scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of Publications From 2011–2020 in 6 Major Neurosurgical Journals (Part 1): Geographic, Demographic, and Article Type Trends

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanwaljeet Garg ◽  
Bipin Chaurasia ◽  
Andrew J. Gienapp ◽  
Bruno Splavski ◽  
Kenan I. Arnautovic
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Article Type

scholarly journals The 100 most influential articles in myopia: a bibliometric analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
Xue-Jiao Wang ◽  
◽  
Yang Jiang ◽  
Yu-Yu Chou ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Development Trend ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Research Focus ◽  
Review Articles ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Visual Science ◽  
Eligible Article ◽  
The Mean

AIM: To identify and characterize the 100 most influential articles in the field of myopia over the last decades. METHODS: Articles on myopia published between January 1975 and March 2020 were searched through the Web of Science Core Collection database. Two independent authors reviewed and determined the 100 most cited articles. The characteristics of each eligible article were recorded, including authors, institutions, countries, journals, publication date, total citations (TCs), annual citations (ACs), research focus and article type. RESULTS: The top 100 most influential articles were published between 1983 and 2016, with 1999 as the most prolific year. The mean number of TCs was 288 (range: 193-537) and the mean number of ACs was 19 (range: 7-109). Treatment and epidemiology of myopia were the most important research focus. These articles were published in 21 journals led by Ophthalmology (29%) followed by Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (23%). The number of ACs for articles published in the last ten years was significantly higher than that for the other most-cited articles (44 vs 16, Mann-Whitney U test P<0.01). There is no difference in the number of TCs between original articles and review articles, while the number of ACs for review articles was significantly higher than that for original articles (22 vs 17, Mann-Whitney U test P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis can provide us with concise information about the development trend of research in the field of myopia in the past few decades, and provide an important reference for researchers to guide future research.

scholarly journals COVID-19, who published what: An early bibliometric analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Chehab ◽  
Hamed Hammoud ◽  
Mohamad Alchawa
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The World ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Background: The emergence of a novel coronavirus, known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), has spread fear across the globe. As nations around the world mobilize significant resources to combat the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have sought to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the disease. Objective: This study aimed to map the COVID-19 research productivity based on articles indexed in PubMed and ScienceDirect. Methods: The articles related to COVID-19 dated from December 2019 to December 2020 were retrieved from both databases. The articles were classified into categories according to their type and theme. Results: Publication outputs were assessed. A total of 518 articles were included for analysis. They were published in 182 journals, The Lancet is the most productive (41 articles; 9.1%). China (53.7%), USA(10.4%), and the UK (8.7%) were the most productive countries in terms of COVID-19 research. The most common type of research was commentary (21.8%) and the most frequent theme was awareness (30.3%). The median impact factor for the publishing journals was 3.717, with a statistically significant difference in the impact factor based on the article type, theme, and language. Conclusion: The findings of this first bibliometric study on COVID-19 suggest that there is a need for international collaboration and further research on the management of the disease.

scholarly journals Hundred Most Cited Articles in Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder: A Bibliometric Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinning Mi ◽  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Ning Yang ◽  
Yongzheng Han ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Science Studies ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorder ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background: In line with aging populations and increased application of anesthesia and surgery, perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) has received growing attention worldwide. Considerable research into PND is being conducted; however, the quantity and quality of such research have not been reported. Through a retrospective bibliometric analysis, this study aimed to identify and characterize the top 100 cited publications on PND. Methods: We searched the Web of Science database to find the top 100 cited articles focusing on PND. We collected bibliographic information, including year of publication, country of origin, article type, published journal, citation count, and authorship. To determine changes with time, we compared older and newer articles. Results: The top 100 cited articles were published between 1955 and 2016; the number of citations ranged from 111 to 1248. The United States had the most published papers; clinical trials were the most common article type. The specialty journals of Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia were the two most cited journals. Newer papers had a comparable number of citations to older articles, but the former had higher citation rates, greater funding disclosures, more focus on basic research, and more open access publications. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the most cited articles and highlights the increasing attention on PND. High-quality clinical trials with a greater journal impact factor received more citations. However, there has been growth in the number of basic science studies as an area of research with respect to the pathogenesis of PND.

scholarly journals Hundred most cited articles in perioperative neurocognitive disorder: a bibliometric analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinning Mi ◽  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Ning Yang ◽  
Yongzheng Han ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Science Studies ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorder ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Aging Populations ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background In line with aging populations and increased application of anesthesia and surgery, perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) has received growing attention worldwide. Considerable researches into PND are being conducted; however, the quantity and quality of such researches have not been reported. Through a retrospective bibliometric analysis, this study aims to identify and characterize the top 100 cited publications on PND. Methods We searched the Web of Science database to find the top 100 cited articles focusing on PND. We collected bibliographic information, including year of publication, country of origin, article type, published journal, citation count, and authorship. To determine changes with time, we compared older and newest articles. Results The top 100 cited articles were published between 1955 and 2016; the number of citations ranged from 111 to 1248. The United States had the most published papers; clinical trial was the most common article type. The specialty journals of Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia were the two most cited journals. Newest articles had a comparable number of citations to older articles, but the former had higher annual citation rates, greater funding disclosures, more focus on basic research, and more open access publications. Conclusions This study provides a comprehensive overview of the most cited articles and highlights the increasing attention on PND. High-quality clinical trials with a greater journal impact factor receive more citations. However, there has been a growth in the number of basic science studies as an area of research with respect to the pathogenesis of PND.

Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science–Indexed Papers on Concrete Segmental Bridges

PCI Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José R. Martí-Vargas ◽  
Emili García-Taengua ◽  
W. Micah Hale ◽  
Mohamed K. ElBatanouny ◽  
Paul H. Ziehl
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Segmental Bridges

The integrated interventional radiology match: a bibliometric analysis of matched first-year residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Chandra ◽  
Neil Jain ◽  
Pratik Shukla ◽  
Ethan Wajswol ◽  
Sohail Contractor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Index Number ◽  
Research Information ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Journal Impact

Objectives: The integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency has only been established relatively recently as compared to other specialties. Although some preliminary information is available based on survey data five, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis documenting the importance of the quantity and quality of research in applying to an integrated-IR program currently exists. As the first bibliometric analysis of matched IR residents, the data obtained from this study fills a gap in the literature. Materials and Methods: A list of matched residents from the 2018 integrated-IR match were identified by contacting program directors. The Scopus database was used to search for resident research information, including total publications, first-author publications, radiology-related publications, and h-indices. Each matriculating program was categorized into one of five tiers based on the average faculty Hirsch index (h-index). Results: Sixty-three programs and 117 matched residents were identified and reviewed on the Scopus database. For the 2018 cycle, 274 total publications were produced by matched applicants, with a mean of 2.34 ± 0.41 publication per matched applicant. The average h-index for matched applicants was 0.96 ± 0.13. On univariate analysis, the number of radiology-related publications, highest journal impact factor, and h-index were all associated with an increased likelihood of matching into a higher tier program (P < 0.05). Other research variables displayed no statistical significance. All applicants with PhDs matched into tier one programs. Conclusions: Research serves as an important element in successfully matching into an integrated-IR residency. h-index, number of radiology-related manuscripts, and highest journal impact factors are all positively associated with matching into a higher tier program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document