MON-PP174: Evaluation of Nutritional Status with Six Nutrition Screening Tools and Bioimpedance in Hospitalized Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S193
Author(s):  
M. Lainscak ◽  
A. Schols ◽  
T. Kosten ◽  
Z. Krznaric
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutrition Screening

scholarly journals Nutritional Screening and Clinical Outcome in Hospitalized Patients with Crohn’s Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 266-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azusa Takaoka ◽  
Masaya Sasaki  ◽  
Naoko Nakanishi ◽  
Mika Kurihara ◽  
Akiko Ohi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Intestinal Resection ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002

Background/Aims: Hospitalized patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) can develop severe nutritional deficits. However, the nutritional screening tools with the most utility for such patients are still unknown. Methods: Nutritional status of 40 CD patients was assessed on admission using several screening tools and laboratory tests. Their validity was evaluated in relation to length of hospital stay (LOS) and intestinal resection. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to predict prolonged LOS (≥28 days). Results: Prolonged LOS was correlated with each of the following screening parameters: Subjective Global Assessment, Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Onodera’s Prognostic Nutritional Index (O-PNI), Controlling Nutritional Status, serum albumin level, and weight loss. These parameters were not correlated with intestinal resection. Evaluation of prognostic yield showed cutoff values of serum albumin 3.3 g/dL (AUC 0.797, sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 89.5%) and O-PNI 36.5 (0.749, 71.4%, 73.7%). By combining the serum albumin cutoff value and NRS 2002 score, patients were divided into 4 groups, with a prolonged LOS rate of 68.2% in the group with the worst prognosis. Conclusions: A combination of serum albumin (given the simplicity of testing) and NRS 2002 as nutritional screening tools may be useful for hospitalized CD patients.

scholarly journals Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Parasite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Zhan Wang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ge Song ◽  
MingQuan Pang ◽  
Bin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002

Background: Echinococcosis is a chronic consumptive liver disease. Little research has been carried out on the nutritional status of infected patients, though liver diseases are often associated with malnutrition. Our study investigated four different nutrition screening tools, to assess nutritional risks of hospitalized patients with echinococcosis. Methods: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) were used to assess 164 patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and 232 with cystic echinococcosis (CE). Results were then compared with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Results: According to ESPEN standards for malnutrition diagnosis, 29.2% of CE patients and 31.1% of AE patients were malnourished. The malnutrition risk rates for CE and AE patients were as follows: NRS 2002 – 40.3% and 30.7%; MUST – 51.5% and 50.9%; MNA-SF – 46.8% and 44.1%; and NRI – 51.1% and 67.4%. In patients with CE, MNA-SF and NRS 2002 results correlated well with ESPEN results (k = 0.515, 0.496). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of MNA-SF and NRS 2002 were 0.803 and 0.776, respectively. For patients with AE, NRS 2002 and MNA-SF results correlated well with ESPEN (k = 0.555, 0.493). AUC values of NRS 2002 and MNA-SF were 0.776 and 0.792, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze hospitalized echinococcosis patients based on these nutritional screening tools. Our results suggest that NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are suitable tools for nutritional screening of inpatients with echinococcosis.

scholarly journals Coronavirus Disease 19 from the Perspective of Ageing with Focus on Nutritional Status and Nutrition Management—A Narrative Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1294
Author(s):  
Elisabet Rothenberg
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Nutrition Management ◽  
Age Related

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (COVID-19) has hit older adults harder due to a combination of age-related immunological and metabolic alterations. The aim of this review was to analyze the COVID-19 literature with respect to nutritional status and nutrition management in older adults. No studies only on people aged 65+ years were found, and documentation on those 80+ was rare. Age was found to be strongly associated with worse outcomes, and with poor nutritional status. Prevalence of malnutrition was high among severely and critically ill patients. The studies found a need for nutrition screening and management, and for nutrition support as part of follow-up after a hospital stay. Most tested screening tools showed high sensitivity in identifying nutritional risk, but none were recognized as best for screening older adults with COVID-19. For diagnosing malnutrition, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria are recommended but were not used in the studies found. Documentation of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in relation to nutritional status is missing in older adults. Other COVID-19-associated factors with a possible impact on nutritional status are poor appetite and gastrointestinal symptoms. Vitamin D is the nutrient that has attracted the most interest. However, evidence for supplementation of COVID-19 patients is still limited and inconclusive.

scholarly journals Nutrition screening tools for risk of malnutrition among hospitalized patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Cortes ◽  
Miquel Bennasar-Veny ◽  
Enrique Castro-Sanchez ◽  
Sergio Fresneda ◽  
Joan De Pedro-Gomez De Pedro-Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutrition Screening

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality at 3 Months in Stroke Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidel López Espuela ◽  
Raúl Roncero-Martín ◽  
Juan Diego Pedrera Zamorano ◽  
Purificación Rey-Sanchez ◽  
Ignacio Aliaga-Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Conut Score

Malnutrition is frequently observed in patients after stroke and is associated with poor outcomes. Patients at risk of malnutrition may be identified with several nutrition screening tools, but no nutritional screening tool has been validated for use with stroke patients. The aim of this study was to explore the ability of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score to predict 3-month mortality in stroke patients. Method: Patients were recruited from consecutive admissions at a hyperacute stroke unit and were screened for risk of malnutrition (light, moderate, or severe) using CONUT scores. At the next visit, 3-month outcomes were obtained. Results: Of the 164 recruited patients, 51.2% were male. Mean patient age was 77.7 ( SD = 7.0) years, and 85.8% of patients had an ischemic stroke. There was a significant difference in the survival rate ( p < .001) at 3 months between patients with moderate risk for malnourishment compared to the other patients. The multivariate regression Cox model showed that moderate risk of malnourishment, according to the CONUT score, increased the risk for death at 3 months (hazard ratio = 1.086; 95% CI [1.057, 8.305]; p < .039). Conclusion: The CONUT score has predictive validity for all-cause mortality in stroke patients after 3 months, both in hospital and after discharge. Further prospective multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to clarify the usefulness of the CONUT score in the prognosis of all-cause mortality in stroke patients.

scholarly journals Nutrition screening tools for risk of malnutrition among hospitalized patients

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (43) ◽  
pp. e22601
Author(s):  
Regina Cortes ◽  
Miquel Bennasar-Veny ◽  
Enrique Castro-Sanchez ◽  
Sergio Fresneda ◽  
Joan de Pedro-Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutrition Screening
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document