Labovian sociolinguistics constitutes an important paradigm that brings to the
forefront issues of social justice in linguistics and asks about the debt the
scholar has towards the community once s/he gets information from it.
Nevertheless, as many scholars have discussed, and even though this paradigm has
focused on changing society for the better, it has serious limitations on how it
conceptualizes the relationship between language and society. Based on critical
race theory and language ideologies, Lewis powerfully contributes to this
discussion by critiquing the principle of error correction
(PEC) proposed by Labov as a particular way of conceptualizing social change. As
Lewis points out at the end of the article, this principle reflects an ‘earlier
era’ and needs to be reconsidered in light of the significant transformations
not only in the study of language in society developed in recent decades but
also in critical theory and humanities in general.