Neuromodulation, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Spinal Cord Stimulation on YouTube: A Content-Quality Analysis of Search Terms

Author(s):  
Max Ward ◽  
Mickey E. Abraham ◽  
Caitlin Craft-Hacherl ◽  
Alexis Nicheporuck ◽  
Britanny Ward ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene E Harmsen ◽  
Darrin J Lee ◽  
Robert F Dallapiazza ◽  
Philippe De Vloo ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Stimulation frequency has been considered a crucial determinant of efficacy in deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS at frequencies over 250 Hz is not currently employed and consensus in the field suggests that higher frequencies are not clinically effective. With the recent demonstration of clinically effective ultrahigh frequency (UHF) spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz we tested whether UHF stimulation could also be clinically useful in movement disorder patients with DBS. We evaluated the clinical effects and safety of UHF DBS in patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) or ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) DBS. METHODS We studied the effects of conventional (130 Hz) and UHF stimulation in 5 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with STN DBS and in one patient with essential tremor (ET) with VIM DBS. We compared the clinical benefit and adverse effects of stimulation at various amplitudes either intraoperatively or postoperatively with the electrodes externalized. RESULTS Motor performance improved in all 6 patients with UHF DBS. About 10 kHz stimulation at amplitudes = 3.0 mA appeared to be as effective as 130 Hz in improving motor symptoms (46.2% vs 53.5% motor score reduction, P = .110, N = 90 trials). Interestingly, 10 kHz stimulation resulted in fewer stimulation-induced paresthesiae and speech adverse effects than 130 Hz stimulation. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that DBS at 10 kHz produces clinical benefits in patients with movement disorders. Like 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation, 10 kHz DBS has the potential to produce clinical benefits while possibly reducing stimulation-induced adverse effects. Further studies will be required to optimize UHF DBS stimulation parameters and to determine its clinical utility.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Pinto de Souza ◽  
Clement Hamani ◽  
Carolina Oliveira Souza ◽  
William Omar Lopez Contreras ◽  
Maria Gabriela dos Santos Ghilardi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (3-4) ◽  
pp. S30.e1-S30.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamitsu Yamamoto ◽  
Yoichi Katayama ◽  
Toshiki Obuchi ◽  
Kazutaka Kobayashi ◽  
Hideki Oshima ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 246-260
Author(s):  
Giovanna Zambo Galafassi ◽  
Pedro Henrique Simm Pires de Aguiar ◽  
Renata Faria Simm ◽  
Paulo Roberto Franceschini ◽  
Marco Prist Filho ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 804-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Lin Chiang ◽  
Yi-Cheng Tai ◽  
Jacqueline McMaster ◽  
Victor SC Fung ◽  
Neil Mahant

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 009-014
Author(s):  
Farrell Sarah Marie ◽  
Aziz Tipu

For the millions of patients experiencing chronic pain despite pharmacotherapy, deep brain stimulation (DBS) provides a beacon of hope. Over the past decade the field has shifted away from DBS towards other forms of neuromodulation, particularly spinal cord stimulation (SCS). DBS for pain is still performed, albeit off-label in US and UK, and experiences variable success rates. SCS is an extremely useful tool for the modulation of pain but is limited in its application to specific pain aetiologies. We advocate use of DBS for pain, for patients for whom pharmacology has failed and for whom spinal cord stimulation is inadequate. DBS for chronic pain is at risk of premature neglect. Here we outline how this has come to pass, and in the process argue for the untapped potential for this procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
Rachel Kallus ◽  
Lauren Bangert ◽  
Elana Farace

Abstract Objective We completed a case study to investigate whether there are cognitive changes after Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery in the treatment of refractory Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (OCD) as an initiation of a quality analysis due to increased referrals for this procedure at our institution. Method We evaluated a 21-year-old male before and after bilateral nucleus accumbens DBS placement for OCD. His pre-operative neurosurgery evaluation and brain imaging were unremarkable. Post-operative imaging revealed stable changes of bilateral DBS lead placement. Pre and post-operative neuropsychological testing included measures of mental status, language, memory, attention, and executive functioning. Results A reliable change estimate was obtained for each test. There was no significant change in performance on the Mini-Mental State Exam, Boston Naming Test, Logical Memory I/II, Faces I, Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT) immediate and delayed recall, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64, Trail Making Tests A & B, Letter Fluency, Animal Fluency, and Stroop Color and Word Test (Stroop) color and color-word condition. There was significant decline for all California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition trials (trials 1–5, short delay recall, and long delay recall) and RCFT recognition. There was significant improvement for the Stroop word condition. Conclusions. Given mixed findings, it is unclear the extent to which DBS impacted this patient’s overall cognitive functioning. Meanwhile, he showed improvement in OCD symptoms, to the degree that he could live alone, maintain employment, and independently manage daily activities. There is need for future studies to examine the cognitive effects of DBS for OCD, with larger samples and a control group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. e294-e303
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Lina Jia ◽  
Xiaobo Wu ◽  
Zuoli Sun ◽  
Zheng Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document