scholarly journals Long-term survival data from a clinical trial on resin-bonded bridges

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.H.J. Creugers ◽  
R.J.A.M. De Kanter ◽  
M.A. van't Hof
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Douglas Reilly ◽  
Mark E. Nesbit ◽  
William Krivit

The long-term survival of three children with disseminated skeletal metastases due to neuroblastoma is reported. These three patients are added to eight other patients reported in the literature who have survived longer than 2 years after the development of their metastatic osseous lesions. A review of the cases did not reveal a specific treatment regime which provided the success in these cases. The presence of skeletal involvement, therefore, should not indicate a hopeless prognosis. A review of 33 patients with neuroblastoma at the University of Minnesota from 1956-1966 is also given to provide overall survival data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Michielin ◽  
Michael B Atkins ◽  
Henry B Koon ◽  
Reinhard Dummer ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto

Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized over the past decade. Long-term results with immuno-oncology (I-O) agents and targeted therapies are providing evidence of durable survival for a substantial number of patients. These results have prompted consideration of how best to define long-term benefit and cure. Now more than ever, oncologists should be aware of the long-term outcomes demonstrated with these newer agents and their relevance to treatment decision-making. As the first tumor type for which I-O agents were approved, melanoma has served as a model for other diseases. Accordingly, discussions regarding the value and impact of long-term survival data in patients with melanoma may be relevant in the future to other tumor types. Current findings indicate that, depending on the treatment, over 50% of patients with melanoma may gain durable survival benefit. The best survival outcomes are generally observed in patients with favorable prognostic factors, particularly normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase and/or a low volume of disease. Survival curves from melanoma clinical studies show a plateau at 3 to 4 years, suggesting that patients who are alive at the 3-year landmark (especially in cases in which treatment had been stopped) will likely experience prolonged cancer remission. Quality-of-life and mixture-cure modeling data, as well as metrics such as treatment-free survival, are helping to define the value of this long-term survival. In this review, we describe the current treatment landscape for melanoma and discuss the long-term survival data with immunotherapies and targeted therapies, discussing how to best evaluate the value of long-term survival. We propose that some patients might be considered functionally cured if they have responded to treatment and remained treatment-free for at least 2 years without disease progression. Finally, we consider that, while there have been major advances in the treatment of melanoma in the past decade, there remains a need to improve outcomes for the patients with melanoma who do not experience durable survival.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. iv18
Author(s):  
Bernard Nordlinger ◽  
Halfdan Sorbye ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Graeme John Poston ◽  
Peter M. Schlag ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-936
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yalchin ◽  
Amelia Oliveira ◽  
Deborah Pencharz ◽  
Shaunak Navalkissoor ◽  
Ann-Marie Quigley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document