scholarly journals Evolving impact of long-term survival results on metastatic melanoma treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Michielin ◽  
Michael B Atkins ◽  
Henry B Koon ◽  
Reinhard Dummer ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
The Past ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Melanoma Treatment

Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized over the past decade. Long-term results with immuno-oncology (I-O) agents and targeted therapies are providing evidence of durable survival for a substantial number of patients. These results have prompted consideration of how best to define long-term benefit and cure. Now more than ever, oncologists should be aware of the long-term outcomes demonstrated with these newer agents and their relevance to treatment decision-making. As the first tumor type for which I-O agents were approved, melanoma has served as a model for other diseases. Accordingly, discussions regarding the value and impact of long-term survival data in patients with melanoma may be relevant in the future to other tumor types. Current findings indicate that, depending on the treatment, over 50% of patients with melanoma may gain durable survival benefit. The best survival outcomes are generally observed in patients with favorable prognostic factors, particularly normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase and/or a low volume of disease. Survival curves from melanoma clinical studies show a plateau at 3 to 4 years, suggesting that patients who are alive at the 3-year landmark (especially in cases in which treatment had been stopped) will likely experience prolonged cancer remission. Quality-of-life and mixture-cure modeling data, as well as metrics such as treatment-free survival, are helping to define the value of this long-term survival. In this review, we describe the current treatment landscape for melanoma and discuss the long-term survival data with immunotherapies and targeted therapies, discussing how to best evaluate the value of long-term survival. We propose that some patients might be considered functionally cured if they have responded to treatment and remained treatment-free for at least 2 years without disease progression. Finally, we consider that, while there have been major advances in the treatment of melanoma in the past decade, there remains a need to improve outcomes for the patients with melanoma who do not experience durable survival.

scholarly journals Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.

scholarly journals Long-term survival data from a clinical trial on resin-bonded bridges

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.H.J. Creugers ◽  
R.J.A.M. De Kanter ◽  
M.A. van't Hof
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

CURE OF THREE PATIENTS WHO HAD SKELETAL METASTASES IN DISSEMINATED NEUROBLASTOMA

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Douglas Reilly ◽  
Mark E. Nesbit ◽  
William Krivit
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Skeletal Metastases ◽  
University Of Minnesota ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Skeletal Involvement ◽  
The University

The long-term survival of three children with disseminated skeletal metastases due to neuroblastoma is reported. These three patients are added to eight other patients reported in the literature who have survived longer than 2 years after the development of their metastatic osseous lesions. A review of the cases did not reveal a specific treatment regime which provided the success in these cases. The presence of skeletal involvement, therefore, should not indicate a hopeless prognosis. A review of 33 patients with neuroblastoma at the University of Minnesota from 1956-1966 is also given to provide overall survival data.

scholarly journals A New Aortic Arch Dissection Classification: The Fuwai Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juntao Qiu ◽  
Xinjin Luo ◽  
Jinlin Wu ◽  
Wei Pan ◽  
Qian Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Innominate Artery ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Surgical Mortality ◽  
Left Carotid Artery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Aims: We describe a new aortic arch dissection (AcD) classification, which we have called the Fuwai classification. We then compare the clinical characteristics and long-term prognoses of different classifications.Methods: All AcD patients who underwent surgical procedures at Fuwai Hospital from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study. AcD procedures are divided into three types: Fuwai type Cp, Ct, and Cd. Type Cp is defined as the innominate artery or combined with the left carotid artery involved. Type Cd is defined as the left subclavian artery or combined with the left carotid artery involved. All other AcD surgeries are defined as type Ct. The Chi-square test was adopted for the pairwise comparison among the three types. Kaplan-Meier was used for the analysis of long-term survival and survival free of reoperation.Results: In total, 1,063 AcD patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2015: 54 patients were type Cp, 832 were type Ct, and 177 were type Cd. The highest operation proportion of Cp, Ct and Cd were partial arch replacement, total arch replacement, and TEVAR. The surgical mortality in type Ct was higher compared to type Cd (Ct vs. Cd = 9.38 vs. 1.69%, p < 0.01) and type Cp (Ct vs. Cp = 9.38 vs. 1.85%, p = 0.06). There was no difference in surgical mortality of type Cp and Cd (p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the long-term survival rates (p = 0.38) and free of aorta-related re-operations (p = 0.19).Conclusion: The Fuwai classification is used to distinguish different AcDs. Different AcDs have different surgical mortality and use different operation methods, but they have similar long-term results.

