SUPPORTIVE CARE, PAIN MANAGEMENT, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peg Esper ◽  
Bruce G. Redman
2021 ◽  
pp. 412-429
Author(s):  
Alejandra Calvo-Schimmel ◽  
Suparna Qanungo ◽  
Susan Newman ◽  
Katherine Sterba

Background: Supportive care interventions can improve quality of life and health outcomes of advanced prostate cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of unmet needs, supportive care for this population is sparse. Methods: The databases PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles. Data were extracted, organized by thematic matrix, and categorized according to the seven domains of the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care. Results: The search yielded 1678 articles, of which 18 were included in the review and critically appraised. Most studies were cross-sectional with small, non-diverse samples. Supportive care interventions reported for advanced prostate cancer survivors are limited with some positive trends. Most outcomes were symptom-focused and patient self-reported (e.g., anxiety, pain, self-efficacy) evaluated by questionnaires or interview. Interventions delivered in group format reported improvements in more outcomes. Conclusions: Additional supportive care intervention are needed for men with advanced prostate cancer. Because of their crucial position in caring for cancer patients, nurse scientists and clinicians must partner to research and develop patient-centered, culturally relevant supportive care interventions that improve this population’s quality of life and health outcomes. Efforts must concentrate on sampling, domains of needs, theoretical framework, guidelines, and measurement instruments.


Author(s):  
Raj R. Bhanvadia ◽  
Roger K. Khouri ◽  
Caleb Ashbrook ◽  
Solomon L. Woldu ◽  
Vitaly Margulis ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerryann Lotfi-Jam ◽  
Karla Gough ◽  
Penelope Schofield ◽  
Sanchia Aranda

AbstractObjective:This study examines the ability of the distress thermometer to accurately identify patients with higher symptoms, unmet needs and psychological morbidity.Methods:Baseline data collected as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a nurse-led supportive care intervention for men with prostate cancer commencing radiotherapy at a specialist cancer hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Measures assessed global distress (DT), anxious and depressive symptomatology (HADS), prostate-cancer specific quality of life (EPIC-26), unmet supportive care needs (SCNS-SF34R) and cancer treatment-related concerns (CATS). Following descriptive and correlational analysis, hierarchical multiple regression was employed to examine the contribution of variable sets to explaining variance in DT scores.Results:Less than 20% of men reported DT scores of 4 or higher, indicating overall low distress. The DT accurately identified almost all men reporting HADS score indicative of anxious or depressive symptomatology, suggesting it accurately identifies psychological morbidity. Importantly, the DT identified a further group of distressed men, not identified by HADS, whose distress related to unmet needs and prostate cancer-specific issues, indicating the DT is superior in identifying other forms of distress. While the hierarchical multiple regression confirmed anxious and depressive symptomatology as the best predictor of distress score, many other scales are also good predictors of DT scores, supporting the argument that distress is multi-determined.Significance of results:Nurses can be confident that the DT accurately identifies patients with psychological morbidity and importantly identifies other patients with distress who may require intervention. A distress score of 4 or higher identified participants with higher physical symptomatology, higher unmet needs, more concerns about treatment and poorer quality of life. The low prevalence of distress reaching cut off scores suggests nurses would not be overwhelmed by the outcomes of screening and could use the score to prioritise the patients who need greater attention at entry to radiotherapy services.


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenglin Huang

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of transurethral resection of prostate and the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and bladder outlet infarction, and to analyze the therapeutic effect. Methods: 34 patients with advanced prostate cancer admitted in our hospital from April 2014 to April 2014 were divided into control group (17 cases) with routine endocrine therapy. The study group (17 cases) underwent urethral resection surgery Combined with endocrine therapy, through the relevant indicators of prostate treatment were observed to explore the two groups of patients with therapeutic effect. Results: According to the related indexes of prostate treatment, the treatment effect of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group, and the data of the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of advanced prostate cancer patients with endocrine combined with transurethral resection of the prostate can effectively treat the symptoms of bladder outlet infarction and improve the quality of life of patients. It has certain value in clinical treatment.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretschmer ◽  
Roderick C. N. van den Bergh ◽  
Alberto Martini ◽  
Giancarlo Marra ◽  
Massimo Valerio ◽  
...  

With the therapeutic landscape of advanced prostate cancer rapidly evolving and oncological benefits being shown for a plethora of new agents and indications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL)-associated evidence is still subpar. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of HRQOL for patients with advanced PC (metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)), and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate HRQOL in recent randomized trials. Furthermore, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use in clinical practice, as well as potential strategies for improvement of HRQOL evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document