A novel nonfluoroscopic catheter visualization system (LocaLisa) to reduce radiation exposure during catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias

2002 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus Kirchhof ◽  
Peter Loh ◽  
Lars Eckardt ◽  
Michael Ribbing ◽  
Sascha Rolf ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahman ◽  
Jeremy P. Moore ◽  
John Papagiannis ◽  
Grace Smith ◽  
Chris Anderson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with CHD can be exposed to high levels of cumulative ionising radiation. Utilisation of electroanatomic mapping during catheter ablation leads to reduced radiation exposure in the general population but has not been well studied in patients with CHD. This study evaluated the radiation sparing benefit of using three-dimensional mapping in patients with CHD. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the Catheter Ablation with Reduction or Elimination of Fluoroscopy multi-institutional registry. Patients with CHD were selected. Those with previous ablations, concurrent diagnostic or interventional catheterisation and unknown arrhythmogenic foci were excluded. The control cohort was matched for operating physician, arrhythmia mechanism, arrhythmia location, weight and age. The procedure time, rate of fluoroscopy use, fluoroscopy time, procedural success, complications, and distribution of procedures per year were compared between the two groups. Results: Fifty-six patients with congenital heart disease and 56 matched patients without CHD were included. The mean total procedure time was significantly higher in patients with CHD (212.6 versus 169.5 minutes, p = 0.003). Their median total fluoroscopy time was 4.4 minutes (compared to 1.8 minutes), and their rate of fluoroscopy use was 23% (compared to 13%). The acute success and minor complication rates were similar and no major complications occurred. Conclusions: With the use of electroanatomic mapping during catheter ablation, fluoroscopy use can be reduced in patients with CHD. The majority of patients with CHD received zero fluoroscopy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fehmi Keçe ◽  
Katja Zeppenfeld ◽  
Serge A Trines ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation currently referred for catheter ablation is increasing. However, the number of trained operators and the capacity of many electrophysiology labs are limited. Accordingly, a steeper learning curve and technical advances for efficient and safe ablation are desirable. During the last decades several catheter-based ablation devices have been developed and adapted to improve not only lesion durability, but also safety profiles, to shorten procedure time and to reduce radiation exposure. The goal of this review is to summarise the reported incidence of complications, considering device-related specific aspects for point-bypoint, multi-electrode and balloon-based devices for pulmonary vein isolation. Recent technical and procedural developments aimed at reducing procedural risks and complications rates will be reviewed. In addition, the impact of technical advances on procedural outcome, procedural length and radiation exposure will be discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Prolic Kalinsek ◽  
D Zizek ◽  
D Kuhelj ◽  
B Antolic ◽  
J Stublar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) is traditionally performed with the aid of fluoroscopy. However, ionizing radiation is associated with potentially harmful deterministic and stochastic effects to the patient and operator. Many methods have been suggested to reduce the radiation exposure, one of the methods, which completely eliminates ionizing radiation exposure, is zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation. Purpose Our aim was to assess feasibility, success rate and safety of zero-fluoroscopy CA for treatment of various right and left-sided SVTs with the use of three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical mapping system (EAM) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Methods Consecutive 274 patients (140 male, mean age 33.5±21.8 years) with documented SVTs underwent CA in our center from April 2014 to May 2018. All procedures were performed with the 3D EAM without any use of fluoroscopic guidance. ICE was used as primary visual modality when left-sided approach was required. The procedural endpoint for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) was nodal rhythm during radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery and non-inducibility. The procedural endpoint for focal atrial tachycardia (AT) was termination and non-inducibility. The procedural endpoint for accessory pathway (AP) mediated tachycardia was absence of bidirectional conduction over the AP. The procedural endpoint for typical atrial flutter (AFL) was bidirectional block over the cavo-tricuspid isthmus. Results One hundred thirty two patients had AVNRT, 79 had AP mediated tachycardia (47 left-sided, 25 septal and 7 right-sided), 31 patients had AT (8 left-sided), 32 patients had AFL. Cryo-ablation was used in 14 (14/132, 10.6%) patients with AVNRT and 5 patients with septal AP (5/25, 20%), RF was used in the rest. The procedural endpoint was achieved in all procedures (100%). During the mean follow-up of 343±253 days the recurrence rate for AVNRT, AP mediated tachycardia, focal AT, AFL was 7.5%, 16.4%, 32.3% and 9.4%, respectively. No procedural complications were observed. Conclusions Zero-fluoroscopy CA of right and left-sided SVTs with the use of the 3DEAM and ICE is feasible, safe and results in promising long-term success rates after single CA procedure. Acknowledgement/Funding None


