scholarly journals Regulation of MAP kinase activation induced by the stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors.

1996 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
Noriyasu Hirasawa ◽  
Suetsugu Mue ◽  
Kazuo Ohuchi
Nature ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 383 (6600) ◽  
pp. 547-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Dikic ◽  
George Tokiwa ◽  
Sima Lev ◽  
Sara A. Courtneidge ◽  
Joseph Schlessinger

1998 ◽  
Vol 330 (2) ◽  
pp. 605-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Gerben ZONDAG ◽  
R. Friso POSTMA ◽  
Ingrid VAN ETTEN ◽  
Ingrid VERLAAN ◽  
H. Wouter MOOLENAAR

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are structurally related lipid mediators that act on distinct G-protein-coupled receptors to evoke similar responses, including Ca2+ mobilization, adenylate cyclase inhibition, and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation. However, little is still known about the respective receptors. A recently cloned putative LPA receptor (Vzg-1/Edg-2) is similar to an orphan Gi-coupled receptor termed Edg-1. Here we show that expression of Edg-1 in Sf9 and COS-7 cells results in inhibition of adenylate cyclase and activation of MAP kinase (Gi-mediated), but not Ca2+ mobilization, in response to S1P. These responses are specific in that (i) S1P action is not mimicked by LPA, and (ii) Vzg-1/Edg-2 cannot substitute for Edg-1. Thus the Edg-1 receptor is capable of mediating a subset of the cellular responses to S1P.


2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Luttrell

A growing body of data supports the conclusion that G protein-coupled receptors can regulate cellular growth and differentiation by controlling the activity of MAP kinases. The activation of heterotrimeric G protein pools initiates a complex network of signals leading to MAP kinase activation that frequently involves cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases or focal adhesions. The dominant mechanism of MAP kinase activation varies significantly between receptor and cell type. Moreover, the mechanism of MAP kinase activation has a substantial impact on MAP kinase function. Some signals lead to the targeting of activated MAP kinase to specific extranuclear locations, while others activate a MAP kinase pool that is free to translocate to the nucleus and contribute to a mitogenic response.


2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis M Luttrell

Over the past decade, it has become apparent that many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) generate signals that control cellular differentiation and growth, including stimulation of Ras family GTPases and activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways. The mechanisms that GPCRs use to control the activity of MAP kinases vary between receptor and cell type but fall broadly into one of three categories: signals initiated by classical G protein effectors, e.g., protein kinase (PK)A and PKC, signals initiated by cross-talk between GPCRs and classical receptor tyrosine kinases, e.g., "transactivation" of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, and signals initiated by direct interaction between β-arrestins and components of the MAP kinase cascade, e.g., β-arrestin "scaffolds". While each of these pathways results in increased cellular MAP kinase activity, emerging data suggest that they are not functionally redundant. MAP kinase activation occurring via PKC-dependent pathways and EGF receptor transactivation leads to nuclear translocation of the kinase and stimulates cell proliferation, while MAP kinase activation via β-arrestin scaffolds primarily increases cytosolic kinase activity. By controlling the spatial and temporal distribution of MAP kinase activity within the cell, the consequences of GPCR-stimulated MAP kinase activation may be determined by the mechanism by which they are activated.Key words: G-protein-coupled receptor, receptor tyrosine kinase, β-arrestin, mitogen-activated protein kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.


2002 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yibing Yan ◽  
Kyoko Shirakabe ◽  
Zena Werb

Communication between different signaling pathways enables cells to coordinate the responses to diverse environmental signals. Activation of the transmembrane growth factor precursors plays a critical role in this communication and often involves metalloprotease-mediated proteolysis. Stimulation of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCR) transactivates the EGF receptors (EGFRs), which occurs via a metalloprotease-dependent cleavage of heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF). However, the metalloprotease mediating the transactivation remains elusive. We show that the integral membrane metalloprotease Kuzbanian (KUZ; ADAM10), which controls Notch signaling in Drosophila, stimulates GPCR transactivation of EGFR. Upon stimulation of the bombesin receptors, KUZ increases the docking and activation of adaptors Src homology 2 domain–containing protein and Gab1 on the EGFR, and activation of Ras and Erk. In contrast, transfection of a protease domain–deleted KUZ, or blocking endogenous KUZ by morpholino antisense oligonucleotides, suppresses the transactivation. The effect of KUZ on shedding of HB-EGF and consequent transactivation of the EGFR depends on its metalloprotease activity. GPCR activation enhances the association of KUZ and its substrate HB-EGF with tetraspanin CD9. Thus, KUZ regulates the relay between the GPCR and EGFR signaling pathways.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar Böcker ◽  
Eugen J. Verspohl

