scholarly journals Loss of Local Tumor Control After Index Surgery for Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. e8-e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Depreitere ◽  
Federico Ricciardi ◽  
Mark Arts ◽  
Laurent Balabaud ◽  
Jacob Maciej Buchowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor

scholarly journals Single-session and multisession CyberKnife radiosurgery for spine metastases—University of Pittsburgh and Georgetown University experience

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight E. Heron ◽  
Malolan S. Rajagopalan ◽  
Brandon Stone ◽  
Steven Burton ◽  
Peter C. Gerszten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Cyberknife Radiosurgery

Object The authors compared the effectiveness of single-session (SS) and multisession (MS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of spinal metastases. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of 348 lesions in 228 patients treated with the CyberKnife radiosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Georgetown University Medical Center. One hundred ninety-five lesions were treated using an SS treatment regimen (mean 16.3 Gy), whereas 153 lesions were treated using an MS approach (mean 20.6 Gy in 3 fractions, 23.8 Gy in 4 fractions, and 24.5 Gy in 5 fractions). The primary end point was pain control. Secondary end points included neurological deficit improvement, toxicity, local tumor control, need for retreatment, and overall survival. Results Pain control was significantly improved in the SS group (SSG) for all measured time points up to 1 year posttreatment (100% vs 88%, p = 0.003). Rates of toxicity and neurological deficit improvement were not statistically different. Local tumor control was significantly better in the MS group (MSG) up to 2 years posttreatment (96% vs 70%, p = 0.001). Similarly, the need for retreatment was significantly lower in the MSG (1% vs 13%, p < 0.001). One-year overall survival was significantly greater in the MSG than the SSG (63% vs 46%, p = 0.002). Conclusions Single-session and MS SRS regimens are both effective in the treatment of spinal metastases. While an SS approach provides greater early pain control and equivalent toxicity, an MS approach achieves greater tumor control and less need for retreatment in long-term survivors.

scholarly journals Local disease control for spinal metastases following “separation surgery” and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Laufer ◽  
J. Bryan Iorgulescu ◽  
Talia Chapman ◽  
Eric Lis ◽  
Weiji Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Single Fraction ◽  
Tumor Histology ◽  
Local Progression

Object Decompression surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective therapy for preservation or recovery of neurological function and achieving durable local disease control in patients suffering from metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). The authors examine the outcomes of postoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivered as single-fraction or hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for achieving long-term local tumor control. Methods A retrospective chart review identified 186 patients with ESCC from spinal metastases who were treated with surgical decompression, instrumentation, and postoperative radiation delivered as either single-fraction SRS (24 Gy) in 40 patients (21.5%), high-dose hypofractionated SRS (24–30 Gy in 3 fractions) in 37 patients (19.9%), or low-dose hypofractionated SRS (18–36 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions) in 109 patients (58.6%). The relationships between postoperative adjuvant SRS dosing and fractionation, patient characteristics, tumor histology–specific radiosensitivity, grade of ESCC, extent of surgical decompression, response to preoperative radiotherapy, and local tumor control were evaluated by competing risks analysis. Results The total cumulative incidence of local progression was 16.4% 1 year after SRS. Multivariate Gray competing risks analysis revealed a significant improvement in local control with high-dose hypofractionated SRS (4.1% cumulative incidence of local progression at 1 year, HR 0.12, p = 0.04) as compared with low-dose hypofractionated SRS (22.6% local progression at 1 year, HR 1). Although univariate analysis demonstrated a trend toward greater risk of local progression for patients in whom preoperative conventional external beam radiation therapy failed (22.2% local progression at 1 year, HR 1.96, p = 0.07) compared with patients who did not receive any preoperative radiotherapy (11.2% local progression at 1 year, HR 1), this association was not confirmed with multivariate analysis. No other variable significantly correlated with progression-free survival, including radiation sensitivity of tumor histology, grade of ESCC, extent of surgical decompression, or patient sex. Conclusions Postoperative adjuvant SRS following epidural spinal cord decompression and instrumentation is a safe and effective strategy for establishing durable local tumor control regardless of tumor histology–specific radiosensitivity. Patients who received high-dose hypofractionated SRS demonstrated 1-year local progression rates of less than 5% (95% CI 0%–12.2%), which were superior to the results of low-dose hypofractionated SRS. The local progression rate after single-fraction SRS was less than 10% (95% CI 0%–19.0%).

