterization and diversity of Babesia sp. YLG, a new member of the Peircei group infecting Mediterranean yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis)

2021 ◽  
pp. 101852
Author(s):  
Claire Bonsergent ◽  
Marion Vittecoq ◽  
Carole Leray ◽  
Louisiane Burkart ◽  
Karen D. McCoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep del Hoyo ◽  
Nigel Collar ◽  
Guy M. Kirwan ◽  
Chris Sharpe ◽  
Ernest Garcia
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Canestrelli ◽  
Fulvio Fraticelli

A Yellow-legged Gull catching a Feral Pigeon, flies to a nearby small lake and kills him drowning. This behaviour can be explained or with higher cognitive ability, related with the use of innovative methods, or with a generalist behaviour that offers the opportunity to use new techniques.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentín Pérez-Mellado ◽  
Mario Garrido ◽  
Zaida Ortega ◽  
Ana Pérez-Cembranos ◽  
Abraham Mencía

Lizards and gulls cohabit in several Mediterranean islands. The yellow-legged gull, Larus michahellis, was found to prey several vertebrate species. However, precise information about the interaction between gulls and other vertebrates, particularly with lizards is still scarce. The Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi, shares several coastal islets with the yellow-legged gull. Using two different sources of information, we studied the interaction of both species in Colom Island (Menorca, Balearic Islands, Spain). We studied the diet of the yellow-legged gull and learnt that the Balearic lizard is not a common prey of the yellow-legged gull. On the other hand, we studied the potential predation pressure of gulls on lizards, using plasticine models of lizards. We did two different experiments from which we can conclude that yellow-legged gulls rarely attack lizards and, consequently, cannot be considered a major threat for this endemic lizard species, at least in the population under study. Finally, we obtained evidence that plasticine models can only be employed with caution to assess predation pressure of opportunistic scavengers, much as gulls are. The majority of marks on models were not the consequence of true attacks by gulls, but the result of ground exploratory behaviour of gulls in search of any edible matter. Therefore, contrary to popular belief, in the case of the yellow-legged gull, the proportion of marked models would be an indication of ground-based wandering activity, rather than a result of its predation pressure on lizards.


2008 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raül Ramos ◽  
Francisco Ramírez ◽  
Carolina Sanpera ◽  
Lluís Jover ◽  
Xavier Ruiz

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 171743 ◽  
Author(s):  
José C. Noguera ◽  
Manuel Aira ◽  
Marcos Pérez-Losada ◽  
Jorge Domínguez ◽  
Alberto Velando

It has recently been hypothesized that stress exposure (e.g. via glucocorticoid secretion) may dysregulate the bacterial gut microbiome, a crucial ‘organ' in animal health. However, whether stress exposure (e.g. via glucocorticoid secretion) affects the bacterial gut microbiome of natural populations is unknown. We have experimentally altered the basal glucocorticoid level (corticosterone implants) in a wild avian species, the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis , to assess its effects on the gastrointestinal microbiota. Our results suggest underrepresentation of several microbial taxa in the corticosterone-implanted birds. Importantly, such reduction included potentially pathogenic avian bacteria (e.g. Mycoplasma and Microvirga ) and also some commensal taxa that may be beneficial for birds (e.g. Firmicutes). Our findings clearly demonstrate a close link between microbiome communities and glucocorticoid levels in natural populations. Furthermore, they suggest a beneficial effect of stress in reducing the risk of infection that should be explored in future studies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Marko Tucakov ◽  
Milan Vogrin

Presence and correlation between the numbers of Black-headed and Yellow-legged Gull was studies between 1998 and 2004 on Kolut fishponds in NW Serbia. Both species occurred there from February to December. Spring migration culminated in late February and early March. The period of the most intensive autumn concentration was from October to December. The difference between the numbers in all months as well as between the numbers in spring and in autumn was statistically significant. The period of the most intensive autumn passage of Yellow-legged Gull was from late October to early December. The difference between the numbers between the months was not statistically significant. A high concentration of both species in autumn and early winter was explained by high food availability during fish harvest when ponds were empty. Positive correlation between the numbers of two species thru the year indicated attractiveness of large flocks of Black-headed Gulls for Yellow-legged Gulls. This is especially true for the autumn period, when feeding niches and food is easily accessible. Correlation between the numbers of two species was negative in spring, when accesibility of aquatic animals is lower and large flocks of Black-headed Gulls are lacking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document