MAP (mitogen-activated protein) kinase (also called Erk 1/2) plays a crucial role in cell proliferation and differentiation. Its impact on secretory events is less well established. The interplay of protein kinase C (PKC), PI3-kinase nd cellular tyrosine kinase with MAP kinase activity using inhibitors and compounds such as glucose, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and agonists of G-protein coupled receptors like gastrin releasing peptide (GRP), oxytocin (OT) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) was investigated in INS-1 cells, an insulin secreting cell line. MAP kinase activity was determined by using a peptide derived from the EGF receptor as a MAP kinase substrate and [P32]ATP. Glucose as well as GRP, OT and GIP exhibited a time-dependent increase in MAP kinase activity with a maximum at time point 2.5 min. All further experiments were performed using 2.5 min incubations. The flavone PD 098059 is known to bind to the inactive forms of MEK1 (MAPK/ERK-Kinase) thus preventing activation by upstream activators. 20 μM PD 098059 (IC50=51 μM) inhibited MAP kinase stimulated by either glucose, GRP, OT, GIP or PMA. Inhibiton (“downregulation”) of PKC by a long term (22h) pretreatment with 1 μM PMA did not influence MAP kinase activity when augmented by either of the above mentioned compound. To investigate whether PI3-kinase and cellular tyrosine kinase are involved in G-protein mediated effects on MAP kinase, inhibitors were used: 100 nM wortmannin (PI3-kinase inhibitor) reduced the effects of GRP, OT and GIP but not that of PMA; 100 μM genistein (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) inhibited the stimulatory effect of either above mentioned compound on MAP kinase activation. Inhibition of MAP kinase by 20 μM PD 098059 did not influence insulin secretion modulated by either compound (glucose, GRP, OT or GIP). [H3]Thymidine incorporation, however, was severely inhibited by PD 098059. Thus MAP kinase is important for INS-1 cell proliferation but not for its insulin secretory response with respect to major initiators and modulators of insulin release. The data indicate that MAP kinase is active and under the control of MAP kinase. PKC is upstream of a genisteinsensitive tyrosine kinase and probably downstream of a PI3-kinase in INS-1 cells.


1997 ◽  
Vol 272 (31) ◽  
pp. 19125-19132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Della Rocca ◽  
Tim van Biesen ◽  
Yehia Daaka ◽  
Deirdre K. Luttrell ◽  
Louis M. Luttrell ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1342-1342
Author(s):  
Xingkui Xue ◽  
Andreas Boehmler ◽  
Lothar Kanz ◽  
Gabriele Seitz ◽  
Robert Mohle

Abstract We have previously demonstrated consistent and high expression of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) CXCR4, cysLT1 and S1P1 in human hematopoetic progenitor and stem cells (HPC). All of these receptors induced chemotactic responses in mobilized CD34+ HPC. As their ligands are present in the hematopoietic microenvironment, these GPCR may be involved in HPC homing and/or proliferation. Ligands for CXCR4 (SDF-1) and cysLT1 (cys-leukotrienes) are both produced by stromal cells, while the S1P1 ligand (sphingosine 1-phosphate, S1P) is released by megakaryocytes and platelets. As GPCR may activate multiple signaling pathways resulting in different functional effects, we compared the signaling capacities of CXCR4, cysLT1 and S1P1 in CD34+ HPC and CD34+ progenitor cell lines. At optimal ligand concentrations, cysLT1 mediated the strongest intracellular calcium fluxes, in contrast to CXCR4 (intermediate response) and S1P1 (almost absent calcium fluxes). Pertussis toxin (PTX) only partially inhibited cysLT1-mediated calcium signaling, indicating coupling of the receptor to both Gi and Gq proteins, while CXCR4-mediated responses were exclusively PTX-sensitive and therefore only Gi-dependent. Both cysLT1 and CXCR4 induced phosphorylation of the proliferation-related p44/42 (Erk) MAP kinase. Again, much stronger responses were mediated by cysLT1, which again were only partially PTX-sensitive. No Erk/MAP kinase activation was mediated by S1P1. We could demonstrate that pyk2, a kinase that links calcium signaling with Erk/MAP kinase activation, was involved in Gq-mediated signaling of cysLT1, as its phosphorylation was not inhibited by PTX. The fact that cysLT1 employs both Gi and Gq-mediated signaling pathways, while CXCR4 signaling was exclusively Gi-dependent, may explain why enhanced proliferation of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells in cytokine-supplemented serum-free liquid cultures was only seen in response to ligands of cysLT1, but not in response to the CXCR4 ligand SDF-1. Activation of CXCR4 resulted in phosphorylation of Akt, which was not observed in response to ligands of cysLT1, while both GPCR induced translocation of NFkappaB to the nucleus. We conclude that in CD34+ HPC, Gi protein-mediated signaling of CXCR4 is mainly involved in cell migration, while Gi and Gq-mediated signaling of cysLT1 also affects cell proliferation predominantly by combined and profound activation of the Erk/MAP kinase pathway. The signaling capacity of S1P1 however was limited compared to the other GPCRs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document