The integrated interventional radiology match: a bibliometric analysis of matched first-year residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Chandra ◽  
Neil Jain ◽  
Pratik Shukla ◽  
Ethan Wajswol ◽  
Sohail Contractor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Index Number ◽  
Research Information ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Journal Impact

Objectives: The integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency has only been established relatively recently as compared to other specialties. Although some preliminary information is available based on survey data five, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis documenting the importance of the quantity and quality of research in applying to an integrated-IR program currently exists. As the first bibliometric analysis of matched IR residents, the data obtained from this study fills a gap in the literature. Materials and Methods: A list of matched residents from the 2018 integrated-IR match were identified by contacting program directors. The Scopus database was used to search for resident research information, including total publications, first-author publications, radiology-related publications, and h-indices. Each matriculating program was categorized into one of five tiers based on the average faculty Hirsch index (h-index). Results: Sixty-three programs and 117 matched residents were identified and reviewed on the Scopus database. For the 2018 cycle, 274 total publications were produced by matched applicants, with a mean of 2.34 ± 0.41 publication per matched applicant. The average h-index for matched applicants was 0.96 ± 0.13. On univariate analysis, the number of radiology-related publications, highest journal impact factor, and h-index were all associated with an increased likelihood of matching into a higher tier program (P < 0.05). Other research variables displayed no statistical significance. All applicants with PhDs matched into tier one programs. Conclusions: Research serves as an important element in successfully matching into an integrated-IR residency. h-index, number of radiology-related manuscripts, and highest journal impact factors are all positively associated with matching into a higher tier program.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Neurosurgical Practice Guidelines

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 605-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob R Lepard ◽  
Beverly C Walters
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Bibliometric Data ◽  
Citation Data ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Comprehensive Framework

Abstract BACKGROUND In the last 20 yr, the rate of neurosurgical guideline publication has increased. However, despite the higher volume and increasing emphasis on quality there remains no reliable means of measuring the overall impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). OBJECTIVE To utilize citation analysis to evaluate the dispersion of neurosurgical CPGs. METHODS A list of neurosurgical guidelines was compiled by performing electronic searches using the Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases. The Scopus database was queried to obtain current publication and citation data for all included documents and categorized based upon recognized neurosurgical specialties. The h-index, R-index, h2-index, i10-index, and dissemination index (D-Index) were manually calculated for each subspecialty. RESULTS After applying screening criteria the search yielded 372 neurosurgical CPGs, which were included for bibliometric analysis. The overall calculated h-index for neurosurgery was 56. When broken down by subspecialty trauma/critical care had the highest value at 35, followed by spine and peripheral nerve at 30, cerebrovascular at 28, tumor at 16, pediatrics at 14, miscellaneous at 11, and functional/stereotactic/pain at 6. Cerebrovascular neurosurgery was noted to have the highest D-Index at 3.4. CONCLUSION A comprehensive framework is useful for guideline impact analysis. Bibliometric data provides a novel and adequate means of evaluating the successful dissemination of neurosurgical guidelines. There remains a paucity of data regarding implementation and clinical outcomes of individual guidelines.

scholarly journals Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia

2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1916) ◽  
pp. 20192047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin A. Chapman ◽  
Júlio César Bicca-Marques ◽  
Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer ◽  
Pengfei Fan ◽  
Peter J. Fashing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Incentive Structure ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Positive Direction ◽  
H Index ◽  
Cultural Perspectives ◽  
Mentoring Practices ◽  
Publication Number ◽  
Journal Impact

Research is a highly competitive profession where evaluation plays a central role; journals are ranked and individuals are evaluated based on their publication number, the number of times they are cited and their h -index. Yet such evaluations are often done in inappropriate ways that are damaging to individual careers, particularly for young scholars, and to the profession. Furthermore, as with all indices, people can play games to better their scores. This has resulted in the incentive structure of science increasingly mimicking economic principles, but rather than a monetary gain, the incentive is a higher score. To ensure a diversity of cultural perspectives and individual experiences, we gathered a team of academics in the fields of ecology and evolution from around the world and at different career stages. We first examine how authorship, h -index of individuals and journal impact factors are being used and abused. Second, we speculate on the consequences of the continued use of these metrics with the hope of sparking discussions that will help our fields move in a positive direction. We would like to see changes in the incentive systems, rewarding quality research and guaranteeing transparency. Senior faculty should establish the ethical standards, mentoring practices and institutional evaluation criteria to create the needed changes.