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matevž Jan ◽  
David Žižek ◽  
Tine Prolič Kalinšek ◽  
Dimitrij Kuhelj ◽  
Primož Trunk ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment option for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, with the complex nature of most procedures, patients and staff bare an increased radiation exposure. Near-zero or zero-fluoroscopy CA is an alternative method which could substantially reduce or even eliminate the radiation dose. Our aim was to analyse procedural outcomes with fluoroscopy minimising approach for treatment of VAs in patients with structurally normal hearts (SNH) and structural heart disease (SHD). Methods Fifty-two (age 53.4 ± 17.8 years, 38 male, 14 female) consecutive patients who underwent CA of VAs in our institution between May 2018 and December 2019 were included. Procedures were performed primarily with the aid of the three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system and intra-cardiac echocardiography. Fluoroscopy was considered only in left ventricular (LV) summit mapping for coronary angiography and when epicardial approach was planned. Acute and long-term procedural outcomes were analysed. Results Sixty CA procedures were performed. Twenty-five patients had SHD-related VAs (Group 1) and 27 patients had SNH (Group 2). While Group 1 had significantly higher total procedural time (256.9 ± 71.7 vs 123.6 ± 42.2 min; p < 0.001) compared to Group 2, overall procedural success rate [77.4% (24/31) vs 89.7% (26/29); p = 0.20)] and recurrence rate after the first procedure [8/25, (32%) vs 8/27, (29.6%); p = 0.85] were similar in both groups. Fluoroscopy was used in 3 procedures in Group 1 where epicardial approach was needed and in 4 procedures in Group 2 where LV summit VAs were ablated. Overall procedure-related major complication rate was 5%. Conclusions Fluoroscopy minimising approach for CA of VAs is feasible and safe in patients with SHD and SNH. Fluoroscopy could not be completely abolished in VAs with epicardial and LV summit substrate location.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary R. Small ◽  
R. Glenn Wells ◽  
Thomas Schindler ◽  
Benjamin J.W. Chow ◽  
Terrence D. Ruddy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Irina A. Kriukova ◽  
Evgeniy Y. Kriukov ◽  
Danil A. Kozyrev ◽  
Semen A. Sotniкov ◽  
Dmitriy A. Iova ◽  
...  

Background. Birth head trauma causing intracranial injury is one of the most common causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. In case of suspected cranial fractures and intracranial hematomas, diagnostic methods involving radiation, such as x-ray radiography and computed tomography, are recommended. Recently, an increasing number of studies have highlighted the risk of cancer complications associated with computed tomography in infants. Therefore, diagnostic methods that reduce radiation exposure in neonates are important. One such method is ultrasonography (US). Aim. We evaluated US as a non-ionizing radiation method for diagnosis of cranial bone fractures and epidural hematomas in newborns with cephalohematomas or other birth head traumas. Material and methods. The study group included 449 newborns with the most common variant of birth head trauma: cephalohematomas. All newborns underwent transcranial-transfontanelle US for detection of intracranial changes and cranial US for visualization of bone structure in the cephalohematoma region. Children with ultrasonic signs of cranial fractures and epidural hematomas were further examined at a children’s hospital by x-ray radiography and/or computed tomography. Results and discussion. We found that cranial US for diagnosis of cranial fractures and transcranial-transfontanelle US for diagnosis of epidural hematomas in newborns were highly effective. In newborns with parietal cephalohematomas (444 children), 17 (3.8%) had US signs of linear fracture of the parietal bone, and 5 (1.1%) had signs of ipsilateral epidural hematoma. Epidural hematomas were visualized only when US was performed through the temporal bone and not by using the transfontanelle approach. Sixteen cases of linear fractures and all epidural hematomas were confirmed by computed tomography. Conclusion. The use of US diagnostic methods reduced radiation exposure in newborns with birth head trauma. US methods (transcranial-transfontanelle and cranial) can be used in screening for diagnosis and personalized monitoring of changes in birth head trauma as well as to reduce radiation exposure.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed fahmy ◽  
Mohamed Youssif ◽  
Hazem Rhashad ◽  
Waleed Dawoud ◽  
Ibrahim Mokhless

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document