scholarly journals The Role of a Navigational Radiofrequency Ablation Device and Concurrent Vertebral Augmentation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Reach Spinal Metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 4004-4015
Author(s):  
Claudio Pusceddu ◽  
Davide De Francesco ◽  
Luca Melis ◽  
Nicola Ballicu ◽  
Alessandro Fancellu
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Vertebral Augmentation ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Metastatic Lesions ◽  
The Mean

Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a navigational radiofrequency ablation device with concurrent vertebral augmentation in the treatment of posterior vertebral body metastatic lesions, which are technically difficult to access. Primary outcomes of the study were evaluation of pain palliation and radiologic assessment of local tumor control. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients with 41 vertebral spinal metastases involving the posterior vertebral body underwent computed tomography-guided percutaneous targeted radiofrequency ablation, with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device, associated with vertebral augmentation. Twenty-one patients (60%) had 1 or 2 metastatic lesions (Group A) and fourteen (40%) patients had multiple (>2) vertebral lesions (Group B). Changes in pain severity were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Metastatic lesions were evaluated in terms of radiological local control. Results: The procedure was technically successful in all the treated vertebrae. Among the symptomatic patients, the mean VAS score dropped from 5.7 (95% CI 4.9–6.5) before tRFA and to 0.9 (95% CI 0.4–1.3) after tRFA (p < 0.001). The mean decrease in VAS score between baseline and one week follow up was 4.8 (95% CI 4.2–5.4). VAS decrease over time between one week and one year following radiofrequency ablation was similar, suggesting that pain relief was immediate and durable. Neither patients with 1–2 vertebral metastases, nor those with multiple lesions, showed radiological signs of local progression or recurrence of the tumor in the index vertebrae during a median follow up of 19 months (4–46 months) and 10 months (4–37 months), respectively. Conclusion: Treatment of spinal metastases with a navigational radiofrequency ablation device and vertebral augmentation can be used to obtain local tumor control with immediate and durable pain relief, providing effective treatment in the multimodality management of difficult-to-reach spinal metastases.

Quality of life and cost-utility of surgical treatment for patients with spinal metastases: prospective cohort study

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1265-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Miyazaki ◽  
Kenichiro Kakutani ◽  
Yoshitada Sakai ◽  
Yasuo Ejima ◽  
Koichiro Maeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Cost Utility

Patient outcomes and tumor control in single-fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Christine Park ◽  
Elizabeth P. Howell ◽  
Vikram A. Mehta ◽  
Luis Ramirez ◽  
Meghan J. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Single Fraction ◽  
Median Total Dose

OBJECTIVEStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers efficient, noninvasive treatment of spinal neoplasms. Single-fraction (SF) high-dose SBRT has a relatively narrow therapeutic window, while hypofractionated delivery of SBRT may have an improved safety profile with similar efficacy. Because the optimal approach of delivery is unknown, the authors examined whether hypofractionated SBRT improves pain and/or functional outcomes and results in better tumor control compared with SF-SBRT.METHODSThis is a single-institution retrospective study of adult patients with spinal metastases treated with SF- or three-fraction (3F) SBRT from 2008 to 2019. Demographics and baseline characteristics, radiographic data, and posttreatment outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 3 months are reported.RESULTSOf the 156 patients included in the study, 70 (44.9%) underwent SF-SBRT (median total dose 1700 cGy) and 86 (55.1%) underwent 3F-SBRT (median total dose 2100 cGy). At baseline, a higher proportion of patients in the 3F-SBRT group had a worse baseline profile, including severity of pain (p < 0.05), average use of pain medication (p < 0.001), and functional scores (p < 0.05) compared with the SF-SBRT cohort. At the 3-month follow-up, the 3F-SBRT cohort experienced a greater frequency of improvement in pain compared with the SF-SBRT group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients treated with 3F-SBRT demonstrated a higher frequency of improved Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores (p < 0.05) compared with those treated with SF-SBRT, with no significant difference in the frequency of improvement in modified Rankin Scale scores. Local tumor control did not differ significantly between the two cohorts.CONCLUSIONSPatients who received spinal 3F-SBRT more frequently achieved significant pain relief and an increased frequency of improvement in KPS compared with those treated with SF-SBRT. Local tumor control was similar in the two groups. Future work is needed to establish the relationship between fractionation schedule and clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document