PCV26 Quality of Life Improves More for People Who Receive Proactive Absolute Cardiac Risk Management in a Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic Compared to Usual Care

Abstract Backround Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are common in the ageing population and affect the health related quality of life. Health care resources are limited and the continuity of care has to be assured. Therefore it is essential to find demonstrable tools for best treatment practices for patients with chronic diseases. Our aim was to study the influence of a participatory patient care plan on the health-related quality of life and disease specific outcomes related to diabetes, ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Methods The data of the present study were based on the Participatory Patient Care Planning in Primary Care. A total of 605 patients were recruited in the Siilinjärvi Health Center in the years 2017–2018 from those patients who were followed up due to the treatment of hypertension, ischemic heart disease or diabetes. Patients were randomized into usual care and intervention groups. The intervention consisted of a participatory patient care plan, which was formulated in collaboration with the patient and the nurse and the physician during the first health care visit. Health-related quality of life with the 15D instrument and the disease-specific outcomes of body mass index (BMI), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) and blood pressure were assessed at the baseline and after a one-year follow-up. Results A total of 587 patients with a mean age of 69 years were followed for 12 months. In the intervention group there were 289 patients (54% women) and in the usual care group there were 298 patients (50% women). During the follow-up there were no significant changes between the groups in health-related quality and disease-specific outcomes. Conclusions During the 12-month follow-up, no significant differences between the intervention and the usual care groups were detected, as the intervention and the usual care groups were already in good therapeutic equilibrium at the baseline. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02992431. Registered 14/12/2016

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BMC Geriatrics ◽

10.1186/s12877-021-02319-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Zhongyi Chen ◽

Zhaosheng Ding ◽

Caixia Chen ◽

Yangfan Sun ◽

Yuyu Jiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Usual Care ◽

Caregiver Burden ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Subgroup Analyses ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. Results A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.21; P = 0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age > 80 years and at follow-up ≤3 months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI = − 0.97 to − 0.15, P = 0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Conclusions CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.

Download Full-text

Evaluating the provision of Further Enabling Care at Home (FECH+) for informal caregivers of older adults discharged home from hospital: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046600 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. e046600

Author(s):

Anne-Marie Hill ◽

Rachael Moorin ◽

Susan Slatyer ◽

Christina Bryant ◽

Keith Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Older Adults ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Usual Care ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Informal Caregivers ◽

Care Recipient ◽

Care At Home ◽

Randomised Controlled

IntroductionThere are personal and societal benefits from caregiving; however, caregiving can jeopardise caregivers’ health. The Further Enabling Care at Home (FECH+) programme provides structured nurse support, through telephone outreach, to informal caregivers of older adults following discharge from acute hospital care to home. The trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the FECH+ programme on caregivers’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after care recipients’ hospital discharge.Methods and analysisA multisite, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with blinded baseline and outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis, adhering to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines will be conducted. Participants (N=925 dyads) comprising informal home caregiver (18 years or older) and care recipient (70 years or older) will be recruited when the care recipient is discharged from hospital. Caregivers of patients discharged from wards in three hospitals in Australia (one in Western Australia and two in Queensland) are eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The intervention group receive the FECH+ programme, which provides structured support and problem-solving for the caregiver after the care recipient’s discharge, in addition to usual care. The control group receives usual care. The programme is delivered by a registered nurse and comprises six 30–45 min telephone support sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome is caregivers’ HRQOL measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life—eight dimensions. Secondary outcomes include caregiver preparedness, strain and distress and use of healthcare services. Changes in HRQOL between groups will be compared using a mixed regression model that accounts for the correlation between repeated measurements.Ethics and disseminationParticipants will provide written informed consent. Ethics approvals have been obtained from Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group, Curtin University, Griffith University, Gold Coast Health Service and government health data linkage services. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12620000060943.

