Individuals at High-Risk for an Acute Infliximab Infusion Reaction: What Factors are Predictive of a Reaction and are Premedications Effective at Reducing the Risk?

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S792-S793
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Gold ◽  
Yecheskel Schneider ◽  
Shirley A. Cohen-Mekelburg ◽  
Nicole T. Shen ◽  
Alec Faggen ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3116-3116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Hans C. Lee ◽  
Krina K. Patel ◽  
Connor Graham ◽  
...  

Background High risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRSMM), defined as having immunoparesis and at least 95% abnormal plasma cells/all plasma cells by advanced flow cytometry, has a risk of progression to multiple myeloma of about 75% after 5 years of diagnosis. These patient have no symptoms and current standard is to follow them without treatment. Isatuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to CD38 highly expressed in myeloma cells. Isatuximab has activity as monotherapy (overall response rate (ORR) 35%), with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ORR 56%) and pomalidomide/dexamethasone (ORR 62%) in relapsed MM. We designed a phase II study to test the efficacy of isatuximab in high risk smoldering myeloma. Our study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02960555. Methods The primary endpoint of the study is the ORR of isatuximab 20 mg/kg IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 cycle 1; days 1, 15 cycles 2-6 and day 1 cycles 7-30 in high risk smoldering myeloma. 24 patients were accrued in the first stage (of maximum 61 patients). Secondary endpoints are PFS, OS, clinical benefit rate (CBR). Exploratory endpoints are quality of life analysis (QoL), MRD, molecular/immune characterization using DNA/RNA sequencing of myeloma cells and the microenvironment before and after treatment. Results 24 patients with HRSMM were accrued from 02/08/2017 until 12/21/2018 (Table 1). All patients are evaluable for response. Best responses: ORR (≥PR) 15(62.5%), CR MRD- flow at 10-5 1 (5%), VGPR 4 (17%), PR 10 (42%), minor response (MR) 4 (18%), stable disease 5 (21%); CBR (≥MR) 79%. Median number of cycles received were 11.5 (range 6-30). Five patients have stopped treatment (one has completed the study, one with heavy history of smoking was diagnosed with squamous cell cancer of the tongue, one could no longer travel to treatments due to relocation, two progressed to active multiple myeloma after 16 and 6 cycles of treatment, respectively). There have been no deaths. DNA/RNA seq is ongoing for biomarkers of response. There were 5 grade 3 severe treatment-related adverse events (RAE) which resolved to baseline: dyspnea -related to infusion reaction (n=2), headache (n=1), ANC decrease (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1). Most common grade 1-2 related adverse events (n): nausea (7), vomit (5), WBC decrease (3), diarrhea (3), fatigue (6), headache (4), mucositis (4), myalgia (4) and infusion reaction (3). In patients with available QoL functional scores (n=9 at baseline and n=7 after 6 months of therapy), isatuximab was effective in reducing their anxiety and worry of progression to multiple myeloma. Isatuximab also improved general QoL scores by the end of cycle 6 of treatment which were now comparable to those in the general population (Figure 1). Conclusion Isatuximab is very well tolerated, results in high response rates in HRSMM and has the potential to change the natural history of this disease. In ongoing QoL analysis, initial data shows improvement in QoL and decreased cancer worry after isatuximab treatment. Immune-genomic analysis is ongoing and may identify patients that benefit the most from treatment. Disclosures Manasanch: celgene: Honoraria; merck: Research Funding; quest diagnostics: Research Funding; sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Jagannath:Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Lee:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline plc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Cellectis, Abbvie: Research Funding; Oncopeptides, Nektar, Precision Biosciences, BMS: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kaufman:Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Thomas:Xencor: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Mailankody:Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Lendvai:Janssen: Employment. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy. Orlowski:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Landgren:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC. OffLabel Disclosure: Isatuximab for the treatment of smoldering myeloma


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 941-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara M Ryan ◽  
Marielle Romberg ◽  
Frank Wolters ◽  
Reinhold W Stockbrugger

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7511-7511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Matthew Alexander Lunning ◽  
Julie Vose ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
...  

7511 Background: Novel targeted agents are emerging for B-cell malignancies, but few studies have safely combined these agents. Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel glycoengineered mAb targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen. TGR-1202 is a next generation, once daily PI3Kδ inhibitor, demonstrating a favorable safety profile compared to prior inhibitors, including in long-term follow up (Burris, 2016). This Ph 1 trial evaluates the safety/efficacy of the triplet combination of a novel anti-CD20 mAb + PI3Kδ + BTK inhibitor (ibrutinib) in pts with B-cell malignancies. Methods: Eligible pts had CLL or rel/ref NHL w/o limit to prior therapies, including those ref to prior PI3Kδ or BTK inhibitors. UTX dosed on D1, 8, 15 of C1; D1 of C2-6, and C9 & 12. TGR-1202 dose escalated (400/600/800mg QD), ibrutinib dosed at 420mg (CLL) or 560mg (NHL), both on C1D1. Results: 38 pts were enrolled: 20 CLL/SLL and 18 NHL, including 6 follicular (FL), 6 DLBCL, 4 mantle cell (MCL) and 2 marginal zone (MZL). Med age 65 yrs (range 32-85); 29 M/9 F; med prior tx = 3 (range 0-6). 2 pts were ref to prior PI3Kδ and 2 were prev treated with ibrutinib (1 ref/1 rel). MTD was not reached. Most common ( > 20%) all causality AE’s were fatigue (42%), diarrhea (39%), dizziness (34%), nausea (32%), neutropenia, pyrexia, rash, infusion reaction, insomnia (each at 29%), thrombocytopenia, cough (each at 26%), anemia (24%) and sinusitis (21%). GR 3/4 AE’s were minimal, the only event > 10% was neutropenia (16%). ORR amongst 36 evaluable pts is shown in the table below. 53% of evaluable CLL pts had high-risk cytogenetics and 4/6 DLBCL pts were non-GCB. One CLL pt (17p/11q del) ref to both PI3Kδ and ibrutinib achieved a CR. Med time on study is 10 mos (range 1 – 27+ mos). Med DOR not reached (range 3 – 24+ mos). Conclusions: This is the first known triple combination of an anti-CD20 mAb + PI3Kδ + BTK inhibitor. The combination of UTX, TGR-1202, and ibrutinib has been well tolerated with activity observed across heavily pre-treated and high-risk B-cell malignancies. Expansion cohorts at the highest dose (800mg TGR-1202 + full dose ibrutinib) are underway. Future trials for the triplet are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02006485. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Soong ◽  
Bahman Sotoodian ◽  
Alain Brassard