Post-Discharge Outcomes After Pancreatic Necrosectomy: A Single Institution Experience Following Endoscopic vs Open Debridement

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110385
Author(s):  
Manuel Martinez ◽  
Steven Medeiros ◽  
James Dove ◽  
Mohsen Shabahang
Keyword(s):  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosectomy ◽  
Medical Comorbidities ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Pancreatic necrosectomy outcomes have been studied extensively; however, long-term results of these procedures have not been well characterized. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes at and after discharge for patients following necrosectomy. Methods Data from patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy at a single tertiary referral hospital from January 1, 2007, to June 1, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into an open pancreatic necrosectomy (OPN) and an endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy (EPN) group. Results Cohorts were composed of an OPN (n = 30) and EPN (n = 31) groups with a mean follow-up of 22 and 13.5 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographics or etiology of disease; however, the presence of severe sepsis and elevated BISAP scores was significantly higher in the OPN group (40% vs 13% p = .016, 37% vs 10% p = .012, respectively). There was no significant difference in discharge parameters or disposition other than a higher need for wound care in the OPN group (14% vs 0% p =< .0001). No significant difference in the number of patients who returned to baseline, 12-month ED visits, 12-month readmissions, medical comorbidities, or long-term survival was noted. Conclusions Previous studies have demonstrated that OPN patients have a higher severity of disease and higher inpatient mortality; however, this does not hold true once the acute phase of the illness has passed. Long-term medical comorbidities and survival of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis who endure the primary insult do not differ in long term, regardless of the debridement modality performed for source control.

scholarly journals Long‐Term Survival and Risk of Institutionalization in Onco‐Geriatric Surgical Patients: Long‐Term Results of the PREOP Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1241
Author(s):  
Monique G. Huisman ◽  
Federico Ghignone ◽  
Giampaolo Ugolini ◽  
Grigory Sidorenkov ◽  
Isacco Montroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals O-0030 Long Term Survival Data from EORTC Study 40983: Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. iv18
Author(s):  
Bernard Nordlinger ◽  
Halfdan Sorbye ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Graeme John Poston ◽  
Peter M. Schlag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Relapse Rate and Long-Term Survival of AL Amyloidosis Patients Treated with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (HDM/SCT).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094
Author(s):  
David C. Seldin ◽  
Martha Skinner ◽  
Betul Oran ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
Kathleen T. Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Early Results

Abstract AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia in which clonal immunoglobulin light chains misfold and are deposited in tissues, leading to organ failure in untreated patients, with median survival of only ~1 year. Oral melphalan and prednisone is minimally effective for the disease, with an increase in median survival to ~1.5 years, and a low rate of hematologic complete responses (CRs). Twelve years ago, we began treating patients with AL amyloidosis with HDM/SCT. In the plasma cell malignancy multiple myeloma, this approach produces hematologic CRs and improves survival, but is not curative, as all patients eventually relapse. In AL amyloidosis, the relapse rate and long-term survival have not been studied, but early results are promising, with most centers reporting CR rates of ~40% and excellent survival in responding patients. To address the durability and long-term results of treatment with HDM/SCT, here we report on the outcome for AL amyloidosis patients treated at Boston Medical Center with HDM/SCT >10 years ago. The first autologous transplant took place on July 18, 1994 in two years, by July 18, 1996, 43 patients with AL amyloidosis without myeloma or other hematologic disease had been treated with HDM/SCT, receiving 100–200 mg/m2 melphalan depending upon age and protocol. Of the 43 patients treated in this 2 yr period, 76% of the patients were male, 81% had a lambda monoclonal disease, and their median age was 52 (range, 29–71). In these first 43 patients, the 100 day peri-transplant mortality rate was 16%. Nineteen of the 43 patients (44%) achieved a hematologic CR after treatment. In annual followup, 4 of 19 patients (21%) eventually relapsed. Fourteen of 43 patients (33%) are still alive; 12 of 19 patients who achieved a CR (63%) are still alive, while only 2 of 34 patients who did not (6%) are still alive. Although there were fewer (8) patients with kappa clonal disease, they had a better outcome, with an 87% CR rate vs. 34% for lambda (P=0.006); 75% of the kappa patients are still alive, vs. 23% of the lambda patients (P=0.005). The median survival of all 43 patients is 4.7 years. Thus, treatment of AL amyloidosis patients with HDM/SCT produces a high CR rate that is durable and is associated with excellent 10 year survival, particularly for those patients achieving a hematologic CR and for patients with kappa clonal disease. Ongoing clinical trials of HDM/SCT, along with strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality and to improve the CR rate, incorporating additional cycles of HDM/SCT or new anti-plasma cell agents, appear to be well-justified by these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document