Long-term effects of dormant-season prescribed fire on plant community diversity, structure and productivity in a longleaf pine wiregrass ecosystem

1997 ◽  
Vol 96 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 167-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale G. Brockway ◽  
Clifford E. Lewis
Author(s):  
Alyson Gagnon ◽  
Laura W. Ploughe ◽  
Michelle P. Harris ◽  
Wendy C. Gardner ◽  
Thomas Pypker ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Robert C. Sparks ◽  
Norwin E. Linnartz ◽  
Harold E. Harris

Abstract Pruning and thinning a young natural stand of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in southwest Louisiana had little influence on height. However, diameter growth was reduced substantially as pruning intensity or stocking rate increased up to 25-percent live crown and 200 stems per acre, respectively. Improved diameter growth at lower stocking rates was not sufficient to equal the total basal area increment of 200 trees per acre.


2014 ◽  
Vol 328 ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren T. Bennett ◽  
Cristina Aponte ◽  
Thomas G. Baker ◽  
Kevin G. Tolhurst

1974 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Perala

The effects of prescribed burning and complete clearcutting on Populustremuloides and associated hardwoods and shrubs were compared for 8 years after commercial harvest of a 60-year-old P. tremuloides stand. Because of the lack of suitable burning weather, P. tremuloides suckers were 2 years old before the burn could be made. All suckers were killed by fire and new suckers were more numerous but less vigorous, probably because of heat damage to shallow sucker-producing roots, loss of nitrogen, and reduced root carbohydrate reserves. Although prescribed fire can effectively control residual hardwood overstories detrimental to P. tremuloides sucker growth and survival, the long term effect of fire on sucker growth is unknown. Fire can be used to prepare sites for P. tremuloides regeneration when other methods are unavailable or impractical. Burning should be done during the first dormant season following logging. Effort should be made to distribute slash uniformly to provide even burning conditions. Burning prescription guidelines are given.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte C. Trowbridge ◽  
Amanda Stanley ◽  
Thomas N. Kaye ◽  
Peter W. Dunwiddie ◽  
Jennifer L. Williams

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Willis ◽  
Ajay Sharma ◽  
John S. Kush

Emulating natural disturbance has become an increasingly important restoration strategy. In the fire-maintained woodlands of the southeastern United States, contemporary restoration efforts have focused on approximating the historical fire regime by burning at short intervals. Due to concerns over escape and damage to mature trees, most prescribed burning has occurred in the dormant season, which is inconsistent with the historical prevalence of lightning-initiated fire in the region. This discordance between contemporary prescribed burning and what is thought to be the historical fire regime has led some to question whether dormant season burning should remain the most common management practice; however, little is known about the long-term effects of repeated growing season burning on the health and productivity of desirable tree species. To address this question, we report on a long-term experiment comparing the effects of seasonal biennial burning (winter, spring, and summer) and no burning on the final survival status, height, diameter, and volume growth of 892 mature longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) over 23 years in three mature even-aged stands in southern Alabama, United States. Overall, longleaf pine survival across all treatments averaged 81 ± 2% [s.e]. Among seasonal burn treatments, survival was highest in the spring burns (82 ± 4%) but did not vary significantly from any other treatment (summer – 79 ± 4%, winter – 81 ± 4%, unburned – 84 ± 4%). However, survival was statistically influenced by initial diameter at breast height, as survival of trees in the largest size class (30 cm) was 40% higher than trees in the smallest size class (5 cm). Productivity of longleaf pine was not significantly different among treatment averages in terms of volume (38.9–44.1 ± 6.0 m3 ha–1), diameter (6.0–6.7 ± 0.3 cm), and height (2.5–3.4 ± 0.4 m) growth. Collectively, our results demonstrate that burning outside the dormant season will have little impact on mature longleaf pine survival and growth. This finding has important implications for the maintenance of restored southeastern woodlands, as interest in burning outside the dormant season continues to grow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document