Download Full-text

S1258 What Are the Implications of Newly Identified Celiac Disease in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus? Effect Upon Glycaemic Control, Quality of Life, Cardiac Risk Factors and Peripheral Nerve Function

Gastroenterology ◽

10.1016/s0016-5085(08)60980-4 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 134 (4) ◽

pp. A-212-A-212

Author(s):

J LEEDS ◽

M HADJIVASSILIOU ◽

S TESFAYE ◽

D SANDERS

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Type 1 Diabetes ◽

Celiac Disease ◽

Cardiac Risk ◽

Nerve Function ◽

Peripheral Nerve Function

Download Full-text

Abstract P322: Health Status of Stable Patients With Obstructive or Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Healthy Controls

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/circoutcomes.4.suppl_1.ap322 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Rosanna Tavella ◽

Natalie Cutri ◽

John F Beltrame

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Coronary Artery Disease ◽

Chest Pain ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽

Summary Score ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Artery Disease

BACKGROUND. Patients with chest pain and no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography (NoCAD) are frequently considered not to have significant pathology and their symptoms trivialized. This study compared the health status of patients with NoCAD, obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and healthy subjects. METHOD. Patients undergoing angiography within the preceding 12 months for the investigation of chest pain were categorized as NoCAD or CAD on the basis of the angiographic findings and completed a health-related quality of life instrument, the Short Form-36 (SF-36). These were compared with a ‘healthy control’ group that were randomly selected from the electronic white pages and recruited if they had no self-reported history of cardiovascular disease. Cross sectional comparisons between the three groups were age adjusted and performed using liner regression. RESULTS. As shown in the table below, the healthy controls were significantly younger and therefore comparison of SF36 scores were age adjusted. All SF-36 sub-scales (except for bodily pain) and summary scores (see table ), were significantly lower in the CAD and NoCAD groups compared to the healthy controls. There were no differences in SF-36 scores between NoCAD and CAD. CONCLUSION. Compared with a healthy population, patients with stable CAD and NoCAD have significantly poorer quality of life asF-36. Future management strategies need to address the health outcomes in these patients. Healthy Controls (n = 3168) NoCAD (n = 320) CAD (n = 828) Age 52 ± 15 57 ± 12 * 62 ± 11 # SF-36: Physical Summary Score 49 ± 10 41 ± 11 * 41 ± 11 # SF-36: Mental Summary Score 51 ± 10 46 ± 11 * 46 ± 11 # * p <0.01 for healthy controls vs NoCAD, # p <0.01 for healthy controls vs CAD

Download Full-text

Abstract 2450: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Low Dose Hormone Therapy on Myocardial Ischemia in Postmenopausal Women with No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease:Results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.116.suppl_16.ii_539 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽

Author(s):

C. Bairey Merz ◽

Marian Olson ◽

Candace McClure ◽

James Symons ◽

George Sopko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Chest Pain ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

Endothelial Dysfunction ◽

Myocardial Ischemia ◽

Hormone Therapy ◽

Postmenopausal Women ◽

Brachial Artery ◽

Low Dose

Background: Compared with men, women have more evidence of myocardial ischemia in the setting of no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). While low endogenous estrogen levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction, the role of low dose hormone therapy has not been fully evaluated in women suffering from myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD. Objective: This WISE ancillary trial evaluated the effect of low dose hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD on: endothelial dysfunction, assessed by brachial artery reactivity, physical functional disability assessed by exercise testing, and quality of life assessed by cardiac symptoms and psychological questionnaires. Methods: Using a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled design, seventy-four participants with normal/minimally diseased epicardial coronary arteries (<50% luminal diameter stenosis) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were planned to be randomized to receive either 1 mg norethindrone/10 mcg ethinyl estradiol (1/10 NA/EE) or placebo for twelve weeks. Baseline and exit brachial artery reactivity (BART), exercise stress testing, WISE psychosocial questionnaires, SF-36, blood lipids and hormone levels were evaluated. Results: Recruitment was closed prematurely due to failure to recruit in the year following publication of the Women’s Health Initiative hormone trial results. Of the 37 women randomized, 35 completed the study. While there was no difference in the frequency of chest pain between groups at the baseline visit, at study exit there was less frequent chest pain in the 1/10 NA/EE group compared to the placebo group (p=0.02). Women taking 1/10 NA/EE also showed a trend to improved BART and exercise tolerance, and had significantly fewer hot flashes/night sweats (p=0.003), less avoidance of intimacy (p=0.05), and borderline differences in sexual desire and vaginal dryness (p=0.06). Conclusion: Among postmenopausal women with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD, hormone therapy with 1/10 NA/EE is associated with reduced chest pain symptoms, menopausal symptoms and improved quality of life with trends for improved endothelial function and exercise performance.

Download Full-text