Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
P.F. Buckley
2013 ◽  
Vol 209 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andor E. Simon ◽  
Stefan Borgwardt ◽  
Anita Riecher-Rössler ◽  
Eva Velthorst ◽  
Lieuwe de Haan ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Fusar-Poli ◽  
Andreas Bechdolf ◽  
Matthew John Taylor ◽  
Ilaria Bonoldi ◽  
William T. Carpenter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 2838-2847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Krop ◽  
Nofisat Ismaila ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
Robert C. Bast ◽  
William Barlow ◽  
...  

Purpose This focused update addresses the use of MammaPrint (Agendia, Irvine, CA) to guide decisions on the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Methods ASCO uses a signals approach to facilitate guideline updates. For this focused update, the publication of the phase III randomized MINDACT (Microarray in Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy) study to evaluate the MammaPrint assay in 6,693 women with early-stage breast cancer provided a signal. An expert panel reviewed the results of the MINDACT study along with other published literature on the MammaPrint assay to assess for evidence of clinical utility. Recommendations If a patient has hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, node-negative breast cancer, the MammaPrint assay may be used in those with high clinical risk to inform decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy due to its ability to identify a good-prognosis population with potentially limited chemotherapy benefit. Women in the low clinical risk category did not benefit from chemotherapy regardless of genomic MammaPrint risk group. Therefore, the MammaPrint assay does not have clinical utility in such patients. If a patient has hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer, the MammaPrint assay may be used in patients with one to three positive nodes and a high clinical risk to inform decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. However, such patients should be informed that a benefit from chemotherapy cannot be excluded, particularly in patients with greater than one involved lymph node. The clinician should not use the MammaPrint assay to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer at low clinical risk, nor any patient with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, because of the lack of definitive data in these populations. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiana Montemagni ◽  
Silvio Bellino ◽  
Nadja Bracale ◽  
Paola Bozzatello ◽  
Paola Rocca

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Aleh Kuzniatsou ◽  
Andrei Shpakou

Background: With the development of genetic research in oncology, it has become possible to track and identify early and preclinical forms of hereditary oncological diseases, which allows timely and effective preventive and therapeutic measures in relation to relatives at risk. Aim of the study: Assessment of genetically determined neoplasms in the region and the development of organizational forms and methods for early diagnosis. Material and methods: 10,727 residents of the Belarus-Poland border region were examined. Clinical and medical history data of 2,054 patients with tumors of the breast (1406), ovaries (239), and colon (409) were analyzed. As a result of the questionnaire, three main observation groups were formed: “high risk of hereditary cancer”, “hereditary cancer suspected”, and “no risk of hereditary cancer”. Results: Register and hospital screenings were the most informative types of screening. Of the 149 HBC patients who underwent molecular genetic testing, BRCA1 gene mutations were found in 5.37%, 5382insC in all cases. Seven mutations were detected in 77 individuals with a diagnosis of HOC and in 6 cases 5382insC and in 2 - 4145delA. Signs of hereditary ovarian cancer and suspicion of it were found in 1.12%, including people who were found to have a high risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. By their effectiveness, register and hospital screenings significantly exceeded the population, p<0.01. 1.67% of women suffering from this disease met the high clinical risk criteria for hereditary ovarian cancer. A high clinical risk of hereditary tumor genesis was established in 0.73% of cases among patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer. Conclusions: The results of assessing the clinical risk of hereditary cancer according to population screening indicates that approximately 1.2% of the population has an increased clinical risk of developing hereditary breast, ovarian, and colon cancer.


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
J.Y. Park ◽  
D.H. Kang ◽  
J.S. Choi ◽  
M.H. Jung ◽  
W.H. Jung ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
Andrew Thompson ◽  
Barnaby Nelson ◽  
Hok Pan Yuen ◽  
Paul G. Amminger ◽  
Patrick D. McGorry ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document