scholarly journals Bibliometric Study of Family Studies Journals Using Journal Impact Factors, CiteScore and H-index

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Zao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Family Studies ◽  
Bibliometric Study ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Citation Data ◽  
H Index ◽  
Journal Citation Reports ◽  
Journal Impact ◽  
Bibliometric Studies ◽  
Representative Family

Although there are bibliometric studies of journals in various fields, the field of family studies remains unexplored. Using the bibliometric metrics of the two-year and five-year Journal Impact Factors, the H-index, and the newly revised CiteScore, this paper examines the relationships among these metrics in a bibliometric study of forty-four representative family studies journals. The citation data were drawn from Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The correlation analysis found strong positive relationships on the metrics. Despite the strong correlations, discrepancies in rank orders of the journals were found. A possible explanation of noticeable discrepancy in rankings was provided, and the implications of the study for stakeholders were discussed.

scholarly journals High impact journals in ecology cover proportionally more statistically significant findings

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Ceausu ◽  
Luís Borda-de-Água ◽  
Thomas Merckx ◽  
Esther Sossai ◽  
Manuel Sapage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Research Synthesis ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Ecological Research ◽  
Ecological Data ◽  
P Values ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Journal Impact

AbstractUnbiased scientific reporting is crucial for data and research synthesis. Previous studies suggest that statistically significant results are more likely to be published and more likely to be submitted to high impact journals. However, the most recent research on statistical significance in relation to journal impact factors in ecological research was published more than two decades ago or addressed a small subset of the literature. Here, we extract p-values from all articles published in 11 journals in 2012 and 2014 across a wide range of impact factors with six journals sampled in both years. Our results indicate that the proportion of statistically significant results increases with rising impact factor. Such a trend can have important consequences for syntheses of ecological data and it highlights the importance of covering a wide range of impact factors when identifying published studies for data syntheses. This trend can also lead to a biased understanding of the probability of true effects in ecology and conservation. We caution against the possible downplaying of non-significant results by either journals or authors.

Evaluation of halal tourism in terms of bibliometric characteristics

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1601-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yenal Yagmur ◽  
Rüya Ehtiyar ◽  
Akin Aksu
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Index Number ◽  
H Index ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research Fields ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations

Purpose The growing competition between the developing halal market and the countries in halal market has enhanced the interest of researchers in this field in recent years. In this context, this study aims to examine the studies published in the international literature on halal tourism between 1975 and 2019 in terms of bibliometric characteristics and to reveal tendencies and trends of these publications within the framework of certain parameters. Design/methodology/approach In accordance with this purpose, the topic of “halal tourism” was searched in the database of “Web of Science Core Collection,” and bibliometrics data in regard to the publications were reached. Publications on halal tourism were examined in the context of years, numbers, genres, research fields, fields of study, journals in which they are found, the number of authors and page number of publications, research approaches of publications, themes of publications, country where the research data was collected (examined), names of the authors in the publications and publication numbers of the authors, and the number of citations. Findings In this paper, it was determined that the studies in the field of halal tourism increased in recent years. It was concluded that these studies were mainly carried out after 2011 and showed a large increase in 2016, the majority of the publications were in the form of study-paper and the average number of citations in the field was 3.1, and h-index number was seven. Research limitations/implications This paper is based on bibliometric analysis. Bibliometric analyses were performed on the “Web of Science Core Collection.” Because of database searches were made only on “Web of Science Core Collection,” the publications that were not scanned here could not be analyzed. Originality/value This paper examined the studies on halal tourism between 1975 and 2019 with a bibliometric analysis technique. Thus, it is aimed to learn more about halal tourism and to provide the researchers who work in this field with information about the structure of this field.

scholarly journals Academic sell-out: How an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia

2016 ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Thorsten Gruber
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Academic Impact ◽  
H Index ◽  
Journal Rankings ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Citation Counts ◽  
Journal Impact

Increasingly, academics have to demonstrate that their research has academic impact. Universities normally use journal rankings and journal impact factors to assess the research impact of individual academics. More recently, citation counts for individual articles and the h-index have also been used to measure the academic impact of academics. There are, however, several serious problems with relying on journal rankings, journal impact factors and citation counts. For example, articles without any impact may be published in highly ranked journals or journals with high impact factor, whereas articles with high impact could be published in lower ranked journals or journals with low impact factor. Citation counts can also be easily gamed and manipulated and the h-index disadvantages early career academics. This paper discusses these and several other problems and suggests alternatives such as post-publication peer review and open-access journals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document