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 705-708
Author(s):  
Erin J. Munsel ◽  
Peter J. Bryan ◽  
Bryce A. Binstadt ◽  
Danielle Bullock ◽  
Colleen K. Correll ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES To compare infusion reaction rates between rapid infliximab (REMICADE, Janssen Biotech Inc) infusions and previous standard 2- to 3-hour infusions; additionally, to assess patient satisfaction and reduction in chair time associated with rapid infliximab infusions. METHODS Pediatric rheumatology and gastroenterology patients receiving maintenance infliximab therapy using a standard 2- to 3-hour titrated infusion had the opportunity to enroll in the non-titrated rapid 1-hour infusion protocol following tolerance of induction dosing at 0, 2, and 6 weeks. Patients were included from December 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018, via retrospective chart review and patient satisfaction surveys. RESULTS Data were collected on 55 patients receiving a total of 160 rapid infliximab infusions. There were 2 infusion reactions during the enrollment and data collection period, resulting in an overall infusion reaction rate of 1.3%. The patient satisfaction survey results showed all patients were at minimum satisfied with the information provided regarding rapid infliximab, decreased time spent in clinic, ease of scheduling, and overall process. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest rapid infliximab infusions are safe in pediatric rheumatology and gastroenterology patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusion therapy. The overall infusion reaction rate of 1.3% in this study is well below the accepted infusion reaction rate of standard-length infliximab infusions of 2% to 3%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A379-A379
Author(s):  
Bilal Siddiqui ◽  
Brian Chapin ◽  
Sonali Jindal ◽  
Fei Duan ◽  
Shalini Singh ◽  
...  

BackgroundProstate cancer is ”immunologically cold,” with enrichment of myeloid populations, immunosuppressive cytokines, and few T cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). CD38 is expressed on myeloid cells, T cells, plasma B cells, and NK cells. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) controls macrophage differentiation and function. We hypothesized that either anti-CD38 (daratumumab) or CSF-1R inhibitor (edicotinib) would be safe and well-tolerated for primary prostate cancer, with successful target modulation on immune populations within the TME.MethodsIn this single-center, open-label, presurgical study, patients were enrolled into Arm A (daratumumab, four weekly doses pre-surgery) or Arm B (edicotinib, orally daily for four weeks pre-surgery). Patients had high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (at least 1 core Gleason ≥8) appropriate for radical prostatectomy (RP), ≥3 biopsies involved with cancer, and no radiographic evidence of metastatic disease. Treated and untreated (Gleason-matched) fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostatectomy specimens and paired blood (PBMCs), bone marrow biopsies (BMBx) and aspirates (BMA) were evaluated for target modulation using IHC (prostate, BMBx) and flow cytometry (prostate, BMA, PBMCs). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events (AEs). The secondary endpoint was pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate.ResultsTwenty-five patients were treated (Arm A, n=15; Arm B, n=10) and completed four doses of daratumumab or four weeks of edicotinib prior to RP. The most common AEs were Arm A: daratumumab infusion reaction (33%, 5/15); Arm B: increased aspartate aminotransferase (40%, 4/10). Grade 3 related AEs in Arm A occurred in 3 patients (12%; infusion reaction, n=2; urticaria, n=1), with no Grade 4/5 related events. No ≥Grade 3 related AEs occurred in Arm B. All patients completed surgery, however no patients achieved pCR. IHC revealed lower density of CD38+ cells in daratumumab-treated vs. untreated prostate tumors and in patient-matched post-treatment vs. pre-treatment BMBx. Similarly, flow cytometry showed decreased frequency of CD38+ T cells and macrophages in daratumumab-treated vs. untreated prostate tumors and patient-matched post-treatment vs. pre-treatment PBMCs and BMAs. Edicotinib did not demonstrate an impact on CSF-1R+ immune cells in prostate, bone marrow, or PBMCs.ConclusionsDaratumumab and edicotinib were safe and well-tolerated as presurgical therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer, with no pCRs. Evidence of target modulation was consistently observed in prostate tumors, bone marrow, and PBMCs for daratumumab, but not edicotinib. Myeloid-targeted agents such as daratumumab alone are insufficient to generate anti-tumor responses in prostate cancer.Trial RegistrationNCT03177460Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board; protocol numbers 2017–0103 and PA13-0291.


1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Fitch ◽  
Thomas F. Williams ◽  
Josephine E. Etienne

The critical need to identify children with hearing loss and provide treatment at the earliest possible age has become increasingly apparent in recent years (Northern & Downs, 1978). Reduction of the auditory signal during the critical language-learning period can severely limit the child's potential for developing a complete, effective communication system. Identification and treatment of children having handicapping conditions at an early age has gained impetus through the Handicapped Children's Early Education Program (HCEEP) projects funded by the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped (BEH).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document